Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
effect should be greatest when the packing is located at the centre
of the tube—i.e. where the temperature is greatest. Three common
packing materials were studied for their effect on the 1→2 conver-
sion, viz. silica tubes, silica wool and porcelain chips and in all
cases the whole section of the tube was packed.
22–25; 450 °C pyrolysis temperature; 7–9% conversion in the
absence of packing). Again the effect was greatest when the pack-
ing was at the trap end of the furnace tube (46% conversion) but
there was rather less distinction compared with the run in which the
packing was placed in the centre of the tube (39% conversion). In
this case packing at inlet end of furnace tube increased the conver-
sion significantly (to 23%) which suggests that the porcelain may
be a more efficient ‘pre-heater’ than the silica used in the previous
experiments.
These results show that relatively short sections of inert pack-
ing material within the furnace tube of an FVP experiment can
dramatically influence the conversion to products, particularly
when the packing is located away from the centre of the tube at the
trap end of the furnace. In the first place, the furnace temperature
can be reduced, but because the major effect seems to be an increase
in the contact time, this does not mean that ‘milder’ conditions are
experienced by substrate molecules. Perhaps more important, the
reduction in the temperature range required for complete conver-
sion to products may give the opportunity for much finer control,
particularly if two or more successive thermal processes can take
place.
As shown in Fig. 2, (and Table 1, entries 12–17) the major effect
of packing the centre of the furnace tube longitudinally with small
silica tubes (stack of 8 tubes, each 5 × 0.6 cm) is to narrow the
temperature range of the conversion. Thus a temperature increase
of only ca. 50 °C is required to increase the conversion from 10%
to >90% (c.f. the 150 °C range required in the absence of the pack-
ing). This implies that the packing has the effect of equalising the
energies of the precursor molecules (i.e. the half-height width of the
Boltzmann distribution is reduced). This may be due to disruption
of the flow in the centre of the tube so that all the molecules experi-
ence a similar (increased) number of surface collisions. Although
the temperature of onset of reaction is not significantly affected by
this packing, complete conversion to products is observed at 500 °C
rather than at 650 °C in the absence of the packing. These results
suggest that such packing might be used to minimise the effect of
secondary, subsequent pyrolysis processes on an initial reaction.
At low conversions, the position of the packing in the tube has
relatively little influence (Table 1 entries 13, 16 and 17), though
it appears that the major effect is not found when the packing is
located at the centre of the furnace tube.
This trend was even more apparent when silica wool (1.3 g,
spread along a ca. 5 cm length of tube) was used as the packing
material (Table 1, entries 18–21 and Fig. 4). For these experiments,
full temperature–conversion plots were not carried out, but the
effects of various packing configurations on the conversions at
450 °C were monitored. The silica wool has a much larger surface
area than the tubes, but if a surface reaction is involved, the effect
would be expected to be greatest where the surface is hottest—i.e.
when the wool is placed in the centre of the tube. In the event, the
conversion from 1 to 2 at 450 °C was increased from 7–9% (in the
absence of packing, or with packing at the inlet end of the furnace
tube) to 31% (with packing in the centre of the tube) but was further
increased to 80% when the packing was placed at the trap end of
the furnace tube. It is clear from these results that (i) silica wool has
a greater effect on the conversion than silica tubes; (ii) an increase
in the number of molecular collisions at the inlet end of the tube
(i.e. in a pre-heating zone) has little influence on the conversion;
(iii) the major effect is seen when the packing is at the trap end
and not when it is in the centre of the furnace tube. This suggests
that there is no ‘surface’phenomenon involved with ‘inert’packing
materials such as silica, and instead the major influence must be a
reduction in flow rate causing an increase in contact time. The effect
of this increase in contact time is greatest when the molecules are
forced to spend this period in the hottest zone of the furnace.
5. Effect of ‘catalysts’ in the furnace
Surprisingly little systematic work has been carried out on the use
of solid-phase catalysts in the short contact time gas-phase FVP
experiment,13 though solid-phase reagents have been employed
in the VGSR (Vacuum Gas-Solid Reaction) technique.2 In one
interesting application, Storr and co-workers used silica tubes
coated with TLC-grade silica-gel, and observed substantial
reduction in furnace temperatures for dehydration and related
reactions.14 The model reaction 1→2 involves consecutive elimina-
tion, (thought to be via an intramolecular concerted process) and
electrocyclisation and it is not clear that surface catalysis should
accelerate either step of this process. In the event, a very significant
effect was observed when Storr’s conditions were used [Table 1,
entries 26–28, (silica tubes at trap end of furnace) and Fig. 4]
such that the temperature for complete conversion was reduced
to 400 °C, some 250 °C lower than with an empty tube. In this set
of experiments, the steep temperature dependence found for silica
tubes centrally located in the furnace was not found (Fig. 2), but it
is anticipated that a greater effect may be observed if the ‘catalyst’
is placed in the hottest (centre) zone of the furnace tube. It is clear
that a more systematic study of catalytic conditions may provide an
added dimension to the FVP experiment and significantly increase
the utility of the method in synthesis. Further examples will be
reported in future publications.
6. Intermolecular reactions—the coupling of
benzyl radicals
FVP reactions are dominated by intramolecular processes. Of
the few intermolecular reactions which are preparatively useful,
most are dimerisations of reactive species such as carbenes or
radicals. Yet not all radicals dimerise. Phenyl radicals generally
undergo hydrogen atom capture whereas benzyl radicals couple
to give excellent yields of bibenzyls.15 It was therefore of interest
to understand the mechanism of such dimerisations more precisely
and in particular to define the region(s) of furnace and trap where
the actual coupling reaction takes place. In very early work, Hedaya
and McNeil have shown that the level of the cross-coupling reaction
of cyclopentadienyl and allyl radicals could be reduced by locating
the trap at a greater distance from the furnace exit, which suggests
that—in their system—the coupling reaction takes place in the cold
trap under standard conditions.16 In addition, benzyl radicals (gene-
rated by FVP of benzyl bromide) can survive as far as a neon matrix
where they can be detected by EPR spectroscopy.17 However, the
apparatus used for these experiments may be very different from
that in use today for ‘preparative’ FVP experiments.
Fig. 4 Temperature–conversion plot for 1→2 using an empty furnace
tube, using silica wool packing at various points in the furnace tube and
using a furnace tube containing a packing of silica gel ‘catalyst’ (trap end).
In one experiment in which the whole furnace tube was packed
with silica wool (Table 1, entry 21), the packing proved to be too
dense for effective gaseous flow through the furnace and only a
small amount of product (with high conversion) was obtained.
Broadly similar results were obtained when porcelain chips
(20 g, filling a ca. 5 cm segment of the furnace tube, held in place
with silica wool) were used as the packing material (Table 1, entries
The dimerisation of benzyl radicals 8, generated by pyrolysis of
oxalate esters18 (e.g. 7) (Scheme 3) to give bibenzyl 9 was therefore
2 6 8 0
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 4 , 2 , 2 6 7 7 – 2 6 8 3