Scheme 3
the corresponding aldehydes in 83-93% yields (entries 2-4).
formation of a hemiacetal and its subsequent oxidation to
ester as shown in Scheme 5.14b This is due to the weakly
Similarly, allylic alcohols, geraniol and cinnamyl alcohol,
oxidized to aldehydes without cleavage of the carbon-carbon
double bonds. Furthermore, pyridine-2-methanol and furfurol
were oxidized to the corresponding aldehydes in high yields.
Saturated alcohols, heptyl and decyl alcohol, were moderately
reactive, and the aldehydes were obtained in 38-43% yields.
To study the chemoselectivity, a mixture of primary and
secondary alcohols was next subjected to oxidation in the
presence of 0.5 equiv of K2CO3 (Scheme 3). When cyclo-
hexanol and heptyl alcohol were allowed to react, the former
oxidized to cyclohexanone in 87% yield and the latter gave
heptanal in <5% yield. A similar result was obtained in the
oxidation of cyclododecanol and n-dodecanol, affording
cyclododecanone and dodecanal in 81 and <3% yields,
respectively. These studies clearly reveal that this method
can be applied for the chemoselective oxidation of secondary
alcohols in the presence of primary hydroxy groups.
Scheme 5
acidic nature of the reaction medium (pH ) 6). The addition
of K2CO3 in the oxidation of primary alcohols increases the
pH to 9, inhibiting the hemiacetal formation.
In conclusion, a novel and efficient protocol is presented
for the aerobic oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes and
ketones. Secondary alcohols can be chemoselectively con-
verted into ketones in high yields in the presence of primary
hydroxy groups. It is noteworthy that the aldehydes do not
undergo further oxidation to carboxylic acids.
Regarding the mechanism, a catalytic cycle is proposed
for the oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes and ketones in
Scheme 4.14a The formation of ester from the oxidation of
primary alcohol in the absence of K2CO3 may be due to the
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the
Department of Science and Technology (Sanction No. SR/
S1/OC-092002), New Delhi, and by the Council of Scientific
and Industrial Research (Sanction No. 01(1804)/02/EMR-
II), New Delhi.
Scheme 4
Supporting Information Available: General experimen-
tal procedure and data. This material is available free of
OL036166X
(10) Choudary, B. M.; Kantam, M. L.; Rahman, A.; Reddy, C. V.; Rao,
K. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 763.
(11) Son, Y.-C.; Makwana, V. D.; Howell, A. R.; Suib, S. L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4280.
(12) (a) Maeda, Y.; Kakiuchi, N.; Matsumura, S.; Nishimura, T.; Uemura,
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8877. (b) Maeda, Y.; Kakiuchi, N.;
Matsumura, S.; Nishimura, T.; Kawamura, T.; Uemura, S. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 6718. (c) Kirihara, M.; Ochiai, Y.; Takizawa, S.; Takahata, H.;
Nemoto. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1387.
(13) (a) Das, S.; Punniyamurthy, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6033.
(b) Velusamy, S.; Punniyamurthy, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 3913. (c)
Velusamy, S.; Punniyamurthy, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8955.
(14) (a) Bonchio, M.; Bortolini, O.; Conte, V.; Primon, S. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 763. (b) Tohma, H.; Maegawa, T.; Kita, Y. Synlett
2003, 723.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 2, 2004
219