1
72
A.R. Silva, J. Botelho / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 381 (2014) 171–178
catalysts, among other studied first-row transition metal com-
2.2. Synthesis of hexagonal mesoporous silica (HMS)
plexes, in the oxidation of cyclohexane and n-hexane using H O
2
2
at room temperature [7]. As previously reported [8] nitric acid (in
0 mol%) was found to have a promoting effect in the reaction
7].
Heterogeneous catalysts however prevent the obstacles that
commonly occur in homogeneously catalysed systems. Anchoring
a homogeneous catalyst onto solid supports makes the separation
from the reaction media easy, preventing therefore the use of labo-
rious and inefficient extraction processes, thus allowing the reuse
of the catalyst in more catalytic cycles [9–12]. The high selectivity
of transition metal homogeneous catalysts is hence combined with
the heterogeneous catalysts advantages.
The HMS was synthesised according to procedures described
in the literature [9,13]; tetraethoxysilane (37.0 mL, 0.166 mol) was
added to a stirred solution of ethanol (88.1 mL, 1.51 mol), water
(88.5 mL, 4.91 mol) and 1-octylamine (7.4 mL, 0.0448 mol). The
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The obtained
precipitate was vacuum filtered, washed with deionised water
(100 mL) and ethanol (100 mL). In order to remove the template
1
[
◦
(1-octylamine), the precipitate was calcined at 600 C for 24 h.
HMS: elemental analysis (%) C 0.81 H 0.00 N 0.02.
AC: elemental analysis (%) C 88.68 H 0.24 N 0.47.
In terms of industrial application the use of economical
porous supports is also very important. Relatively to conventional
mesoporous silicas prepared by electrostatic assembly pathways,
hexagonal mesoporous silicas (HMS) are prepared by using eco-
nomic alkylamines as templates [13]. Consequently, they present
more extensively cross-linked frameworks, besides of thicker
framework walls, which contribute to superior thermal stability
upon calcination in air. HMS also possesses smaller particles sizes,
alongwith defects in channelpacking, which yields complementary
textural mesoporosity providing better access to the framework-
confined mesopores in liquid phase catalysis [14]. Their surface
silanol groups can be functionalised using derivatizing agents, such
as (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES), allowing the chemical
attachment of the homogeneous catalyst through Schiff condensa-
tion of the free amine group [9,10].
2
.3. Functionalisation of the HMS or AC with APTES
The functionalisation of both porous materials was performed
according to procedures described in the literature [9–12]; a mix-
ture of calcined HMS or dried AC (5.0 g) in dry toluene (50.0 mL) and
(3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (15.0 mmol, 3.5 mL) was refluxed
for 24 h (pH of the APTES in toluene solution was 10). The mate-
rial was vacuum filtered, washed with toluene (3× 50 mL) and
refluxed in toluene for 6 h. The material was dried overnight in an
oven at 100 C. These materials will be referred as APTES@HMS or
APTES@AC.
◦
APTES@HMS: elemental analysis (%) C 7.52 H 1.45 N 1.93, loading
APTES 1.38 mmol g
−1
.
Activated carbons (AC) are porous carbon materials that possess
several advantages over the inorganic porous solids, such as
hydrophobic nature of their surfaces, high specific surface area,
large pore volumes, chemical inertness and good mechanical sta-
bility [15]. Its tunable surface chemistry rich in oxygen functional
groups also allows for wider strategies of homogeneous catalyst
anchoring than the inorganic solids [16].
APTES@AC: elemental analysis (%) C 85.77 H 1.66 N 1.19, load-
−1
ing APTES 0.85 mmol g
and ICP-AES Si 2.27%, loading APTES
−1
0
.81 mmol g
.
2.4. Anchoring of iron(III) acetylacetonate onto
amine-functionalised HMS or AC
In this work, we anchored [Fe(acac)n] (n = 2, 3) complexes onto
solid supports (AC and HMS) functionalised with APTES, through
Schiff condensation between the carbonyl groups of the acetylace-
tonate ligands and the APTES amine. These materials were used as
heterogeneous catalysts for the oxidation of cyclohexane and n-
hexane under mild conditions using hydrogen peroxide as oxidant
and nitric acid as co-oxidant.
The HMS or AC functionalised with APTES (2.0 g) was added
to 100 mL of a solution of [Fe(acac) ] (0.352 g, 996 mol) in
3
dichloromethane, and the mixture was refluxed for 24 h. The
resulting material was extensively washed with dichloromethane
and then refluxed with dichloromethane for 6 h and dried
◦
overnight in an oven at 60 C. These materials will be referred as
[
Fe(acac) ]APTES@HMS or [Fe(acac) ]APTES@AC.
3
3
[
1
Fe(acac) ]APTES@HMS: elemental analysis (%) C 9.49 H 2.04 N
3
2
. Experimental
−
1
.84; ICP-AES Fe 1.2%, loading Fe 215 mol g
.
[
1
Fe(acac) ]APTES@AC: elemental analysis (%) C 85.62 H 1.46 N
3
2
.1. Materials and solvents
−
1
.19, loading APTES 0.85 mmol g ; ICP-AES (%) Fe 0.18 Si 2.11,
−
1
−1
loading Fe 32 mol g and APTES 0.75 mmol g
.
The reagents were used as received; tetraethoxysilane, 1-
octylamine, (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES), dry toluene,
iron(II) acetylacetonate, iron(III) acetylacetonate, cyclohexane,
chlorobenzene, hydrogen peroxide 30 wt% in water, nitric acid
and triphenylphosphine were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich.
Dichloromethane and acetonitrile were HPLC grade and from
Romil company. n-Hexane was from Fisher Scientific. For the
FTIR potassium bromide was used spectroscopic grade and from
Sigma–Aldrich.
2
.5. Anchoring of iron(II) acetylacetonate onto
amine-functionalised HMS or AC
A solution of iron(II) acetylacetonate (0.127 g. 498 mol) in
dichloromethane (100 mL) was refluxed with amine-functionalised
HMS or AC (1.0 g) for 24 h. The solid was vacuum filtered,
washed with dichloromethane (3× 20 mL), and then refluxed
with dichloromethane for 6 h. Finally, the solid was dried
The starting carbon material was a NORIT ROX 0.8 activated
carbon (rodlike pellets with 0.8 mm diameter and 5 mm length).
◦
overnight in an oven at 60 C. These materials will be referred as
[Fe(acac)2]APTES@HMS or [Fe(acac)2]APTES@AC.
3
−1
This material has a pore volume of 0.695 cm g , as determined
by porosimetry (corresponding to meso- and macropores), an ash
content of 2.6% (w/w), an iodine number of 1000 and mercury and
[
Fe(acac) ]APTES@HMS: elemental analysis (%) C 9.74 H 2.60 N
2
−
1
−
3
2.86; ICP-AES Fe 1.38%, loading Fe 247 mol g
[
1
.
helium densities of 0.666 and 2.11 g cm , respectively. The acti-
vated carbon was purified by Soxhlet extraction with 2 M HCl for
Fe(acac) ]APTES@AC: elemental analysis (%) C 82.21 H 0.96 N
2
−
1
.32, loading APTES 0.94 mmol g ; ICP-AES (%) Fe 0.77 Si 2.38,
6
h, washed with deionised water until pH 6–7 and then dried in
−
1
−1
.
◦
loading Fe 138 mol g and APTES 0.85 mmol g
an oven at 150 C for 13 h under vacuum.