25580 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 110, No. 51, 2006
Letters
Figure 3. Time evolution of mass signal intensity of m/e ) 45 (15N14-
NO) and m/e ) 44 (14N2O) when a Rh(111) surface completely covered
with chemisorbed 14N and 14NO was exposed to 15NO gas (T ) 120 K,
PNO ) 1 × 10-6 Torr). The small structure in the m/e ) 45 curve at
around 5 s is ascribed to a drop of NO pressure.
Figure 4. (a) Experimentally obtained energy diagram for the reaction.
The errors for Ed, Er, and Ea′ was 0.05, 0.02, and 0.01 eV, respectively.
(b) Proposed reaction model based on the density functional theory
(DFT) calculations.15
2NO(g) a (NO)2 (precursor)
(2-1)
atures, but the extrinsic-precursor-mediated N2O formation may
not be negligible, even under realistic conditions at the higher
temperatures due to high NO pressures.
(NO)2 (precursor) + N(a) f N2O(g) + NO(a) (2-2)
Negative activation energies have been sometimes interpreted
in terms of the difference between the real activation energy of
the reaction (Er) and that of the desorption of the weakly bound
reactant (Ed): Er - Ed.10,11 If Er is smaller than Ed, a negative
apparent activation energy is observed. Figure 4a shows the
energy diagram obtained from the NEXAFS experiments. Ed
was estimated from the rate of decomposition-desorption
process of the NO dimer on top of a pure NO monolayer, and
Er was obtained from the consumption rate of atomic N in the
reaction below 100 K. The estimated energies are consistent
with one another within their errors, supporting the proposed
reaction mechanism (2-1 and 2-2). Surface reactions where
extrinsic precursors directly participate are very rare.11
Although the microscopic reaction mechanism including NO
dimers cannot be deduced from the present experimental results,
we tentatively propose a reaction model based on the density
functional theory calculations15 as illustrated in Figure 4b. The
reaction proceeds via formation of a new N-N bond between
an N atom and an NO dimer (ii). According to a recent
theoretical study, NO dimer is electrophilic and easily forms a
chemical bond with electron-rich species.4 Then, one of the NO
units of the complex (ii) replaces the N atom bound to the
surface concomitantly with elongation of the N-N bond of the
dimer (iii). Finally, the N-N bond dissociates to release an N2O
molecule with an NO molecule remaining on the surface (iv).
Physisorbed NO monomers were not detected in the present
NEXAFS observations.16 It should be noted that we cannot
completely exclude the possibility that a small amount of NO
monomers physisorbed on top of the chemisorbed monolayer
and/or supplied by dissociation of dimers react with the atomic
N. However, we assume that the NO monomers do not
contribute primarily to the reaction; if they can react with N
atoms, the reaction should immediately start to occur without
any induction period after the NO exposure is started. That the
reactivity of the NO dimer is higher than the monomer is
presumably due to its electrophilicity4 and increased van der
Waals interactions caused by the larger molecular weight.
It was revealed that in the N+NO reaction on Rh(111) at
70-350 K, the NO dimer in the extrinsic precursor state directly
reacts with atomic N to form N2O and NO. The practical
catalytic NO reduction on Rh surfaces, however, proceeds at
higher temperatures above 350 K. In the present study, the role
of the extrinsic precursor was prominent at the lower temper-
In conclusion, we found from the real-time monitoring of
the N+NO reaction on Rh(111) with the fast NEXAFS
technique that an extrinsic precursor formed on the chemisorbed
N+NO layer reacts with atomic N to form N2O. The precursor
is identified as an NO dimer species with an N-N bond. The
direct observation of the NO dimer contributing to the reaction
may support the possibility that NO dimers are involved as a
reaction precursor in many NO-related reaction systems.
Acknowledgment. The present work is supported by the
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) in Priority
Area “Molecular Nano Dynamics” from MEXT. The present
work has been performed under the approval of the Photon
Factory Program Advisory Committee (PF PAC No.2001S2-
003 and 2004G-320).
Supporting Information Available: Comparison between
an N-K NEXAFS spectrum of the precursor (Figure S1) and
that of NO dimer (Figure S2). This material is available free of
References and Notes
(1) Zhdanov, V. P.; Kasemo, B. Surf. Sci. Rep. 1997, 29, 31 and
references therein.
(2) (a) Zaera, F.; Gopinath C. S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 332, 209.
(b) Zaera, F.; Gopinath C. S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 646.
(3) Belton, D. N.; DiMaggio, C. L.; Schmieg, S. J.; Ng, K. Y. S. J.
Catal. 1995, 157, 559.
(4) Zhao, Y.-L.; Bartberger, M. D.; Goto, K.; Shimada, K.; Kawashima,
T.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7964.
(5) (a) Lim, M. D.; Lorkovic, I. M.; Ford. P. C. Inorg. Chem. 2002,
41, 1026.(b) Goto, K.; Hino, Y.; Kawashima, T.; Kaminaga, M.; Yano, E.;
Yamamoto, G.; Takagi, N.; Nagase, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8479.
(6) Nitric Oxide, Biology and Pathobiology; Ignarro, L. J. Ed.;
Academic Press: San Diego, 2000.
(7) Brown, W. A.; Gardner, P.; King, D. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99,
7065.
(8) Amemiya, K; Kondoh, H.; Yokoyama, T.; Ohta, T. J. Electron.
Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2002, 124, 151.
(9) van Hardeveld, R. M.; van Santen, R. A.; Niemantsverdriet, J. W.
J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 998.
(10) (a) Ertl, G.; Lee, S. B.; Weiss, M. Surf. Sci. 1982, 114, 515. (b)
Elliott, A. J.; Hadden, R. A.; Tabatabaei, J.; Waugh, K. C.; Zemicael, F.
W. J. Catal. 1995, 157, 153.
(11) Celio, H.; Scheer, K. C.; White, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 2990.
(12) Kang, H. C.; Weinberg, W. H. Surf. Sci. 1994, 299/300, 755.