1492
Meng Liu et al. / Chinese Journal of Catalysis 40 (2019) 1488–1493
Graphical Abstract
Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40: 1488–1493 doi: S1872-2067(19)63413-3
Aliphatic amines modified CoO nanoparticles for catalytic oxidation of
aromatic hydrocarbon with molecular oxygen
WCA 143
o
Meng Liu, Song Shi *, Li Zhao, Chen Chen, Jin Gao, Jie Xu *
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences;
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Ningbo University
N-R
WCA 11
o
The amines-modified CoO nanoparticles exhibited hydrophobic properties
with a water contact angle of 143°, which was accompanied by better per-
formance in the hydrocarbon oxidation process compared to that of the
hydrophilic commercial CoO nanoparticles.
[12] T. Liu, H. Cheng, L. Sun, F. Liang, C. Zhang, Z. Ying, W. Lin, F. Zhao,
lin, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 8351–8357.
Appl. Catal. A, 2016, 512, 9–14.
[23] X. Jia, J. Ma, F. Xia, Y. Xu, J. Gao, J. Xu, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 933.
[24] M. Tamura, R. Kishi, Y. Nakagawa, K. Tomishige, Nat. Commun.,
2015, 6, 8580.
[25] L. Li, X. Sun, X. Qiu, J. Xu, G. Li, Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47, 8839–8846.
[26] X. Liu, M. Atwater, J. Wang, Q. Dai, J. Zou, J. P. Brennan, Q. Huo, J.
Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2007, 7, 3126–3133.
[
13] H. Li, L. Li, Y. Li, Nanotechnol. Rev., 2013, 2, 515–518.
14] W. Shi, L. Cao, H. Zhang, X. Zhou, B. An, Z. Lin, R. Dai, J. Li, C. Wang,
W. Lin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 9704–9709.
[
[
[
[
15] C. Chen, J. Xu, Q. Zhang, H. Ma, H. Miao, L. Zhou, J. Phys. Chem. C,
2009, 113, 2855–2860.
16] M. Wang, C. Chen, Q. Zhang, Z. Du, Z. Zhang, J. Gao, J. Xu, J. Chem.
Technol. Biotechnol., 2010, 85, 283–287.
17] C. Chen, S. Shi, M. Wang, H. Ma, L. Zhou, J. Xu, J. Mater. Chem. A,
[27] Y. Tian, B. Yu, X. Li, K. Li, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 2476–2481.
[28] Z. Xu, C. Shen, Y. Hou, H. Gao, S. Sun, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21,
1778–1780.
2
014, 2, 8126–8134.
[29] B. Ernst, S. Libs, P. Chaumette, A. Kiennemann, Appl. Catal. A,
1999, 186, 145–168.
[30] T. Garcia, S. Agouram, J. F. Sánchez-Royo, R. Murillo, A. M. Mastral,
A. Aranda, I. Vázquez, A. Dejoz, B. Solsona, Appl. Catal. A, 2010,
386, 16–27.
[
18] L. Wang, F.-S. Xiao, ChemCatChem, 2014, 6, 3048–3052.
19] T. Li, J. Wang, F. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Jiang, H. Arandiyan, H. Li,
ChemCatChem, 2019, 11, 1576–1586.
[
[
[
[
20] J. Zhang, X. Liu, R. Blume, A. Zhang, R. Schlögl, D. S. Su, Science,
2
008, 322, 73–77.
[31] Y. Chen, S. Zhao, Z. Liu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17,
14012–14020.
[32] K. B. Klepper, O. Nilsen, H. Fjellvåg, Thin Solid Films, 2007, 515,
7772–7781.
21] F. Studt, F. Abild-Pedersen, T. Bligaard, R. Z. Sorensen, C. H. Chris-
tensen, J. K. Norskov, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 9299–9302.
22] L. D. Ellis, R. M. Trottier, C. B. Musgrave, D. K. Schwartz, J. W. Med-
脂肪胺修饰的CoO纳米粒子催化分子氧选择氧化芳香烃
a,b
a,#
a,b
a,c
a
a,*
刘 梦 , 石 松 , 赵 丽 , 陈 晨 , 高 进 , 徐 杰
a
中国科学院大连化学物理研究所催化基础国家重点实验室, 洁净能源国家实验室(筹), 辽宁大连116023
b
中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
c
宁波大学材料科学与化学工程学院, 浙江宁波 315211
摘要: 以分子氧为氧化剂实现烃类的选择氧化在学术研究和工业应用中均具有重要的意义. 钴氧化物(CoO
催化烃类选择氧化过程中具有较高的催化活性, 其粒径、孔结构以及组分等因素均对催化活性有着重要的影响. 由于烃类
氧化反应过程中生成的产物分子极性大于底物分子, 使得疏水的催化剂对该类反应有利. 而CoO 由于自身表面羟基的存
在呈亲水性质, 因此可以通过疏水修饰进一步提升CoO 的催化活性. 我们课题组报道了通过有机硅烷的修饰方法制备了
x
)纳米粒子在
x
x
疏水钴基二氧化硅材料, 该过程是通过对载体的间接修饰而达到调控催化剂亲疏水微环境的目的. 然而, 关于CoO
位点的直接疏水修饰较少报道, 对于CoO 进行修饰制备疏水纳米粒子是一个具有挑战性的工作.
本文利用有机胺对CoO 纳米粒子进行有机修饰, 得到了丁胺(BA)修饰的BA-CoO和十二胺(DA)修饰的DA-CoO催化
x
活性
x
x
o
o
剂, 静态水滴接触角分别为126 和143 , 证明了其表面呈疏水性质,并且二者疏水角度具有一定的差异. 通过X射线粉末衍