catalyzed cyclohydroamination of amines tethered to more
encumbered alkenes (e.g., 1,2-disubstituted alkenes) has
remained elusive7a,12 (cf. eq 1).
Cyclizations of amines tethered to 1,2-disubstituted alkenes
are of fundamental importance for the construction of
heterocyclic systems bearing key substituents present in
naturally occurring alkaloids. Although cyclohydroamination
of aminoalkynes and aminoallenes can introduce a variety
of longer chain alkyl substituents onto product pyrrolidine
and piperidine skeletons, the synthesis of these substrates is
not necessarily straightforward. Furthermore, additional
reductive transformations of the resulting imine or alkene
products are required to obtain saturated targets. We now
report that the use of more coordinatively unsaturated and
thermally robust organolanthanide complexes combined with
higher reaction temperatures allows extension of aminoalkene
cyclohydroaminations to 1,2-disubstituted alkenes.13
Facile organolanthanide-catalyzed cyclohydroamination
demonstrates that insertion of C-C multiple bonds into
Ln-N bonds via a four-centered transition state (T1, Figure
1) can be efficaciously coupled to rapid protonolysis of the
resulting Ln-C bonds11 (i.e., 3 f 4; Figure 1). The inherent
limitation in 1,2-disubstituted alkene insertion is reasonably
attributed to severe nonbonded repulsions and possible charge
separation imbalance in the reasonably well-characterized
transition state11 (T1, Figure 1), both deriving from the
sterically demanding, electron-donating alkyl substitution.
The steric sensitivity of the olefin insertion step doubtless
reflects subtle changes in the catalyst coordination environ-
(3) For hydroaminations mediated by early transition metals, see: (a)
Kim, Y. K.; Livinghouse, T.; Bercaw, J. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
2933-2935. (b) Haak, E.; Siebeneicher, H.; Doye, S. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
1935-1937. (c) Molander, G. A. Chemtracts: Org. Chem. 1998, 11, 237-
263. (d) McGrane, P. L.; Livinghouse, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
11485-11489. (e) Baranger, A. M.; Walsh, P. J.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2753-2763. (f) Walsh, P. J.; Hollander, F. J.;
Bergman, R. G. Organometallics 1993, 12, 3705-3723. (g) McGrane, P.
L.; Jensen, M.; Livinghouse, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5459-5460.
(4) For organolanthanide reviews, see: (a) Deacon, G. B.; Shen, Q. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1996, 506, 1-17. (b) Schumann, H.; Meese-Marktschef-
fel, J. A.; Esser, L. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 865-986. (c) Edelmann, F. T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2466-2488.
(5) (a) Giardello, M. A.; Conticello, V. P.; Brard, L.; Gagne´, M. R.;
Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10241-10254. (b) Gagne´, M.
R.; Nolan, S. P.; Marks, T. J. Organometallics 1990, 9, 1716-1718. (c)
Gagne´, M. R.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4108-4109.
(6) (a) Li, Y.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9295-9306.
(b) Li, Y.; Fu, P.-F.; Marks, T. J. Organometallics 1994, 13, 439-440.
(7) (a) Arredondo, V. M.; McDonald, F. E.; Marks, T. J. Organometallics
1999, 18, 1949-1960. (b) Arredondo, V. M.; McDonald, F. E.; Marks, T.
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4871-4872.
Figure 1. Proposed catalytic cycle for organolanthanide-catalyzed
cyclohydroamination of aminoalkenes.
ment, and therefore lanthanide ions of maximum ionic radius
and more open ancillary ligation should in principle reduce
congestion.11 Previous kinetic studies of 2,2-dimethyl-4-
pentene-1-amine cyclohydroamination (A, eq 2) revealed a
(8) (a) Li, Y.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1757-1771.
(b) Li, Y.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 707-708.
(9) Arredondo, V. A.; Tian, S.; McDonald, F. E.; Marks, T. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3633-3639.
(10) Li, Y.; Marks, T. J. Organometallics 1996, 15, 3370-3372.
(11) Gagne´, M. R.; Stern, C. L.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 275-294.
significant rate dependence on lanthanide ionic radius (Nt
) 95 s-1 (25 °C) for La3+ vs Nt < 1 s-1 (80 °C) for Lu3+)11
and enhanced activity using more open organolanthanide
centers (e.g., Nt ) 181 h-1 (25 °C) for (CGC)SmN(TMS)2
(5a) vs Nt ) 48 h-1 (80 °C) for Cp′2SmCH(TMS)2 (8b)).14b
(12) Molander, G. A.; Dowdy, E. D. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8983-
8988.
(13) Ryu, J.-S.; Marks, T. J.; McDonald, F. E. Presented in part at the
221st National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, San Diego, CA,
April 1-5, 2001; Abstract ORGN 265.
3092
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 20, 2001