4141
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 121, No. 9, 1 September 2004
NO2 multiphoton dynamics
2
ϩ
2
3
4
5
NO state was monitored by depletion of A ⌺ nЈ
A. Giusti-Suzor, F. H. Mies, L. F. DiMauro, E. Charron, and B. Yang, J.
Phys. B 28, 309 ͑1995͒.
P. H. Bucksbaum, A. Zavriyev, H. G. Muller, and D. W. Schumacher,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1883 ͑1990͒.
E. Charron, A. Giusti-Suzor, and F. H. Mies, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 7359
͑1995͒.
B. M. Garraway and K.-A. Suominen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 932 ͑1998͒; M.
Rodriguez, K.-A. Suominen, and B. M. Garraway, Phys. Rev. A 62,
2
→
X ⌸ nЈϭ0 fluorescence by an off-resonant coupling
field.
The experimental observation of the time dependence of
the fluorescence at different intensities has been interpreted
in terms of dissociation via light-induced avoided crossings
r
2
2
˜
˜
between dressed states formed from the X A , A B , and
1
2
0
53413 ͑2000͒; I. R. Sol a´ , B. Y. Chang, J. Santamar ´ı a, V. S. Malinovsky,
Rydberg 3s states of the parent molecule during the driving
field followed by suppression of the light-emitting NO
A ⌺ state by the probe field. In this scenario, absorption of
three 395–420 nm photons by NO results in population of
the Rydberg state: because NO A ⌺ is the observed final
state, it is suggested that the NO Rydberg state has 3s
character and that formation of the nЈϭ1 and 0 levels
proceeds vibrationally adiabatically during the dissociation.
Given the energetics and the intensity dependence of NO
and J. L. Krause, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4241 ͑2000͒.
H. Niikura, P. B. Corkum, and D. M. Villeneuve, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90,
6
7
2
ϩ
2
03601 ͑2003͒.
See, for example, A. Delon and R. Jost, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 5686 ͑1991͒;
10, 4300 ͑1999͒ and references therein; A. Delon, R. Jost and M. Jacon,
2
1
2
ϩ
ibid. 114, 331 ͑2001͒, and references therein.
8
2
D. K. Hsu, D. L. Monts, and R. N. Zare, Spectral Atlas of Nitrogen
Dioxide ͑Academic, New York, 1978͒, and references therein.
F. Santoro and C. Petrongolo, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 4419 ͑1999͒.
A. Delon, R. Jost, and M. Lombardi, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 5701 ͑1991͒; R.
Brandi, F. Santoro, and C. Petrongolo, Chem. Phys. 225, 55 ͑1997͒.
G. A. Brucker, S. I. Ionov, Y. Chen, and C. Wittig, Chem. Phys. Lett. 194,
301 ͑1992͒; S. I. Ionov, G. A. Brucker, C. Jaques, Y. Chen, and C. Wittig,
J. Chem. Phys. 99, 3420 ͑1993͒; C. Wittig and S. I. Ionov, ibid. 100, 4714
2
ϩ
⌺
9
0
1
2
ϩ
A ⌺ nЈϭ0 and 1 formation, two routes which permit ac-
11
2
ϩ
cess to the dissociation continuum of the 3s ⌺ Rydberg
state via a minimum number of light-induced crossings have
been invoked to explain the temporal characteristics of the
fragmentation. In the first case, generation of
͑
1994͒; S. I. Ionov, H. F. Davis, K. Mikhaylichenko, L. Valachovic, R. A.
Beadet, and C. Wittig, ibid. 101, 4809 ͑1994͒; P. I. Ionov, I. Bezel, S. I.
Ionov, and C. Wittig, Chem. Phys. Lett. 272, 257 ͑1997͒; I. Bezel, P.
Ionov, and C. Wittig, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 9267 ͑1999͒; I. Bezel, D.
Stolyarov, and C. Wittig, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 10268 ͑1999͒; D.
Stolyarov, E. Polyakova, and C. Wittig, Chem. Phys. Lett. 358, 71 ͑2002͒.
See, for example, F. X. Campos, Y. Jiang, and E. R. Grant, J. Chem. Phys.
2
ϩ
nЈϭ0 A ⌺ NO proceeds via a pair of avoided crossings
between the
͉
A,NϪ1
͘
and
͘
͘
͉X,N states and later between
dressed states. This mechanism is
characterized by a transient bond hardening which results in
ejection of a delayed burst of NO A ⌺ nЈϭ0 relative to the
͉
R,NϪ3 and
͘
͉
A,NϪ1
12
93, 2308 ͑1990͒; 93, 7731 ͑1990͒; 94, 5897 ͑1991͒; H. Matsui, E. E.
2
ϩ
Mayer, and E. R. Grant, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 175, 203 ͑1996͒; P. Bell, F.
Aguirre, E. R. Grant, and S. T. Pratt, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 10146 ͑2003͒.
T. J. Lee, Chem. Phys. Lett. 188, 154 ͑1992͒.
J. A. Davies, J. E. LeClaire, R. E. Continetti, and C. C. Hayden, J. Chem.
Phys. 111, 1 ͑1999͒; J. A. Davies, R. E. Continetti, D. W. Chandler, and C.
C. Hayden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5983 ͑2000͒.
time of maximum field strength. In the second case, resulting
1
1
3
4
2
ϩ
in formation of NO A ⌺ nЈϭ1, it is postulated that the
majority of trajectories leading to the final state proceeds
directly over the barrier formed by the avoided crossing be-
states, which gives rise to a
sharper fluorescence decay as a function of pump-probe time
delay. The experimental results suggest, in addition, that for-
mation of nЈϭ1 NO A ⌺ also occurs to some extent by
the same mechanism as that responsible for NO A ⌺
nЈϭ0 molecules. For both routes, population transfer to the
1
1
5
6
tween the
͉
R,NϪ3
͘
and
͉
X,N
͘
A. Hishikawa, A. Iwamae, and K. Yamanouchi, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 8871
͑
1999͒.
R. B. L o´ pez-Martens, T. W. Schmidt, and G. Roberts, J. Chem. Phys. 111,
183 ͑1999͒.
7
2
ϩ
17
K. P. Huber and G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure
IV: Constants of Diatomic Molecules ͑Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York,
2
ϩ
1979͒, pp. 466–480.
18
2
ϩ
͑a͒ R. B. L o´ pez-Martens, T. W. Schmidt, and G. Roberts, Phys. Rev. A 62,
13414 ͑2000͒; ͑b͒ T. W. Schmidt, R. B. L o´ pez-Martens, and G. Roberts,
3
s ⌺ Rydberg state occurs across LIPs generated during
0
the period spanned by the driving field, whose dressing effect
is augmented during temporal overlap with the probe field;
after the two pulses have separated in time, the probe acts to
J. Phys. B 37, 1125 ͑2004͒.
1
2
9
0
L. G. Piper and L. M. Cowles, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 2419 ͑1986͒; J. Luque
and D. R. Crosley, ibid. 111, 7405 ͑1999͒ and references therein.
S. Pedersen, T. Baumert, and A. H. Zewail, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 12460
2
ϩ
2
suppress A ⌺ →X ⌸ fluorescence from the nascent NO.
r
͑
1993͒; A. Materny, J. L. Herek, P. Cong, and A. H. Zewail, ibid. 98, 3352
The time required for three-photon dissociation of NO to
2
͑1994͒; M. Blackwell, P. Ludowise, and Y. Chen, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 283
2
ϩ
3
give NO A ⌺ and O P at Terawatt intensities is found to
͑1997͒.
21
S. Mahapatra, H. Koppel, L. S. Cederbaum, P. Stampfuss, and W. Wenzel,
¨
be of the same order of magnitude as that for NO →NO
2
2
3
14
Chem. Phys. 259, 211 ͑2000͒.
C ⌸ ϩO P probed at perturbative intensities.
r
22
͑
͑
a͒ E. Haller, H. K o¨ ppel and L. S. Cederbaum, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 111, 377
1985͒; ͑b͒ E. Leonardi, C. Petrongolo, G. Hirsch, and R. J. Buenker, J.
Chem. Phys. 105, 9051 ͑1996͒; ͑c͒ S. Y. Grebenschikov, C. Beck, H.
Fl o¨ thmann, R. Schinke, and S. Kato, ibid. 111, 619 ͑1999͒; ͑d͒ V. Kurkal,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
P. Fleurat-Lessard, and R. Schinke, ibid. 119, 1489 ͑2003͒.
T.W.S. acknowledges Churchill College Cambridge for a
research studentship and the University of Sydney for an
Eleanora Sophia Wood Travelling Scholarship, and
R.B.L.-M. acknowledges EPSRC for the award of a research
studentship. This work was supported by EPSRC, the Isaac
Newton Trust, and the Royal Society of London through
generous equipment grants.
2
3
G. Hirsch, R. J. Buenker, and C. Petrongolo, Mol. Phys. 73, 1085 ͑1991͒.
S. J. Klippenstein and T. Radivoyevitch, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 3644 ͑1993͒.
H. Katagiri and S. Kato, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 8805 ͑1993͒.
24
2
2
5
6
G. Hirsch, R. J. Buenker, and C. Petrongolo, Mol. Phys. 70, 835 ͑1990͒;
76, 1261 ͑1992͒.
27
E. Leonardi, C. Petrongolo, V. Keshari, G. Hirsch, and R. J. Buenker, Mol.
Phys. 82, 553 ͑1994͒; R. F. Salzgeber, V. Mandelshtam, Ch. Schlier, and
H. S. Taylor, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 937 ͑1998͒; L. B. Harding, H. Stark, J.
Troe, and V. G. Ushakov, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 63 ͑1999͒.
2
2
8
9
͑
a͒ G. Bryant, Y. Jiang, and E. R. Grant, Chem. Phys. Lett. 200, 495
1
See, for example: B. M. Garraway and K.-A. Suominen, Rep. Prog. Phys.
͑1992͒; ͑b͒ G. K. Jarvis, Y. Song, C. Y. Ng, and E. R. Grant, J. Chem.
Phys. 111, 9568 ͑1999͒.
See, for example, G. P. Bryant, Y. Jiang, M. Martin, and E. R. Grant, J.
5
8, 365 ͑1995͒; C. Wunderlich, E. Kobler, H. Figger, and T. W. H a¨ nsch,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2333 ͑1997͒.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
28.59.226.54 On: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:32:48
1