SCHEME 1
Direct Synthesis of Polysubstituted Quinoline
Derivatives by InBr3-Promoted Dimerization of
2-Ethynylaniline Derivatives
Norio Sakai,* Kimiyoshi Annaka, and Takeo Konakahara*
Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science
and Technology, Tokyo UniVersity of Science (RIKADAI),
Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan
SCHEME 2
ReceiVed February 6, 2006
InBr3 promotes the dimerization of 2-ethynylaniline deriva-
tives containing an unsubstituted terminal carbon leading to
the production of polysubstituted quinoline derivatives in
good yield.
(III) halide as a model reaction. Table 1 shows the results of
the search for optimized conditions. In a preliminary investiga-
tion,5 methanol was found to be the best solvent for this reaction.
When the reaction was conducted using a catalytic amount of
indium bromide in 1 M methanol solution, the yield of the
desired product, 3a, was moderate (entries 1 and 2). However,
when a stoichiometric amount of InBr3 was used, the reaction
proceeded cleanly without any byproducts being produced, and
the yield was further improved to 90% (entry 3). On the other
hand, changing the In catalyst to either InCl3, InI3, or In(OTf)3
resulted in slightly lower yields (entries 4-6). Needless to say,
in the absence of the indium salt, no cyclization occurred (entry
7). Consequently, we found that refluxing methanol in the
presence of a stoichiometric amount of InBr3 gave the best
results for the mutual cyclization. In this context, when the
reaction was performed with a substrate having a trimethylsilyl
group at a terminal alkyne carbon in the presence of the indium
salt, the same product 3a was produced in 50% yield.6
In a previous study,1 we reported on the InBr3-catalyzed
intramolecular cyclization of a variety of 2-ethynylanilines
leading to the preparation of 2-substituted indole derivatives
(path a in Scheme 1). However, when the reaction was carried
out using a substrate with a trimethylsilyl group or with no
substituent group on the terminal carbon under optimal condi-
tions, the desired indole product was not produced. Instead, a
small amount of an unidentified product was isolated. To
determine its structure, the crystalline product was subjected to
an X-ray crystallographic analysis. The X-ray analysis of the
crystalline product indicated the quinoline skeleton, formed by
the dimerization of the ethynylaniline derivative (see Figure 1
in Supporting Information).2 Herein, we report on a further study
of this reaction, which led to the development of a facile
synthesis of quinoline derivatives from this type of ethynyl-
aniline derivative via the use of an indium salt (path b in Scheme
1).3 The synthesis of polysubstituted quinolines is of consider-
able interest in the fields of organic and pharmaceutical
chemistry.4
(3) For selected reviews and papers on reactions mediated by indium,
see: (a) Marshall, J. A.; Hinkle, K. W. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1920. (b)
Yasuda, M.; Miyai, T.; Shibata, I.; Baba, A.; Nomura, R.; Matsuda, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 9497. (c) Loh, T.-P.; Wei, L.-L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 323. (d) Chauhan, K. K.; Frost, C. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 2000, 3015. (e) Ranu, B. C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 2347. (f)
Yasuda, M.; Onishi, Y.; Ueba, M.; Miyai, T.; Baba, A. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
66, 7741. (g) Bandini, M.; Melchiorre, P.; Melloni, A.; Umani-Ronchi, A.
Synthesis 2002, 1110. (h) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Raju, A. K.; Rao,
C. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5437. (i) Sakai, N.; Hirasawa, M.;
Konakahara, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4171. (j) Sakai, N.; Hirasawa,
M.; Konakahara, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6407. (k) Sakai, N.; Kanada,
R.; Hirasawa, M.; Konakahara, T. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 9298.
Initially, 2-ethynylaniline derivatives, 2a-f, as reaction
substrates were prepared via a Sonogashira-coupling reaction
between 2-iodoaniline derivatives and trimethylsilylacetylene
and a subsequent deprotection of the TMS group from the
anilines, 1a-f, obtained (Scheme 2). We then investigated the
dimerization of 2-ethynylaniline (2a) in the presence of indium-
(4) (a) Joule, J. A.; Mills, K. Heterocyclic Chemistry, 4th ed.; Blackwell
Science, Ltd.: Oxford, 2000; pp 121-150. (b) Balasubramanian, M.; Keay,
J. G. ComprehensiVe Heterocyclic Chemistry II; Katritzky, A. R., Rees, C.
W., Scriven, E. F. V., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1996; Vol. 5, pp
245-300. (c) Erian, A. W. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 1991.
(5) When the reaction ran with other solvents in the presence of 5 mol
% of InBr3 for 24 h, the quinoline was produced in 28 (PhMe), 2 (Et2O),
45 (1,4-dioxane), and 50% (MeOH) yields.
(1) Sakai, N.; Annaka, K.; Konakahara, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
631.
(2) See details in Supporting Information. Crystal data for 3a: C16H14N2,
MW ) 234.29, orthorhombic, a ) 9.7558(9) Å, b ) 9.0365(9) Å, c )
26.814(3) Å, U ) 2363.8(4) Å3, T ) 273 K, space group Pbca, Z ) 8,
µ(Mo-KR) ) 0.069 mm-1, 12 610 reflections measured, 2763 independent
reflections (Rint ) 0.0300), R1 ) 0.0539, wR2 ) 0.2075.
10.1021/jo060245f CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/30/2006
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3653-3655
3653