TRANSESTERIFICATION OF DIMETHYLCARBONATE AND PHENOL
CONCLUSION
313
Silica-supported titania was the active catalyst for the
synthesis of methylphenylcarbonate (MPC) from dimethyl-
carbonate (DMC) and phenol in the gas phase. The amount
of surface Ti(IV) species highly dispersed due to a strong
interaction of titania and silica increased with Ti loadings
and got saturated above 10 wt% . This surface Ti(IV) species
was directly responsible for the selective synthesis of MPC
by the gas phase transesterification of DMC and phenol.
The crystalline TiO2 anatase phase was also an active and
selective catalyst for gas phase transesterification, yet it also
decreased the catalyst activity through the loss of surface
area caused by coking.
FIG. 7. The surface area of Ti obtained by the multiplication of the
steady state BET surface area and the surface concentration of Ti by quan-
titative XPS analysis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work has been supported by LG Chemicals Ltd. and Korean Sci-
ence and Engineering Foundation through the Research Center for Cata-
lytic Technology of Pohang University of Science and Technology.
REFERENCES
shown in Fig. 6. In order to demonstrate this point, the mul-
tiplication product of surface titanium concentration mea-
sured by XPS and BET surface area of used catalysts was
plotted against Ti loadings in Fig. 7. The product should be
proportional to the absolute amount of surface TiO2 taking
part in the catalytic reaction. The plot showed a remark-
able resemblance with the curve of phenol conversion vs
Ti loading. This supports our proposition that total surface
titanium sites are responsible for the catalytic transesterifi-
cation of phenol and dimethylcarbonate. The active Ti(IV)
species are present in the forms of a monolayer and bulk
crystals of the anatase structure or in tetrahedral and octa-
hedral symmetries.
In Fig. 7, it is evident that the decrease in BET sur-
face area is responsible for the reduced phenol conversions
when Ti loading is increased above 10 wt% . As shown in
Fig. 6, surface area of TiO2/SiO2 catalyst decreases as Ti
loading is increased. However, the decrease in the surface
area with Ti loading is not that great for fresh catalysts be-
fore the reaction. However, the decrease becomes much
greater after the transesterification at 703 K for 8.5 h and
thus the surface area difference between the fresh and used
catalysts has become greater for higher Ti loadings. In a
separate study to be published elsewhere, it has been found
that the cause of the surface area reduction for used cata-
lysts is coking (16). The presence of coke was confirmed by
surface analysis with XPS, temperature-programmed reac-
tion with H2, and the measurement of pore-size distribution
by N2 adsorption. Thus, Fig. 6 indicates that coking is more
favorable on catalysts with higher Ti loadings. Since these
catalysts contain more bulk TiO2 than catalysts with lower
Ti loadings, it could be concluded that bulk TiO2 promotes
coking more effectively than monolayer Ti phase.
1. Chem. Br. 30(12), 970 (1994).
2. Curtius, U., Bottoenbruch, L., and Schnell, H., U.S. patent 3 442 854
(1969).
3. Yamana, H., Kuni, T., Furusawa, T., Nakai, H., and Hiro, Y., U.S. patent
3 888 826 (1975).
4. Brunelle, D., U.S. patent 4 321 356 (1982).
5. Starr, J. B., and Ko, A., U.S. patent 4 383 092 (1983).
6. Komiya, K., Fukuoka, S., Aminaka, M., Hasegawa, K., Hachiya, H.,
Okamoto, H., Watanabe, T., Yoneda, H., Fukawa, I., and Dozono,
T., in “Green Chemistry: Designing Chemistry for the Environment”
(P. T. Anastas and T. C. Williamson, Eds.), p. 20. ACS, Washington,
1996.
7. Cusumano, J. A., Chemtech 22(8), 482 (1992).
8. Fukuoka, S., Tojo, M., and Kawamura, M., U.S. patent 5 210 268 (1993).
9. Harrison, G. E., Dennis, A. J., and Sharif, M., U.S. patent 5 426 207
(1995).
10. Murata, K., Kawahashi, K., and Watabiki, M., U.S. Patent 5 380 908
(1995).
11. Fu, Z.-h., and Ono, Y., J. Mol. Catal. A 118, 293 (1997).
12. Tundo, P., Trotta, F., Moraglio, G., and Ligorati, F., Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 27, 1565 (1988).
13. Kim, W. B., MS thesis, Pohang Univ. of Science and Technology, 1998.
14. Kim, W. B., and Lee, J. S., Catal. Lett., in press.
15. Teo, B. K., “EXAFS: Basic Principles and Data Analysis.” Springer,
Berlin, 1985.
16. Kim, W. B., Kim, Y. G., and Lee, J. S., Appl. Catal. A, submitted for
publication.
17. Bordiga, S., Coluccia, S., Lamberti, C., Marchese, L., and Zecchina,
A., J. Phys. Chem. 98, 4125 (1994).
18. Rhee, C. H., and Lee, J. S., Catal. Today 38, 213 (1997).
19. Liley, P. E., Reid, R. C., and Buck, E., in “Perry’s Chemical Engineers’
Handbook” (R. H. Perry and D. Green, Eds.), 6th ed., Section 3, p. 276.
McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1984.
20. Stranick, M. A., Houalla, M., and Hercules, D. M., J. Catal. 106, 362
(1987).
21. Castillo, R., Koch, B., Ruiz, P., and Delmon, B., J. Catal. 161, 524 (1996).
22. Lassaletta, G., Fernandez, A., Espinos, J. P., and Gonzalez-Elipe, A. R.,
J. Phys. Chem. 99, 1484 (1995).