Liu et al.
reactions;16,17 this can be attributed to the difference of
chemical and physical characteristics between vanadium and
niobium. First, vanadium may exhibit various oxidation states
(from +3 to +5) and flexible coordination geometries (square
pyramidal, octahedral, tetrahedral, and trigonal bipyramidal),
whereas niobium usually exists with a valence of +5,
exhibiting in an octahedral coordination geometry.18,19 Sec-
ond, the very low solubility of niobium source from typical
commercial suppliers causes difficulties in the successful
synthesis of niobium-containing materials with high crystal-
linity. It has been shown recently by Jacobson et al.20 that
crystalline niobium phosphates can be synthesized using low-
temperature hydrothermal route, which is typically used for
the synthesis of zeolite microporous materials. Furthermore,
low-temperature hydrothermal reactions allow the use of
organic structure-directing agents and enhance the possibili-
ties for synthesizing new framework topologies. Unfortu-
nately, so far, only one example of zeotype niobium-
containing phosphates, [(Nb0.9V1.1)O2(PO4)2(H2PO4)](N2C2H10),
has been reported using organic amines as templates,20d the
structure of which is closely similar to the vanadium
phosphate analog (VO)2(PO4)2H2PO4‚N2C2H10.21
Recently, we exploit a pathway to the formation of
crystalline niobium phosphates with Nb2O5 as the niobium
source at relatively low temperature by a two-step hydro-
thermal process. As a part of our ongoing research, herein
we describe the syntheses, crystal structures, and thermal
properties of two organically templated niobium and zinco-
niobium fluorophosphates NbOF(PO4)2(C2H10N2)2 (1) and
Zn3(NbOF)(PO4)4(C2H10N2)2 (2) prepared hydrothermally
using ethylenediamine as the template. Compound 1 is the
first example of 1-D niobium phosphates templated by an
organic amine consisting of corner-sharing [Nb2P2] 4-MRs,
and compound 2, containing chain motifs similar to those
found in 1, form a 4-connected 3-D network with a new
zeolite framework topology.
crystals of 1 were recovered as the sole product of the reaction by
filtration; they were washed with water and allowed to dry in air.
The yield was greater than 95% based on Nb. Compound 2 was
synthesized following the same procedure using 0.591 g of
Zn(H2PO4)‚2H2O as the starting material instead of H3PO4. The
product, containing white polycrystalline powder and colorless
prismlike single crystals in a yield of about 70% based on niobium,
was separated by sonication and further washed by distilled water
and then air-dried. IR (KBr, cm-1): ν 3440s, 2917s, 2849s, 2728s,
2190m, 1642m, 1599m, 1553m, 1470w, 1355w, 1247w, 1098s,
1070s, 1021s, 982s, 914s, 880s, 799m, 635w, 587w, 554m, 539m,
489w, 452w for 1; 3444s, 3220s, 2918s, 1621s, 1524s, 1458w,
1415w, 1381w, 1345w, 1328w, 1084s, 1053s, 1009s, 935s, 852s,
644s, 576s, 550s, 471m for 2.
Analytical Procedures. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns
(PXRD) were collected with a PANalytical X’Pert Pro diffrac-
tometer using Cu KR radiation (λ ) 1.5418 Å). Qualitative energy-
dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analyses of single crystals were
performed on a JEOL JSM6700F field-emission scanning electron
microscope equipped with a Oxford INCA system. Elemental
analyses of C, H, and N were performed on an Elemental Vario
EL III analyzer. Infrared spectra were recorded on an ABB Bomen
MB 102 series FT-IR spectrophotometer at room temperature over
the range of 4000-400 cm-1, using a sample powder pelletized
with KBr. The thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were performed
on a Mettler Toledo TGA/SDTA 851e analyzer. The samples were
contained within alumina crucibles and heated at a rate of 10 °C
min-1 from 30 to 900 °C in dry flowing N2 (10 mL/min-1).
Single-Crystal X-ray Studies. Crystals of 1 (dimensions 0.20
× 0.18 × 0.18 mm) and 2 (dimensions 0.40 × 0.28 × 0.20 mm)
were selected for single-crystal analyses at room temperature. The
data was collected using a Bruker Smart CCD diffractometer with
graphite-monochromated Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å) over
the range of 2.27° e θ e 25.68° and 2.52° e θ e 25.73° for
compounds 1 and 2, respectively. Of 3776 and 5180 reflections,
2575 and 970 were independent for compounds 1 and 2, respec-
tively. Absorption corrections were based on symmetry-equivalent
reflections using the SADABS program.22 The structures were
solved by direct methods using the SHELXS program.23 The heavy
atoms (Nb, P, or Zn) were first revealed, and the remaining atoms
(O, C, N) were placed from successive Fourier map analyses. In
compound 1, all the hydrogen atoms of the protonated ethylene-
diamine molecular were geometrically idealized and allowed to ride
on their parent atoms; for compound 2, the hydrogen atoms of the
protonated ethylenediamine molecular were not totally fixed because
it is disordered in two equivalent positions, and the corresponding
carbon (C1) and nitrogen (N2) atoms have been refined with a 50%
site occupancy factor. Oddly, a moderately large C-N (1.622 Å)
distance is observed for the template molecule. This may reflect
the motion of the organic molecule within the cavities of the
structure. The refinements were performed using a full-matrix least-
squares analysis with anisotropic thermal parameters for all non-
hydrogen atoms. Crystallographic and refinement details are
summarized in Table 1. The final R indices for 2 are moderately
high probably because of the statistical disorder of organic amines
and poor crystal quality.
Experimental Section
Reagents. All reagents were of analytical grade and were used
without further purification.
Synthesis. Compounds 1 and 2 were synthesized using a two-
step hydrothermal technology in a 23 mL Teflon-lined autoclave.
In a typical synthesis of compound 1, 0.144 g of Nb2O5 was
dissolved in 0.288 g of 48 wt % HF and heated to 110 °C for 24
h. After it was cooled, this solution was combined with 85% H3PO4
(0.15 mL), ethylenediamine (en, 0.3 mL), H2O (4 mL), and ethylene
glycol (3 mL) and heated at 180 °C for 7 days. Colorless rodlike
(16) Longo, J. M.; Kierkegaard, P. Acta Chem. Scand. 1966, 20, 72.
(17) Liang, S.; Harrison, W. T. A.; Eddy, M. M.; Gier, T. E.; Stucky, G.
Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 917.
(18) Pope, M. T. Heteropoly and Isopoly Oxometalates; Springer: New
Yark, 1983.
(19) Hagrman, P. J.; Finn, R. C.; Zubieta, J. Solid State Sci. 2001, 3, 745.
(20) (a) Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Cheng, H.; Jacobson, A. J. Chem. Commun.
1999, 2531. (b) Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Jacobson, A. J. J. Mater. Chem.
2000, 10, 2774. (c) Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Cheng, H.; Ross, K.; Jacobson,
A. J. J. Mater. Chem. 2000, 10, 1203. (d) Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Jacobson,
A. J. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 1824. (e) Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Jacobson,
A. J. J. Solid State Chem. 2004, 177, 194.
(22) Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS, A Program for the Siemens Area Detector
Absorption Correction; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany.
1997.
(23) (a) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS97, Program for Solution of Crystal
Structure; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997. (b)
Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS97, Program for Solution of Crystal
Refinement; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997.
(21) Harrison, W. T. A.; Hsu, K.; Jacobson, A. J. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7,
2004.
232 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2007