2
Tetrahedron Letters
Several solvents, including ethanol, methanol, acetonitrile,
Acknowledgments
dimethylformamide and water were investigated with the best
results based on yields and reaction times achieved using water
as the solvent. The reaction was examined at different
temperatures. No reaction occurred after 24 h stirring at room
temperature. Increasing the temperature to a maximum of 100 ºC,
showed that the reaction rate was greatest at 80 ºC and that
further increases in temperature did not show further
enhancement of the yield. Further optimization of the reaction
conditions was carried out using different amounts of
[Cu(Im12)2]CuCl2 showing that 0.5 mmol of promoter was
effective for the coupling reaction.
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support of this
research by Shahid Chamran (Ahvaz) University.
References and notes
1. (a) Corbert, J. P.; Mignani, G. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2651-2710; (b)
Beccalli, E. M.; Broggini, G.; Martinelli, M.; Sottocornola, S. Chem. Rev.
2007, 107, 5318-5365; (c) Evano, G.; Blanchard, N.; Toumi, M. Chem. Rev.
2008, 108, 3054-3131; (d) Grauer, A.; Spät , a, ni , B. Chem.-
Asian J. 2009, 4, 1134-1140.
2. (a) Ullmann, F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1903, 36, 2382-2384; (b) Ullmann,
F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1904, 37, 853-854; (c) Lindly, J. Tetrahedron
1984, 40, 1433-1456; (d) Unangst, P. C.; Connor, D. T.; Stabler, S. R.;
Weikert, R. J. J. Hetrocycle. Chem. 1987, 24, 811-816.
3. (a) Mann, G.; Hartwig, J. F.; Driver, M. S.; Fernandez-Rivas, C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 827-828; (b) Watanable, M.; Nishiyama, M.;
Yamamoto, T.; Koie, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 481-483; (c) Grasa, G.
A.; Viciu, M. S.; Huang, J.; Nolan, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7729-7737.
4. (a) Kunaz, K.; Scholz, U.; Ganzer, D. Synlett 2003, 15, 2428-2439; (b)
Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2337-
2364; (c) Corbet, J. P.; Mignani, G. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2651-2710; (d)
Ley, S. V.; Thomas, A. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5400-5449; (e)
Swapana, K.; Murthy, S. N.; Nageswar, Y. V. D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010,
34, 6678- 6684.
Finally, under the optimized reaction conditions, the
generality and scope of this new protocol were explored. A range
of functionalized aryl halides were reacted with indole to give the
corresponding N-arylindoles (Table 2). Additionally, the
reactions of pyrazole and imidazole were investigated. It was
found that the reaction generally proceeded smoothly to give the
corresponding N-arylated products in high yields. The reactivity
of aryl iodides containing electron-withdrawing groups was
higher than that of aryl iodides containing electron-donating
groups. Sterically hindered aryl iodides, such as N-(2-
methoxyphenyl)
indole,
reacted
slower than
N-(4-
5. Balderas, P. F.; Munoz, O. M.; Sanfrutos, M. J.; Mateo, H. F.; Flores, F.
G.; Asin, J. A.; Garcia, I. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1951-1954.
methoxyphenyl)indole. A proposed mechanistic pathway for the
[Cu(Im12)2]CuCl2 promoted N-arylation of indole is depicted in
Figure 1.
6. Malkoch, M.; Schleicher, K.; Drockenmuller, E.; Hawker, C. J.; Russell, T.
P.; Wu, P.; Fokin, V. V. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 3663-3678.
7. Wu, P.; Feldman, A. K.; Nugent, A. K.; Hawker, C. J.; Scheel, A.; Voit,
B.; Pyun, J.; Frechet, J. M. J.; Sharpless, K. B.; Fokin, V. V. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3928-3932.
Table 2
8. (a) Lindstorm, U. M., Ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: New York, NY, 2007; (b)
Simon, M. O.; Li, C. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1415-1427.
9. (a) Dwars, T.; Paetzold, E.; Oehme, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
7174-7199; (b) Lipshutz, B. H.; Ghorai, S. Aldrichimica Acta. 2008, 41, 59-
72.
10. (a) Stricker, M.; Linder, T.; Oelkers, B.; Sundemeyer, J. Green Chem.,
2010, 12, 1589–1598; (b) Zarei Ahmady, A.; Heidarizadeh, F.; Keshavarz. M.
Synthetic Communications, 2013, 43, 2100-2109; (c) Keshavarz, M.; Karami,
B; Zarei Ahmady, A.; Ghaedi, A. M.; Vafaei, H. C. R. Chimie, 2013, 17 ,
570-576.
Figure 1
The reusability of the promoter was examined with the
reaction of indole with iodobenzene. After reaction completion,
the product was extracted from the ionic liquid mixture using
EtOAc. The recovered ionic liquid mixture was used directly in
the next run and the results are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3
11. Hurley, F. H.; US Pat., 2 446 331, 1948.
The efficiency of this method was compared to recently
reported methods for the N-arylation of imidazole15-16, 18-20 (Table
4). The reported procedure involves the use of a recoverable
promoter, avoidance of organic solvents, mild reaction
conditions, high yield, short reaction time and low temperature.21
12. Sun, H.; Harm, K.; Sundemeyer, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9550–
9551.
13. Chauvin, Y.; Muβmann, L.; Olivier, H. Angew. Chem., 1995, 107, 2941–2943
14. (a) Mata, J.; Varade, D.; Ghosh, G.; Bahadur, P. Colloids Surf., A 2004,
245, 69-73 (b) Jain, R.; Sharma, K.; Kumar, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53,
6236- 6240 (c) Kumar, B. A.; Satyanarayana, G.; Parthasarathy, T.; Uma, V.
J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2005, 82, 558-560 (d) Buxaderas, E.; Alonso, D. A.;
Nájera, C. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 46508-46512.
Table 4
We postulate that the [Cu(Im12)2]CuCl2 had a synergistic
effect where the Lewis acid part of the promoter activates the
substrates and the surfactant part helps solubilize the substrates in
water. Thus, the combination of these two effects enhance the
rate and the yield of the reaction.
15. Chen, H. H.; Huang, H. M.; Chen, S.C.; Chen, Y. G. J. Chin. Chem. Soc,
2010, 57, 14-18.
16. Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yang L.; Zhang M. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 6230-
6233.
17. Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Sun, F.; Feng, Y.; Jin, K.; Wang, X. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 8639-8642.
18. Kim, A.Y.; Lee H. J.; Park J. C.; Kang H.; Yang H.; Song H.; Park K. H.
Molecules 2009, 14, 5169-5178.
19. Antilla, J. C.; M. Baskin J.; E. Barder, T.; L. Buchwald, S. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 5578-5587.
20. Khalil, A.; Fihri, A.; Jouiad, M.; Hashaikeh, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014,
55, 5973-5975.
3. Conclusion
The current research reports a simple, one-pot synthesis of N-
arylindoles, N-arylpyrazoles and N-arylimidazoles using a
reusable surfactant type copper based ionic liquid and base. It is
postulated that the surfactant properties increased the
concentration of organic reactants to form micelle particles in
water. The advantages of this methodology include the use of
water as solvent, using an aryl halide instead of boronic acid
derivatives, ease of product isolation and the capacity for
promoter recycling. Accordingly, the methodology can be
regarded as a useful and attractive process for the synthesis of N-
arylated heterocycles. We believe that this procedure may have
industrial and scale-up applications.
21. Preparation of [Cu(Im12)2]CuCl2: A solution of 1-dodecylimidazole
(Im12) (3.06 g, 12.95 mmol) in CH3CN (5 mL) was added to a Schlenk flask
filled with CuCl (1.21 g, 12.22 mmol). The reaction was placed in an
ultrasonic bath at ambient temperature for approximately 30 min. The solvent
was removed in vacuo and the precipitate washed with Et2O and dried under
vacuum to give [Cu(Im12)2]CuCl2 as a fine crystalline colorless solid (4.6 g,
99 %). General procedure for the synthesis of N-arylated heterocycles in
Ullman-type coupling: At first [Cu(Im12)2]CuCl2 (0.5 mmol, 0.305 g) was
added to a 25 ml round bottom flask containing water (4 mL), indole (0.117
g, 1 mmol) and iodobenzene (0.203 g, 1 mmol). K2CO3 (0.276 g, 2 mmol)
and TBAB (0.322 g, 1 mmol) was added and the reaction stirred at 80 ºC for
12 hours. The reaction progress was monitored by TLC (EtOAc/n-hexane;
1:3 v/v) and after completion, the organic phase was extracted from the ionic
liquid with EtOAc (2×8 mL) and concentrated in vacuo. The promoter was