C. Li et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 25 (2014) 821–824
823
The modifier played an important role with regard to the
activity and enantioselectivity in most heterogeneous catalytic
Table 2
The effect of different solvents on the asymmetric hydrogenation of heteroaromatic
methyl ketones
a
1
6
reactions. Different modifiers (Fig. 4) were evaluated in the
hydrogenation of 2-acetylthiophene. Results are summarized in
Table 1. More than 99% conversion and 78.4% enantioselectivity
were obtained when modifier 1 9-amino(9-deoxy)epicinchonine
was used in the asymmetric hydrogenation of 2-acetylthiophene
Entry
Solvent
Con. (%)
ee (%)
Config.
1
2
3
4
MeOH
EtOH
n-PrOH
i-PrOH
99.0
5.5
3.2
6.0
78.4
55.4
64.7
56.3
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(
Table 1, entry 1). By contrast, the conversion decreased to 63.5%
with an ee value down to 19.4% for the system containing modifier
-amino(9-deoxy)epicinchonidine 2 (Table 1, entry 2). As can be
a
Substrate/Ir = 300/1,2-acetylthiophene: 0.856 mol/L, diamine 1: 2.8Ã10À3 mol/
L, LiOH: 0.05 mol/L, 25 °C, 6 MPa, 2 h.
9
seen, a small change in the structure of the modifiers had a great
influence on the activity, enantioselectivity, and the configuration
of the product. In addition, another two enantiomers (1R,2R)-1,
Table 3
2
-diphenylethylenediamine 3 and (1S,2S)-1,2-diphenylethylenedi-
The effect of different bases on the asymmetric hydrogenation of heteroaromatic
methyl ketones
a
amine 4 were tested and showed the worst activity (Table 1,
entries 3 and 4). When modifier (1S,2S)-dimethyl diaminocyclo-
hexane 5 was used, it exhibited just 7.3% conversion, and medium
Entry
Base
Con. (%)
ee (%)
Config.
1
2
3
4
5
t-BuOK
LiOH
NaOH
KOH
88.3
99.0
98.2
99.4
17.2
77.8
78.4
77.0
76.7
72.8
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
5
8.8% ee in the reaction. These results indicated the high specific
correlation between the catalyst and modifier.
Since the choice of solvent, especially alcohols, had a strong
effect on the enantioselectivity of the asymmetric hydrogenation
in our previous work, four different alcohols were evaluated in this
reaction. As can be seen, the catalytic system showed the best per-
formance in methanol, with up to 78.4% ee and a conversion of
Ca(OH)
2
a
Substrate/Ir = 300/1,2-acetylthiophene: 0.856 mol/L, diamine 1: 2.8Ã10À3 mol/
L, base: 0.05 mol/L, MeOH: 2 mL, 25 °C, 6 MPa, 2 h.
>
99% being achieved (Table 2, entry 1). Just 5.5% and 3.2% conver-
sions were obtained when the asymmetric hydrogenation was car-
ried out in ethanol and n-propanol (Table 2, entries 2 and 3). The
solvent i-propanol was also ineffective in the asymmetric hydroge-
nation, with just 6.0% conversion being obtained (Table 2, entry 4).
Methanol was a unique solvent while the other alcohol solvents
were almost ineffective for the reaction.
enantioselectivities were achieved when the reaction was carried
with LiOH, NaOH, or KOH as the base (Table 3, entries 2–4). A con-
version of 88.3% with 77.8% enantioselectivity was obtained when
t-BuOK was added (Table 3, entry 1). The catalytic system showed
2
the worst performance with Ca(OH) as the base with only 17.2%
conversion being achieved, but with similar enantioselectivity of
72.8% (Table 3, entry 5). Similar to our previous research, the high
concentration of the base and the high concentration of the modi-
fier were necessary in the asymmetric hydrogenation of heteroar-
omatic methyl ketones.
The effect of different bases on the hydrogenation of 2-acetyl-
thiophene was also examined (Table 3). Equivalent activities and
A substrate screening was consequently performed under the
optimized conditions, where differently functionalized and substi-
tuted heteroaromatic methyl ketones were reduced. All of the
hydrogenations were investigated at room temperature and the
results are summarized in Table 4. The sulfur-containing heterocy-
cle did not disturb the catalytic activity, conversely, the catalysis
system showed the best performance when 2-acetylthiophene
was hydrogenated (Table 4, entry 1). A conversion of 99.0% was
obtained in just 2 h and the enantioselectivity of the asymmetric
hydrogenation of 2-acetylthiophene was up to 78.4%. Two furyl
ketones were used to test the catalyst. The highest enantioselectiv-
ity (83.6% ee) was obtained with 80.3% conversion when 2-acetyl-
furan was hydrogenated for 3 h (Table 4, entry 2). No conversion or
enantioselectivity was achieved in the asymmetric hydrogenation
of 5-methyl-2-acetylfuran compared to 2-acetylfuran (Table 4,
entry 3). Previous research showed that no reliable methods for
N
N
H
H
H
H
H2N
NH2
N
N
2
1
NH2
NH2
NH
NH
NH2
NH2
4
5
17
3
the asymmetric hydrogenation of 2-acetylpyrrole were available.
Similar to this research, no reaction took place in the attempted
hydrogenation of 2-acetylpyrrole (Table 4, entry 4). It should be
mentioned that attempts to reduce 1-methyl-2-acetylpyrrole with
the same reaction conditions led to 11.2% conversion and 44.0% ee
(Table 4, entry 5). The ortho-, meta-, and para-acetyl pyridines were
also investigated. The catalytic system did not give excellent activ-
ity or enantioselectivity for the three acetyl pyridine. Low and sim-
ilar conversions (6.4–7.4% in Table 4, entries 6–8) were obtained
after 3 h of reaction. When the reaction time was lengthened to
40 h, 2-acetylpyridine and 3-acetylpyridine were hydrogenated
with almost the same conversion, that is 95.3–95.5% (Table 4,
entries 6 and 7). A conversion of 82.1% was obtained in the hydro-
genation of 4-acetylpyridine in 20 h (Table 4, entry 8). This showed
that 4-acetylpyridine was easier to hydrogenate compared to
Figure 4. Chiral diamines.
Table 1
The effect of different modifiers on the asymmetric hydrogenation of heteroaromatic
methyl ketonesa
Entry
Modifier
Con. (%)
ee (%)
Config.
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
99.0
63.5
<1
<1
7.3
78.4
19.4
—
—
58.8
(S)
(R)
—
—
(R)
a
À3
Substrate/Ir = 300/1,2-acetylthiophene: 0.856 mol/L, diamine: 2.8Ã10 mol/L,
LiOH: 0.05 mol/L, MeOH: 2 mL, 25 °C, 6 MPa, 2 h.