J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 118, No. 24, 22 June 2003
The reaction of ethynyl with nitrogen dioxide
11007
16 J. A. Miller and C. F. Melius, Combust. Flame 91, 21 ͑1992͒.
(2→reactants)/(2→3) at a given temperature will not be
influenced by pressure. The second association channel ͑that
leading from reactants directly to 3͒ will not exhibit redisso-
ciation. Hence the rate for this channel is controlled by the
rate of initial association ͑to 3͒. These observations are sup-
ported by our experiments that show no pressure dependence
of the rate constant between 2 and 11 Torr N2 . We also
expect that this reaction shows no pressure-dependence until
pressures much greater than 1 bar.
17 R. P. Lindstedt and G. Skevis, Symp. ͑Int.͒ Combust. ͓Proc.͔ 26, 703
͑1996͒.
18 N. M. Marinov, M. J. Castaldi, C. F. Melius, and W. Tsang, Combust. Sci.
Technol. 128, 295 ͑1997͒.
19 L. V. Moskaleva, A. M. Mebel, and M. C. Lin, Symp. ͑Int.͒ Combust.
͓Proc.͔ 26, 521 ͑1996͒.
20 W. Boullart, K. Devriendt, R. Borms, and J. Peeters, J. Phys. Chem. 100,
998 ͑1996͒.
21 M. B. Colket, Symp. ͑Int.͒ Combust. ͓Proc.͔ 21, 851 ͑1986͒.
22 C. S. McEnally and L. D. Pfefferle, Combust. Flame 115, 81 ͑1998͒.
23 H. Van Look and J. Peeters, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 16284 ͑1995͒.
24 J. Peeters, H. Van Look, and B. Ceursters, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 15124
͑1996͒.
VII. CONCLUSIONS
25 R. Sumathi, J. Peeters, and M. T. Nguyen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 287, 109
͑1998͒.
The absolute rate coefficient for the reaction C2H
ϩNO2 has been measured for the first time. The experimen-
tal temperature range covered allows reliable extrapolations
of the rate coefficient to temperatures up to 1500 K. As is
typical of many radical–radical reactions, the rate constant
for the C2HϩNO2 reaction decreases with increasing tem-
perature and also exhibits a downward curvature. This tem-
perature dependence is attributed to ͑i͒ an increased redisso-
ciation to reactants of one of the two initially formed adducts
with increasing temperature and ͑ii͒ a tightening of the en-
trance channel transition states with increasing temperature.
Because of its high rate constant, the title reaction is
expected to participate in NOx flame-chemistry at tempera-
tures below 1500 K. The likely product channels, HCN
ϩCO2 and HCCOϩNO, which are based on our qualitative
dynamical considerations, also make C2HϩNO2 a poten-
tially effective NOx reburning reaction at low temperatures
͑below 1500 K͒, although its impact will be less than the
HCCOϩNO reaction. A detailed experimental study of the
temperature dependence of the product distribution of C2H
ϩNO2 would be an aid to dynamical theories of chemical
reactions.
26 J. Peeters, B. Ceursters, H. M. T. Nguyen, and M. T. Nguyen, J. Chem.
Phys. 116, 3700 ͑2002͒.
27 J. Peeters, B. Ceursters, H. M. T. Nguyen, and M. T. Nguyen, J. Chem.
Phys. ͑to be published͒.
28 D. Sengupta, J. Peeters, and M. T. Nguyen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 283, 91
͑1998͒.
29 B. Ceursters, H. M. T. Nguyen, J. Peeters, and M. T. Nguyen, Chem. Phys.
Lett. 329, 412 ͑2000͒.
30 B. Ceursters, H. M. T. Nguyen, J. Peeters, and M. T. Nguyen, Chem. Phys.
Lett. 262, 243 ͑2000͒.
31 B. Ceursters, H. M. T. Nguyen, M. T. Nguyen, J. Peeters, and L.
Vereecken, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3, 3070 ͑2001͒.
32 K. Devriendt and J. Peeters, J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 2546 ͑1997͒.
33 K. Devriendt, H. Van Look, B. Ceursters, and J. Peeters, Chem. Phys. Lett.
261, 450 ͑1996͒.
34 A yield of 30% for CH(A 2⌬) production from the C2HϩO reaction was
given in our work ͑Ref. 33͒. This value was based on a quantum yield for
C2H production from C2H2 photodissociation at 193 nm of 0.25. However
recent publications ͓A. Lauter, K. S. Lee, K. H. Jung, R. K. Vatsa, J. P.
Mittal, and H. R. Volpp, Chem. Phys. Lett. 358, 314 ͑2002͒; F. Shokoohi,
T. A. Watson, H. Reisler, F. Kong, A. M. Renlund, and C. Wittig, J. Phys.
Chem. 90, 5695 ͑1986͔͒ show that this quantum yield is about unity.
Using this new value, our originally quoted 30% CH(A) yield should be
revised down to 8%. Thus the revised rate constant for C2HϩO
→CH(A)ϩCO is reduced from (1.8Ϯ0.7)ϫ10Ϫ11 cm3 sϪ1 to (4.5
Ϯ1.8)ϫ10Ϫ12 cm3 sϪ1
.
35 R. K. Lyon, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 8, 315 ͑1976͒.
36 L. J. Muzio, J. K. Arand, and D. P. Teixeira, Symp. ͑Int.͒ Combust. ͓Proc.͔
16, 199 ͑1977͒.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are indebted to the Fund for Scientific Re-
search ͑FWO-Vlaanderen͒, the KULeuven Research Council
͑GOA-program, and doctoral fellowship͒ for continuing fi-
nancial support.
37 R. A. Perry and D. L. Siebers, Nature ͑London͒ 324, 657 ͑1986͒.
38 R. D. Reed, U.S. Patent 1, 274, 637 ͑1969͒.
39 J. O. L. Wendt, C. V. Sterling, and M. A. Matovich, Symp. ͑Int.͒ Combust.
͓Proc.͔ 14, 897 ͑1973͒.
40 A. L. Myerson, Symp. ͑Int.͒ Combust. ͓Proc.͔ 15, 1085 ͑1975͒.
K. J. Hughes, A. S. Tomlin, E. Hampartsoumian, W. Nimmo, I. G. Zsely,
41
1 K. D. Tucker, M. L. Kutner, and P. Thaddeus, J. Astrophys. Astron. 193,
L115 ͑1974͒.
´
´
´
M. Ujvari, T. Turanyi, A. R. Clague, and M. J. Pilling, Combust. Flame
124, 573 ͑2001͒.
2 W. M. Jackson, Y. H. Bao, and R. S. Urdahl, J. Geophys. Res. ͓Planets͔
96, 17569 ͑1991͒.
42 H. M. T. Nguyen, R. Sumathi, and M. T. Nguyen, J. Phys. Chem. A 103,
5015 ͑1999͒.
3 T. I. Hasegawa and S. Kwok, Astrophys. J. 562, 824 ͑2001͒.
4 A. J. Markwick, M. Ilgner, T. J. Millar, and T. Henning, Astron. Astro-
phys. 385, 632 ͑2002͒.
43 H. M. T. Nguyen, R. Sumathi, and M. T. Nguyen, J. Phys. Chem. A 104,
1905 ͑2000͒.
44 L. Vereecken, R. Sumathy, S. A. Carl, and J. Peeters, Chem. Phys. Lett.
344, 400 ͑2001͒.
5 D. F. Strobel, Planet. Space Sci. 30, 839 ͑1982͒.
6 M. Allen, Y. L. Yung, and G. R. Gladstone, Icarus 100, 527 ͑1992͒.
7 J. O. P. Pedersen, B. J. Opansky, and S. R. Leone, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 6822
͑1993͒.
45 S. A. Carl, Q. Sun, L. Vereecken, and J. Peeters, J. Phys. Chem. A 106,
12242 ͑2002͒.
46 J. Grebe and K. H. Homann, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 86, 587 ͑1992͒,
and references therein.
8 R. J. Hoobler and S. R. Leone, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 1342 ͑1999͒.
9 S. Lee and S. R. Leone, Chem. Phys. Lett. 329, 443 ͑2000͒.
10 F. Stahl, P. V. Schleyer, H. F. Bettinger, R. I. Kaiser, Y. T. Lee, and H. F.
Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 3476 ͑2001͒.
47 P. G. Smith, J. Luque, C. Park, J. B. Jeffries, and D. R. Crosley, Combust.
Flame 131, 59 ͑2002͒, and references therein.
48 W. Boullart, M. T. Nguyen, and J. Peeters, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 8036
͑1994͒.
11 D. Carty, V. Le Page, I. R. Sims, and I. W. M. Smith, Chem. Phys. Lett.
344, 310 ͑2001͒.
49 K. T. Rim and J. F. Hershberger, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 293 ͑2000͒.
50 U. Eickhoff and R. Temps, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 243 ͑1999͒.
51 M. T. Nguyen, W. Boullart, and J. Peeters, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 8030
͑1994͒.
12 A. B. Vakhtin, D. E. Heard, I. W. M. Smith, and S. R. Leone, Chem. Phys.
Lett. 348, 21 ͑2001͒.
13 W. M. Shaub and S. H. Bauer, Combust. Flame 32, 35 ͑1978͒.
14 J. Peeters and K. Devriendt, Symp. ͑Int.͒ Combust. ͓Proc.͔ 26, 1001
͑1996͒.
52 L. Vereecken, R. Sumathi, S. A. Carl, and J. Peeters, Chem. Phys. Lett.
344, 400 ͑2001͒.
15 J. Peeters, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 106, 337 ͑1997͒.
132.204.37.217 On: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 21:11:07