Concise Article
MedChemComm
the injection syringe. The number of aliquots was 70 up to 93. At
higher aliquot numbers an injection volume of 3 mL was used, at
lower aliquot numbers 4 mL were titrated into the sample cell.
An interval of 540 s was used between titration steps. The
sample was stirred by the syringe during titration with stirring
3 P. Boullanger, in Glycoscience Synthesis of Substrate Analogs
and Mimetics, ed. D. H. Driguez and P. D. J. Thiem,
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997, pp. 275–312.
4 N. Jayaraman, K. Maiti and K. Naresh, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013,
42, 4640–4656.
speed 300 rpm. Experiments were carried out at 298 K (shield
5 P. M. Levine, T. P. Carberry, J. M. Holub and
K. Kirshenbaum, Med. Chem. Commun., 2013, 4, 493–509.
6 T. K. Lindhorst and S. Kubik, in Supramolecular Chemistry:
From Molecules to Nanomaterials, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,
ꢂ1
297 K) and a reference power of 10 mcal s . Every titration was
performed three times and then it was averaged (cf. ESI† for
representative titration curves).
2
012, pp. 1685–1712.
C. Stubenrauch, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 2001, 6,
60–170.
P. H. Thiesen, H. Rosenfeld, P. Konidala, V. M. Garamus,
L. He, A. Prange and B. Niemeyer, J. Biotechnol., 2006, 124,
7
8
Cleaning of the injection syringe and the cells
1
Aer draining off residual solution, the syringe was washed with
100 mL of double distilled water and 50 mL methanol (HPLC
grade). Using the ThermoVac the syringe was dried for 10 min
under vacuum and maintained at reduced pressure for least 1 h
until the next measurement was performed. The sample cell
was rst washed with Contrad 70 liquid detergent (10% in
double distilled water) and subsequently with double distilled
water (twice 300 mL) using the ThermoVac.
284–301.
9
M. Corti, L. Cant u` , P. Brocca and E. Del Favero, Curr. Opin.
Colloid Interface Sci., 2007, 12, 148–154.
0 G. Milkereit, V. M. Garamus, S. Gerber and R. Willumeit,
Langmuir, 2007, 23, 11488–11495.
1 J. R. Livingstone, Nature, 1996, 384, 491–492.
2 A. Ababou and J. E. Ladbury, J. Mol. Recognit., 2006, 19, 79–
1
1
1
Data analysis
89.
1
1
3 M. Durka, K. Buffet, J. Iehl, M. Holler, J.-F. Nierengarten,
J. Taganna, J. Bouckaert and S. P. Vincent, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 1321–1323.
4 L. Pang, S. Kleeb, K. Lemme, S. Rabbani, M. Scharenberg,
A. Zalewski, F. Sch ¨a dler, O. Schwardt and B. Ernst,
ChemMedChem, 2012, 7, 1404–1422.
For measurements and data analysis ORIGIN 7.2 (OriginLab)
with ITC plugin was used. The reference data of a water-to-water
titration were subtracted and the resulting data were plotted.
From the resulting curves, the critical micelle concentration
(cmc) was obtained as the maximum of the rst derivative.
1
1
1
1
5 H. Heerklotz and A. Blume, in Comprehensive Biophysics, ed.
E. H. Egelman, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2012, pp. 63–91.
6 S. Paula, W. Sues, J. Tuchtenhagen and A. Blume, J. Phys.
Chem., 1995, 99, 11742–11751.
7 P. Garidel, A. Hildebrand, R. Neubert and A. Blume,
Langmuir, 2000, 16, 5267–5275.
Diffusion NMR spectroscopy
The NMR diffusion measurements were carried out on a Bruker
Avance 600 spectrometer at a temperature of 298 K. A concen-
tration series of octyl a-D-mannopyranoside (1, 11 concentra-
tions from 2.5 to 250 mM) and octyl b-D-mannopyranoside (2, 12
concentrations from 10 to 250 mM) were measured in 500 mL
D O. At every concentration, a series of H NMR spectra was
2
8 B. Focher, G. Savelli, G. Torri, G. Vecchio, D. C. McKenzie,
D. F. Nicoli and C. A. Bunton, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1989, 158,
1
recorded (32 spectra) with a decreasing eld gradient. The
parameters of the duration of the gradient d and the separation
between the leading edges of the pulsed gradients D (diffusion
time) were adjusted for each sample so that the signal intensity
of the last spectra was about 10% of the starting intensity. The
analysis of the diffusion series was performed using the T /T -
4
91–494.
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
9 S. Matsumura, K. Imai, S. Yoshikawa, K. Kawada and
T. Uchibor, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 1990, 67, 996–1001.
0 K. Kameyama and T. Takagi, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1990,
137, 1–10.
1
2
1 L. He, V. Garamus, S. S. Funari, M. Malfois, R. Willumeit and
B. Niemeyer, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 7596–7604.
2 M. Frindi, B. Michels and R. Zana, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96,
relaxation routine of TOPSPIN 3.2 (Bruker).
8
137–8141.
3 C. Jolicoeur and P. R. Philip, Can. J. Chem., 1974, 52, 1834–
839.
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Dr. F. D. S ¨o nnichsen and Dipl.-Chem. H. Kobarg
for their support in NMR diffusion experiments. Valuable
discussions with V. Baronin Sta ¨e l von Holstein, Dipl.-Ing. are
gratefully acknowledged.
1
4 H.-D. Dorer, Grenzachen und kolloid-disperse Systeme:
Physik und Chemie, Springer DE, 2002.
5 M. Gomez-Garcıa, J. M. Benito, D. Rodrıguez-Lucena,
J.-X. Yu, K. Chmurski, C. Ortiz Mellet, R. Guti ´e rrez Gallego,
A. Maestre, J. Defaye and J. M. Garc ´ı a Fern ´a ndez, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 7970–7971.
¨
¨
´
´
´
Notes and references
1
2
R. A. Dwek, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 683–720.
D. B. Werz, R. Ranzinger, S. Herget, A. Adibekian, C.-W. von
26 P. del Burgo, E. Junquera and E. Aicart, Langmuir, 2004, 20,
1587–1596.
der Lieth and P. H. Seeberger, ACS Chem. Biol., 2007, 2, 685– 27 A. Lainez, P. del Burgo, E. Junquera and E. Aicart, Langmuir,
91. 2004, 20, 5745–5752.
6
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Med. Chem. Commun., 2014, 5, 1218–1226 | 1225