Vol. 27, No. 1 (2015)
Synthesis of 1,1-Diacetates Catalyzed by Cellulose Sulfonic Acid from Aldehydes and Acetic Anhydride 341
-
1
5
0 °C in a round-bottom flask with a reflux condenser. After
IR (KBr, νmax, cm ) = 3045, 3015, 1760, 1615, 1521, 1375,
1240, 1205, 995, 930.
completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction
mixture was filtered to separated the catalyst which is reusable.
The filtrate was extracted with dichloromethane and dried over
1
1,1-Diacetoxy-1-(2-nitrophenyl)methane (entry 5): H
NMR (CDCl
3
, 400 MHz): δ = 2.15 (s, 6H), 7.54-7.66 (m, 1H),
2 4
anhydrous Na SO . The dichloromethane solution was evapo-
7.70-7.73 (m, 2H), 8.05-8.08 (m, 1H), 8.21 (s, 1H); IR (KBr,
-1
rated under reduced pressure to provide the crude product.
Then the isolated crude product was purified by TLC to provide
the corresponding aldehydes in pure form.
ν
max, cm ): 3019, 1763, 1534, 1374, 1216, 757, 669.
1,1-Diacetate-1-(3-nitrophenyl)methane (entry 6): H
NMR (CDCl , 400 MHz): δ = 8.39 (s, 1H), 8.28-8.24 (dd, J =
8.2, 1.2 Hz, 1H),7.83 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.61-
1
3
1
1
,1-Diacetoxy-1-phenyl-methane (entry 1): H NMR
-1
(
CDCl , 400 MHz): δ = 2.02 (s, 6H), 7.35-7.43 (m, 3H), 7.52-
3
7.57 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.14 (s, 6H); IR (KBr, νmax, cm ):
2963, 1760, 1533, 1358, 1255, 1203, 1091, 1016, 809, 685.
-1
7
.55 (s, 2H), 7.72 (s, 1H); IR (KBr, νmax, cm ): 3060, 1752,
1
1,1-Diacetoxybutane (entry 7): H NMR (CDCl
1
602, 1470, 1378, 1245, 1210, 1065, 1015, 758, 702.
1
,1-Diacetoxy-1-(4-chlorophenyl)methane (entry 2): H
3
, 400
MHz): δ = 0.94 (t, J = 3.5 Hz, 3H), 1.42-1.45 (m, 2H), 1.77-
1.79 (m, 2H), 2.06 (s, 6H), 6.80 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H); IR (KBr,
1
NMR (CDCl , 400 MHz): δ = 2.18 (s, 6H), 7.38 (d, J = 6.4
3
-1
Hz, 2H), 7.46 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (s, 1H); IR (KBr, νmax,
cm ): 3014, 2913, 1764, 1749, 1609, 1477, 1370, 1237, 1201,
ν
max, cm ): 2956, 2880, 1755, 1250, 1225, 1080.
1,1-Diacetoxy-1-(cinnamyl)methane (entry 8): H NMR
(CDCl , 400 MHz): δ = 2.11 (s, 6H), 6.15 (dd, J = 15.0 Hz, 6
-1
1
1
037, 795, 675.
,1-Diacetoxy-1-(2-methoxyphenyl)methane (entry 3):
H NMR (CDCl , 400 MHz): δ = 2.11 (s, 6H), 3.85 (s, 3H),
3
1
Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 7.28-7.34 (m, 5H), 7.38 (d,
-1
J = 6.0 Hz, 1H); IR (KBr, νmax, cm ): 3020, 2971, 2876, 1759,
1
3
6
.91 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (td, J = 7.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H),
.37 (td, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 8.02
1601, 1472, 1216, 1011, 759, 669.
7
-1
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
(
s, 1H); IR (KBr, νmax, cm ): 1760, 1244, 1203, 1000, 760.
,1-Diacetoxy-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)methane (entry 4):
H NMR (CDCl , 400 MHz): δ = 2.11 (s, 6H), 3.81 (s, 3H),
.75 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (s, 1H);
1
As shown in Table-1, both aromatic and aliphatic
aldehydes reacted smoothly with acetic anhydride to afford
the corresponding geminal diacetates in good to excellent
1
3
6
TABLE-1
PROTECTION REACTION OF ALDEHYDE CARBONYL CATALYZED BY CELLULOSE SULFONIC ACID
m.p. (°C)
Reported
a
Yield (%)
Entry
1
Substrate
CHO
Product
CH(OAc)2
Time (min)
3
Found
41-42
1
0
98
44-45
CHO
CH(OAc)2
b
92 ,95,95
c
25
2
3
4
3
3
3
82-83
81-83
69-70
65-67
Cl
Cl
CHO
CH(OAc)2
2
6
6
88
95
68-70
65-66
OCH3
OCH3
CHO
CH(OAc)2
2
H CO
3
H3CO
O2N
CHO
NO2
CH(OAc)2
1
6
5
3
92
88
86
NO2
O2N
CHO
CH(OAc)2
2
6
6
7
3
3
96
95
65-66
65
O
CH(OAc)2
CH(OAc)2
27
Oil
Oil
H
CHO
2
7
8
9
3
93
0
86
85-87
-
O
-
180
-
O
1
0
-
180
0
-
-
a
b
Yields refer to the isolated pure products. 0.045 g cellulose sulfonic acid, 0.055 g cellulose sulfonic acid was used
c