6942
J. W. Slater, P. J. Steel / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 6941–6943
Acknowledgements
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
NH4OAc
AcOH
We thank the University of Canterbury and the Royal
Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund for generous
funding.
N
O
O
+
microwave
N
H
N
OHC
CHO
10 (43%)
References and notes
O
NH2
N
O
N
1. (a) Steel, P. J. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1990, 106, 227–265; (b)
Downard, A. J.; Phillips, I. G.; Steel, P. J. Aust. J. Chem.
2004, 57, 865–868, and references cited therein; (c) Sumby,
C. J.; Steel, P. J. New J. Chem. 2005, 29, 1077–1081;
(d) Steel, P. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 243–250; (e)
Fitchett, C. M.; Steel, P. J. Aust. J. Chem. 2006, 59, 19–
21.
CHO
+
N
EtOH
piperidine
N
O
N
H2N
O
12 (17%)
Scheme 3. Preparations of ligands 10 and 12.
2. (a) Richardson, C.; Steel, P. J.; D’Alessandro, D. M.;
Junk, P. C.; Keene, F. R. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
2002, 2775–2785; (b) Zampese, J. A.; Keene, F. R.; Steel,
P. J. Dalton Trans. 2004, 4124–4129; (c) Slater, J. W.;
D’Alessandro, D. M.; Keene, F. R.; Steel, P. J. Dalton
Trans. 2006, 1954–1962.
3. (a) Heller, M.; Schubert, U. S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
947–961; (b) Baranoff, E.; Collin, J.-P.; Flamigni, L.;
Sauvage, J.-P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 147–155; (c)
Hofmeier, H.; Schubert, U. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33,
373–399; (d) Constable, E. C.; Housecroft, C. E.; Tao, Y.
Synthesis 2004, 869–874; (e) Andres, P. R.; Schubert, U. S.
Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 1043–1068; (f) Medlycott, E. A.;
Hanan, G. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 133–142; (g)
Constable, E. C.; Dunphy, E. L.; Housecroft, C. E.;
Kylberg, W.; Neuberger, M.; Schaffner, S.; Schofield, E.
R.; Smith, C. B. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 4600–4610; (h)
Chow, H. S.; Constable, E. C.; Housecroft, C. E.;
Neuberger, M.; Schaffner, S. Dalton Trans. 2006, 2881–
2890.
new ligands 8 and 9, respectively.8,9 This microwave
procedure10 avoided the formation of by-products con-
taining a fused imidazolo[1,5-a]pyridine ring system.11
These ligands contain tridentate binding domains
arranged in an ‘angular’ fashion.12 As was previously
1
observed with ligands 3 and 4,2c the H NMR spectra
of these compounds showed significant broadening of
the signals of the pyridine protons due to a slow exchange
on the NMR timescale of the tautomeric imidazole
hydrogens resulting from intramolecular hydrogen
bonding to the pyridine ring.
We next considered the possibility of extending this
ligand design strategy to the preparation of a potentially
tetranucleating ligand. Thus, we reacted terephthalalde-
hyde with 2,20-pyridil, under similar reaction conditions,
which pleasingly furnished the new ligand 10 in 43%
yield (Scheme 3).13 Once again the signals for the
pyridine ring protons were broadened due to slow proto-
tropic tautomerism of the imidazole NH. Double depro-
tonation of this ligand would potentially lead to exciting
new tetranuclear metal complexes, the possibility of
which is under current investigation.
4. (a) Onggo, D.; Craig, D. C.; Rae, A. D.; Goodwin, H. A.
Aust. J. Chem. 1991, 44, 331–341; (b) Heirtzler, F. R.;
Neuburger, M.; Zehnder, M.; Constable, E. C. Liebigs
Ann./Recueil 1997, 297–301.
5. Stroh, C.; Ziessel, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4543–
4546.
6. Norrby, T.; Boerje, A.; Zhang, L.; Akermark, B. Acta
Chem. Scand. 1998, 52, 77–85.
Based upon the interesting results we obtained from the
doubly-bidentate ligand 5, containing the unusual thi-
azolo[5,4-d]thiazole fused heterocyclic ring system,2b we
also sought to extend this ligand design strategy towards
a doubly tridentate analogue. Thus, reaction of 6 with
rubeanic acid led to the new ligand 11 in 61% yield
(Scheme 2).14 This ligand contains two tridentate bind-
ing domains arranged in a ‘stepped-parallel’ manner.12
7. Uenishi, J.; Nishiwaki, K.; Hata, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 35, 7973–7976.
8. Selected data for 8: grey powder, mp 84 °C. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) d: 8.75 (2H, br d, H600); 8.33 (4H, br m,
H30/H300); 7.84 (1H, s, H2); 7.78 (4H, br m, H40/H400); 7.34
(4H, br m, H50/H500). ESMS: calcd C23H17N6 (MH+)
377.1515. Found: 377.1759.
9. Selected data for 9: colourless powder, mp 98 °C. 1H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d: 8.71 (2H, d, J = 5 Hz, H600);
8.31 (4H, br d, J = 8 Hz, H30/H300); 8.10 (2H, d, J = 8 Hz,
Hortho); 7.78 (4H, br s, H40/H400); 7.50 (2H, t, J = 8 Hz,
Hmeta); 7.42 (1H, t, J = 8 Hz, Hpara); 7.32 (4H, br t, H50/
H500). ESMS: calcd C29H21N6 (MH+) 453.1828. Found:
453.2196.
Finally, in order to explore the possibility of tuning the
metal–metal interactions in complexes of ligands such as
5, we considered the option of introducing a benzene
ring between the fused rings. This proved easier to do
with the oxygen, rather than sulfur, analogue and, by
reacting 2,5-diaminobenzoquinone15 with pyridine-2-
carbaldehyde, we obtained the new ‘stepped-parallel’12
ligand 12, albeit in only 17% yield (Scheme 3).16,17
10. Wolkenberh, S. E.; Wisnoski, D. D.; Leister, W. H.;
Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Lindsley, C. W. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
1453–1456.
11. Wang, J.; Mason, R.; VanDerveer, D.; Feng, K.; Bu, X.
R. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5415–5418.
All five new ligands showed spectroscopic and charac-
terisation data in accord with the proposed structures.
Studies are currently underway employing these ligands
as synthons in coordination and metallosupramolecular
chemistry.
12. D’Alessandro, D. M.; Keene, F. R. New J. Chem. 2006,
30, 228–237.
13. Selected data for 10: orange powder, mp 253 °C. 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 11.08 (2H, br s, NH); 8.60 (4H, br d,
H60); 8.37 (4H, br d, H30); 8.07 (4H, s, H2,3,5,6); 7.75 (4H,