A. Houlton et al.
FULL PAPER
turned black, flash silica was added (equal weight to nucleoside) and
measured at a pulse height of 25 mV, a pulse width of 5ꢀ ms and at a scan
À1
solvent was removed. Crude mixture was purified by chromatography (2%
rate of 2ꢀ mVs
.
1
MeOH in DCM). Yield ꢁꢀ%. H NMR (2ꢀꢀ MHz, CDCl
(
ꢁ
, 258C): d 1.9
Electronic structure calculations: Density functional calculations (DFT)
were performed using the Titan program package (Wavefunction Inc.,
USA). Geometries were optimised at the Becke-Perdew level of theory
using the LA-CVP* basis set.
m, 1H; H-2'), 2.ꢁ (m, 1H; H-2'), ꢁ.ꢀ (q, 1H; H-5'), ꢁ.2 (q, 1H; H-5'), ꢁ.8
(
6
1
m, 8H; OMe, H-4'), 4.ꢀ (m, ꢁH; Fc, H-ꢁ'), 4.ꢀ5 (s, 5H; Fc), 4.1 (t, 2H; Fc),
.ꢀ (d, ꢁJ(H,H) 11 Hz, 1H; cis-H), 6.2 (t, 1H; H-1'), 6.ꢁ (d, J(H,H)
ꢁ
1 Hz, 1H; cis-H), 6.8 (d, 4H; DMT), ±.2 (m, 9H; DMT), ±.4 (s, 1H; H-6);
Oligonucleotide synthesis: An Applied Biosystems ꢁ81A DNA synthesizer
was used for the preparation of oligonucleotides. The base-phosphorami-
dites were ULTRAMILD (Glen Research, VA, USA) and the standard
Cap A was replaced with phenoxyacetic anhydride. Standard coupling
protocols (45 s) were used with the exception of the ferrocenyl-phosphor-
amidite for which the coupling time was increased to ꢁ min. On completion
of the synthesis the column was washed thoroughly with acetonitrile and
then dried with argon. Deprotection of the oligonucleotides involved
UV/Vis (CH
EI: ±4ꢀ.22 for C42
'-DMT-5-ethylferrocene-2'-deoxythymidine (3): A solution of 2c-DMT
1 equiv) in distilled anhydrous methanol under nitrogen was cooled to
˱88C. NiCl (1 equiv) was added as a solution in methanol followed by
NaBH
ꢁ
CN): lmax (e) 2±5 (1468±), ꢁ1ꢀ (1±ꢀ25), 451 nm(6±ꢀ); MS:
4ꢀ 2 ±
H N O
Fe.
5
(
2
4
(1.ꢁ equiv). Reaction mixture was stirred at À±88C for one hour
then allowed to warm to ambient temperature. At the point at which the
solution went black, silica was added and solvent was removed. Crude
treatment with either ꢀ.ꢀ5M methanolic K
2 ꢁ
CO for about 5 h or exposure
mixture was separated by column chromatography (1% MeOH in DCM)
to MeNH at a pressure of about 2 bar for 2ꢀ min.
2
1
to give 3 in 25% yield). H NMR (2ꢀꢀ MHz, CDCl
ꢁ
, 258C): d 1.4± (t, 2H;
), ꢁ.45 (m, 2H; H-5', H-5∫),ꢁ.8ꢁ (s,
H; OMe), ꢁ.8± (t, 1H; H-ꢁ'), ꢁ.9ꢁ(m, 4H; Fc), 4.ꢀ9 (s, 5H; Fc), 4.54 (m, 1H;
HPLC were run using Gilson system ±12 controller software. Analytical
runs were performed on a Jones APEX ODS 5m column with an injection
loop of 25 mL. The column was incubated at ꢁꢀ8C. The solvent gradient was
made up of solvent A (1ꢀ% acetonitrile in water containing TEAA buffer
pH6.5) and solvent B (65% acetonitrile in water containing TEAA buffer
pH 6.5), increasing from ꢀ% B to 4ꢀ% B over 25 min and returning to
1ꢀꢀ% A at ꢁꢀ min.
2 2
CH ), 2.24 ± 2.ꢁ8 (m, 4H; H-2', H-2™, CH
6
H-4'), 6.4ꢁ (t, 1H; H-1'), 6.88 (m, 4H; DMT), ±.ꢁꢁ ± ±.48 (m, 1ꢀH; DMT,
H-6); MS: ES : ±42.ꢀ for C42
H
52
N
2
O
±
Fe.
Fe.CHCl
a 9.9869(±), b 2ꢀ.418ꢁ(15), c 12.±998(9) ä, b
Crystal Data: 1a: C21
group P2
H
2ꢀ
N
2
O
5
ꢁ
, M
r
555.6, monoclinic, space
1
,
ꢁ
Àꢁ
1
ꢀ9.±51(2)8, V 2456.5(ꢁ) ä , Z 4, 1calcd 1.5ꢀ2 gcm ; MoKa radiation,
The 2ꢀ-mer oligonucleotide was digested into its monodeoxynucleoside
constituents using snake venom phosphodiesterase and alkaline phospha-
tase following literature procedure.[517
À1
l ꢀ.±1ꢀ±ꢁ ä, m ꢀ.9±6 mm , T 16ꢀ K. Of 1951± reflections, corrected
for absorption, 1ꢀ481 were unique (Rint ꢀ.ꢀꢁ6, q 28.± 8); R ꢀ.ꢀ62 (F
2
2
values, F > 2s), R
w
ꢀ.1±2 (F values, all data), GOF ꢀ.929 for 6ꢁ2
Àꢁ
parameters, final difference map extremes ꢀ.9ꢁ and Àꢀ.69 e ä . T he
structure was solved by direct methods. All non-H atoms were refined
anisotropically. H atoms were refined with a riding model. The asymmetric
unit contains two independent molecules of the complex together with one
ordered and one disordered chloroform molecule.
Acknowledgements
1
b: C21
H
2ꢀ
N
2
O
5
Fe, M
r
4ꢁ6.2, monoclinic, space group P2
1
, a 6.5896(ꢁ),
This work was financially supported in part by the EPSRC.
ꢁ
b 22.1ꢀꢀ4(1ꢀ), c 12.±4ꢀ5(6) ä, b 96.±8ꢀ(2)8, V 1842.46(15) ä , Z
Àꢁ
4
ꢀ
,
1
calcd 1.5±ꢁ g cm
;
synchrotron radiation (SRS station 9.8), l
À1
.6884 ä, m ꢀ.85± mm , T 16ꢀ K. Of 1ꢁꢁ18 reflections, corrected for
[
17 D. Magda, S. Crofts, A. Lin, D. Miles, M. Wright, J. L. Sessler, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 229ꢁ.
absorption and incident beam decay, ±29ꢀ were unique (Rint ꢀ.ꢀꢁ4, q
2
2
2
9.48); R ꢀ.ꢀꢁ2 (F values, F > 2s), R
w
ꢀ.ꢀ±8 (F values, all data),
[27 K. Tanaka, M. Shionoya, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5ꢀꢀ2.
[ꢁ7 J. J. Rack, E. S. Krider, T. J. Meade, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 628±.
[47 F. D. Lewis, S. A. Helvoigt, R. L. Letsinger, Chem. Commun. 1999,
GOF ꢀ.99± for 528 parameters, final difference map extremes ꢀ.ꢁ6
Àꢁ
and Àꢀ.28 e ä . Structure solution and refinement were as for 1a. T he
asymmetric unit contains two independent molecules, but there is no
solvent present.
ꢁ
2±.
[
[
[
57 E. Meggers, D. Kusch, B. Giese, Helv. Chim. Acta. 1997, 80, 64ꢀ.
67 H. Weizman, Y. Tor, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, ꢁꢁ±5.
±7 C. J. Yu, H. Wang, Y. J. Wan, H. Yowanto, J. C. Kim, L. H. Donilon,
C. L. Tao, M. Strong, Y. C. Chong, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 29ꢁ±.
87 G. B. Dreyer, P. B. Dervan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 968.
97 D. S. Sigman, Acc. Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 18ꢀ.
2
9
a: C21
H
22
N
2
O
5
Fe ¥ CHCl
ꢁ
, M
r
55±.6, monoclinic, space group P2
1
, a
ꢁ
.885(2), b 2ꢀ.4±4(4), c 12.949(ꢁ) ä, b 112.156(4)8, V 242±.2(9) ä ,
Àꢁ
À1
Z 4, 1calcd 1.526 g cm ; MoKa radiation, l ꢀ.±1ꢀ±ꢁ ä, m ꢀ.988 mm
,
T 16ꢀ K. Of 92ꢁ8 reflections, corrected for absorption, 58±8 were unique
[
[
2
2
(
R
int ꢀ.ꢀ4ꢁ, q 22.58); R ꢀ.116 (F values, F > 2s), R
w
ꢀ.ꢁ54 (F
values, all data), GOF 1.151 for 6ꢀꢀ parameters, final difference map
[
[
1ꢀ7 P. J. Dandliker, M. E. Nunez, J. K. Barton, Biochemistry 1998, 37, 6491.
117 S. Takenaka, K. Yamashita, M. Takagi, Y. Uto, H. Kondo,Anal. Chem.
Àꢁ
extremes 1.56 and Àꢀ.56 e ä . Structure solution and refinement were
as for 1a, except that H atoms were not located on the sugar groups. The
precision of the structure is limited by the rather weak diffraction data, by
pseudo symmetry, and by twinning. Chloroform sites (two in the
asymmetric unit, together with two independent molecules of the complex)
appear to be only partially occupied. Geometry and displacement
parameter restraints were applied to aid refinement.
2
000, 72, 1ꢁꢁ4.
[
[
[
127 R. C. Mucic, M. K. Herrlein, C. A. Mirkin, R. L. Letsinger, Chem.
Commun. 1996, 555.
1ꢁ7 Y. Mishima, J. Motonaka, K. Maruyama, K. Minagawa, S. Ikeda, Sens.
Act. B. 2000, 65, ꢁ4ꢀ.
147 A. Harriman, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 996; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Programs used: SHELXTL (G. M. Sheldrick, SHEXLTL manual, Bruker
AXS Inc., Madison, WI., USA, 1998, version 5.1), together with standard
Bruker SMARTand SAINTdiffractometer control and data integration
programs and local software.
CCDC-1±5814 (1a), 1±5815 (1b), and 1±5816 (2a) contain the supple-
mentary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained
free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (or from the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2
1
999, 38, 945.
[
[
157 B. Giese, Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 6ꢁ1.
167 B. Giese, S. Wessely, M. Spormann, U. Lindemann, E. Meggers, M. E.
Michel-Beyerle, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 1ꢀ5ꢀ; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
1
999, 38, 996.
[
[
1±7 F. D. Lewis, T. F. Wu, Y. F. Zhang, R. L. Letsinger, S. R. Greenfield,
M. R. Wasielewski, Science 1997, 277, 6±ꢁ.
187 F. D. Lewis, R. L. Letsinger, M. R. Wasielewski, Acc. Chem. Res. 2001,
1
EZ, UK; fax: (44)122ꢁ-ꢁꢁ6-ꢀꢁꢁ; or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
3
4, 159.
Electrochemistry: Electrochemical data were recorded on an EG&G
Princeton Applied Research Potentiostat, Model 26ꢁA (using Echem
software 4.11) and using a silver wire reference electrode, a gold disc
working electrode and a tungsten wire counter electrode. Cyclic voltammo-
[197 C. J. Murphy, M. R. Arkin, Y. Jenkins, N. D. Ghatlia, S. H. Bossmann,
N. J. Turro, J. K. Barton, Science 1993, 262, 1ꢀ25.
[2ꢀ7 R. E. Holmlin, R. T. Tong, J. K. Barton,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
9±24.
[217 M. R. Arkin, E. D. A. Stemp, R. E. Holmlin, J. K. Barton, A.
Hormann, E. J. C. Olson, P. F. Barbara, Science 1996, 273, 4±5.
[227 M. E. Nunez, J. K. Barton, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 199.
À1
grams were recorded at a scan rate of 1ꢀꢀ mVs in ꢀ.1m tetrabutylammo-
nium hexafluorophosphate in acetonitrile and E8 referenced against Fc/Fc
as an external measurement. Differential pulse voltammograms were
2898
¹ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2ꢀꢀ2
ꢀ94±-65ꢁ9/ꢀ2/ꢀ81ꢁ-2898 $ 2ꢀ.ꢀꢀ+.5ꢀ/ꢀ
Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, No. 1ꢁ