920 Cheng et al.
Asian J. Chem.
98
96
94
92
90
88
86
84
82
80
78
76
TABLE-1
EFFECTS OF MOLAR RATIOS OF RAW MATERIALS ON
THE YIELD AMOUNT OF ETHANOL (550 g/mol) AT 80 °C
Entry
Molar ratioa
1:1.2:2.0
1:1.2:2.2
1:1.2:2.5
1:1.2:3.0
1:1.2:3.2
1:1.05:2.5
1:1.1:2.5
1:1.4:2.5
1:1.5:2.5
Yield (%)
75.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
85.5
96.5
93.3
92.1
78.8
85.9
90.3
89.9
a Molar ratio of M1, 2-ethyl acrolein and ammonium acetate
Effects of different temperatures on the yield: Making
the molar ratio of M1:2-ethyl acrolein: ammonium acetate at
1:1.2:2.5. We required to emphasize the reaction temperature
is different. The results are shown in Fig. 1.
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
Amount of ethanol (g/mol)
Fig. 2. Effects of different solvent amount on the yield
acrolein. In addition, we have taken ammonium acetate for
the first time as the source of nitrogen to synthesize diethyl
5-ethyl-2,3-pyridinedicarboxylate. The optimum process is
obtained: ethanol as the solvent, M1:2-ethyl acrolein: ammonium
acetate = 1:1.2:2.5 (molar ratio), keeping reaction temperature
at 80 °C for 5 h. Under this condition, the yield can reach 96.8 %.
Besides the new process can decrease the salinity of the waste-
water and reduce the pressure to environment, which is expected
to apply to the large-scale industrial production.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
REFERENCES
1. A.N. Vasiliev, A.F. Lopez, J.D. Fernandez and A.J. Mocchi, Molecules,
9, 535 (2004).
2. P.J. Wepplo, Pestic. Sci., 29, 293 (1990).
3. A.N. Vasiliev, A.F. Lopez and A.J. Mocchi, Molecules, 5, 338 (2000).
4. M. Los, Ortho-(5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)arylcarboxylates-a new class
of herbicides, In Pesticide synthesis through rational approaches, ACS
Symp. Ser. No 225; American Chemical Society:Washington, D.C, pp.
29-44 (1984).
20
40
60
80
Temperature (°C)
Fig.1. Effects of different reaction temperatures on the yield
5. M. Los, Synthesis and biology of the imidazolinone herbicides, In
Proceedings of the 6th international congress of pesticide
chemistry(Ottawa, Aug. 10-15, 1986), Greenhaugh R, Roberts TR, Eds,
Blachwell scientific pub: Oxford, UK, pp. 35-42 (1987).
6. P.J. Wepplo, Process for the preparation of pyridyl and quinolyl
imidazolinones, US Patent 4474962 (1984).
It can be seen from Fig. 1, the yield increased as the
temperature raise, which can reach highest at 80 °C. It is
possible that the reaction rate is very slow when the temperature
is low. With the increase of temperature, the reaction rate
accelerates. Finally, the reaction temperature 80 °C was chosen
as the optimum temperature.
7. D.R. Maulding and R.F. Doehner, Process for the preparation of 2-(5-
isopropyl-5-methyl-4-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-3-quinoline-carboxylic
acid and alkyl 2-trichloromethyl-3-quinolinecarboxylate intermediates
therefor, US Patent 4459408 (1984).
Effects of solvent amount on the yield: Making the molar
ratio of M1:2-ethyl acrolein:ammonium acetate at 1:1.2:2.5.
We required to emphasize the amount of ethanol is different.
The results are shown in Fig. 2.
8. M. Los, 2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-pyridines and quinolines and use of said
compounds as herbicide agents, US Patent 4798619 (1989).
9. Y.L. Liu and B.G. Ma, Modern Agrochem., 2, 17 (2011).
10. Y.L. Liu and B.G. Ma, Pestic. Sci. Admin., 32, 23 (2011).
11. J. Saukaitis, East Greenwich RI, US Patent 5808067 (1998).
12. V. Elango, M.P. Bodman and D.R. Larkin, EP Patent 0452094A2 (1991).
13. G.A. Chiarello, EP Patent 0548559A1 (1892).
It can be found from Fig. 2, with the increase of the amount
of ethanol, the yield shows a trend that the yield increased at
first and then decreased. Because when the amount of ethanol
is less, ammonium acetate can't be dissolved throughly in
ethanol, which will block the reaction. Then, if there is more
ethanol, it will make the concentration very low, the reaction
rate decreases and side reactions increase. Finally, the optimum
amount of ethanol was 550 g/mol.
14. Y. Takaharu, K. Mitsuhiro and S. Shouzo, EP 0274379A (1988); B.F.
Gupton, US Patent 5208342 (1993).
15. Z.M. Cheng, Shanghai Chem. Ind., 34, 22 (2009).
16. Q.H. Tang and Y.B. Zhang, Shanghai Chem. Ind., 13, 31 (2009).
17. Z.M. Cheng and B.Q. Gu, Agrochemicals, 40, 9 (2001).
18. Y. Zhou, 1, 41 (1997).
19. D.F. Ji,Y.C. Wang, Z.Y. Geng, M.Y. La and W.P. Ma, Sci. Sinica Chim.,
42, 815 (2012).
20. F.C. Zeng, Inorg. Chem. Ind., 9, 1 (2009).
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have successfully developed an easy,
efficient and versatile method for the synthesis of diethyl 5-
ethyl-2,3-pyridinedicarboxylate starting from M1 and 2-ethyl
21. G.Z. Hu, G.C. Xu and L.T. Gao, Technol. Testing, 5, 49 (2002).
22. L.S. Tian, Chem. Eng., 3, 10 (1992).