Organic Letters
Letter
Table 1. Optimization
Table 2. Substrate Scope for Inverse Hydroboration
a
Reactions of Imines
a
entry
light or initiator
CFL
CFL
CFL
thiol or disulfide
temp
yield
c
b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PhSSPh (0.1 equiv)
none
BnSSBn (0.1 equiv)
−
−
−
88% (78%)
0%
c
c
0%
none (under dark) PhSSPh (0.1 equiv) 80 °C
10%
97%
91%
24%
59%
0%
AIBN (0.1 equiv)
AIBN (0.1 equiv)
AIBN (0.1 equiv)
AIBN (0.1 equiv)
AIBN (0.1 equiv)
PhSH (0.1 equiv)
PhSH (0.2 equiv)
BnSH (0.1 equiv)
BnSH (0.2 equiv)
none
80 °C
80 °C
80 °C
80 °C
80 °C
a
Determined by 1H NMR using CHCl2CHCl2 as an internal
b
standard. Isolated yield after silica gel column chromatography.
c
The reaction was conducted at room temperature. However, the
solution temp was increased using CFL to around 33 °C.
under irradiation from a 12 W white CFL (compact
fluorescence lamp) for 14 h. The target product 3a was
formed in 88% NMR yield and was isolated in 78% yield after
column chromatography on silica gel (entry 1). No borylation
product was observed in the absence of disulfide (entry 2).
Importantly, BnSSBn is not an effective additive (entry 3).
To understand why PhSSPh succeeds and BnSSBn fails, we
conducted control experiments that omitted the imine. CFL
irradiation of PhSSPh and 2 gave diMeImd-BH2(SPh) and
diMeImd-BH(SPh)2.15 In contrast, the reaction of BnSSBn
with 2 afforded only trace amounts of NHC-boryl sulfides.
These results suggest that PhSSPh is absorbing a little light
from CFL to form an initial thiyl radical.
a
1 (0.5 mmol), 2 (0.6 mmol), PhSSPh (0.05 mmol), CFL (12 W),
b
MeCN (2.5 mL), 14 h. Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy using
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethame as an internal standard. Yield of product,
isolated after flash column chromatography on SiO2, is given in
c
We next explored thermal reactions at 80 °C in the dark. In
these, we used thiols in place of disulfides. Heating of 1, 2a,
and 0.1 equiv of PhSSPh gave 3a in only 10% yield (entry 4).
Thermal initiation of PhSSPh is not effective.15 However,
when the traditional initiator AIBN was added, 3a was formed
in good yields (entries 5 and 6). The thermal reaction with
BnSH gave poor results (entries 7 and 8). This difference in
the reactivity may be based on the bond dissociation energies
(BDEBnS−H = 86.9 kcal mol−1 vs BDEPhS−H = 79.1 kcal
mol−1).16 This is suggested that the hydrogen abstraction by
the iminyl radical from BnS−H would not proceed efficiently.
No product was formed when AIBN was added and the thiol
was omitted (entry 9). Taken together, these experiments
support the notion that a radical chain is operating in both
thermal and photoreactions and that PhSSPh is a precursor of
PhSH in the photoreactions.
parentheses.
forded α-amino boranes 3h−3j in 95%, 82%, and 69% yields,
respectively (entries 8−10). The reaction of imines 1k and 1l,
which are prepared from 4-bromoaniline, also worked well
(entries 11 and 12). The imines, which were prepared from the
combination of aliphatic aldehydes with aliphatic or aromatic
amines and aromatic aldehydes with aliphatic amines, were not
suitable for this inverse hydroboration reaction in optimized
conditions (Table 1, entry 1).
Finally, we conducted a gram-scale reaction of 1h (4.34
mmol) under the standard conditions (Scheme 1). This
furnished 3h in 79% yield (1.17 g) after evaporation and flash
chromatography.
Next we explored the generality of this simple radical
borylation of imines (Table 2). The reaction of 1b gave
corresponding product in 87% yield (entry 2). Substrates
having halogen atoms at para, meta, and ortho positions, 1c−
1g, gave the corresponding products 3c−3g in good yields
(entries 3−7). The selectivity with aryl bromides (entries 5−7)
is significant; no dehydrobromination products14 were
observed in these reactions. The reaction of imines 1h−1j,
which were prepared from aniline with 2-naphthaldehyde, 3-
pyridinecarboxaldehyde, and thiophene-3-carbaldehyde, af-
Scheme 1. Gram Scale Reaction
1826
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 1825−1828