Organic Letters
Letter
Subsequently, we successfully adapted our previously
reported conditions to the cross-coupling of a BCP RAE
(1,3-dioxoisoindolin-2-yl bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane-1-carboxylate)
with 4-((4-bromophenyl)sulfonyl)morpholine in modest yield
(Table S1 of the Supporting Information). The addition of a
mild base, such as NaHCO3 or K2HPO4, improved the cross-
coupling yield by diminishing the loss of the BCP radical to
Minisci-type addition (SI-21) to Hantzsch pyridine, which is
generated upon photoaromatization.
With suitable conditions established (see the Supporting
Information for full optimization details), we proceeded to
investigate the scope of aryl bromides amenable to the cross-
coupling protocol (1−16, Scheme 1). In general, the best
yields were obtained using aryl bromides bearing electron-
withdrawing groups. Modest product formation was observed
with electron-rich and electron-neutral aryl bromides because
of competitive proto-debromination. Electrophilic and protic
functional groups were well-tolerated (in contrast with cross-
coupling methods based on organometallic reagents), includ-
ing several synthetic handles found in substrates such as
boronate 4, chloride 5, ester 7, and amide 15. Selected
heteroaromatic bromides were accommodated and did not
engage in Minisci-type side reactivity, giving modest to
synthetically acceptable cross-coupling yields (17−23). Of
particular note, pyridine 20 bears a 2-Cl handle for
diversification via SNAr, and the successful preparation of
furan 23 was made possible by this net-reductive cross-
electrophile platform. Importantly, these reductively and
oxidatively sensitive systems are traditionally challenging
structures in cross-couplings mediated by external photoredox
catalysts, further underscoring the selectivity using the EDA
paradigm. Finally, comparable reactivity was observed for
product 16 using 3.3 mmol (1.0 g) of aryl bromide instead of
0.5 mmol.
In further investigations using 4-((4-bromophenyl)sulfonyl)-
morpholine as a standard aryl bromide, the method was
demonstrated to be amenable to a wide range of BCP RAEs
with varying bridgehead substitutions (24−31). In particular,
very few BCP−aryl compounds with amino-(27),26−29 Cl-
(28),8 CF3-(29),30 CN-(30),28 and F-(33)31 bridgehead
substitutions have been reported, and to our knowledge,
none have been prepared via direct cross-coupling. Further-
more, the current method is proven to be more versatile than
that of VanHeyst, Qi, and co-workers,14 who were unsuccessful
in employing NHBoc-, CF3-, and CN-BCP trifluoroborates in
Ni/photoredox cross-coupling. Finally, we underscored the
utility of the method by engaging the BCP radical with several
bromides bearing functionally dense, medicinally relevant
structures (37−44). Under the developed conditions, late-
stage functionalization of diverse scaffolds can be accom-
plished, including aryl chloride 37, imidazole 38, quinoline 42,
quinazoline 43, and urea 44. Notably, tertiary amines (40 and
42), often present in biologically active substances to modulate
pharmacokinetic properties but typically susceptible to SET
oxidation with traditional photoredox catalysts, can be
accessed, albeit in low yields.34
Figure 1. Comparison of two- and one-electron strategies to forge
BCP−aryl cross-coupling products.
shortcomings, we envisioned employing bench stable,
commercially available BCP carboxylic acid feedstocks under
mild, Ni-catalyzed photochemical conditions.16
The initial goal was to use carboxylic acids directly in Ni/
photoredox dual cross-coupling. Encouragingly, we established
suitable conditions for the decarboxylation of a BCP
carboxylate and verified that the resultant BCP radical engages
in defluorinative alkylation with a trifluoromethyl-substituted
alkene (Scheme S1A of the Supporting Information).
However, adapting these conditions to Ni-catalyzed C−C
bond formation with 4-bromobenzonitrile failed to generate
the desired arylated BCP product.
Under dilute reaction conditions (0.025 M instead of 0.1
M), the corresponding BCP aryl ester was observed exclusively
(Scheme S1B of the Supporting Information). This result can
be rationalized by the high s character of the BCP−carboxylate
bond (∼sp2.1),6 resulting in a slower rate of decarboxylation,
thus favoring an energy-transfer-dependent C−O coupling.17,18
These results motivated us to investigate the activation of
BCP−N-(acyloxy)phthalimide RAEs, bench-stable solids that
are readily prepared from the corresponding carboxylic acids
via a quantitative Steglich esterification. These derivatives
undergo decarboxylative radical fragmentation upon single-
electron reduction19 through photochemical strategies that are
unavailable to the parent carboxylic acids.20 In this vein, our
group recently reported the nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling of
primary- and secondary alkyl RAEs with (hetero)aryl halides
using Hantzsch ester (HE) as a potent organic photo-
reductant.20 The intermediacy of a photoactive electron
donor−acceptor (EDA) complex21−25 was envisioned to
facilitate the generation and subsequent functionalization of
BCP radicals in a Ni-catalyzed cross-electrophile paradigm,
bypassing the need for preformed carbon nucleophiles as well
as electron transfer events from exogenous photoredox
catalysts. In addition, the developed protocol would provide
a low barrier for practical implementation in medicinal
chemistry settings.
To lend evidence for the intermediacy of an EDA complex,
we measured ultraviolet/visible (UV/vis) absorption spectra
for individual reaction components and mixtures thereof
(Figure 2B). Although the RAE (violet line) and HE (golden
line) absorb in the visible light region, they undergo a
bathochromic shift (blue line) when combined, indicating the
presence of charge-transfer aggregates. Indeed, the color
4829
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 4828−4833