308
Can. J. Chem. Vol. 91, 2013
surface properties), CNTs also possess a unique hollow structure,
unique electronic, mechanical, and adsorption properties, as well
as excellent thermal stability. Therefore, CNTs are very promising
candidates for catalyst supports. Because of their small sizes, CNT-
supported catalysts can be uniformly dispersed into the solvents
under stirring.13 Moreover, the catalysts can be recovered via gravity
settling or filtration.13,14 Most importantly, for liquid phase reactions
the high external surface area and the lack of microporous structure
of CNTs could remarkably reduce the mass transfer phenomena dur-
ing the reactions, which greatly improve catalytic efficacy. The use of
CNTs as catalyst supports in many reactions has been reported, and
higher activity and (or) selectivity were observed on CNT-supported
catalysts compared with catalysts supported on conventional
carriers.13–15 However, the application of CNTs in catalytic
hydrodehalogenation of aryl halides is less well-known.
In a previous publication, we reported for the first time that com-
pared with conventional supports, CNT-supported Pd catalysts offer
not only better performance in the hydrodehalogenation of
Pd required.16 Inspired by this study, Kim et al. reported the syn-
thesis of Pd/CNT nanocomposites and investigated their catalytic
behavior in the hydrodehalogenation of aryl halides.17 In this
work, we first studied the effects of surface functionalization of
CNTs and reaction conditions on the performance of Pd/CNT cat-
alysts in the liquid phase hydrodehalogenation of bromobenzene.
Subsequently, we extended the substrate to various aryl halides
over Pd/CNT catalysts under optimal reaction conditions.
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were employed to quali-
tatively determine the number of oxygen-containing functional
groups on the surface of the CNTs, using a CHI 660 C electrochem-
ical workstation (CHI Instrument Corp., Shanghai). The glassy car-
bon electrode where 5 L of the suspension (1 g/L) of CNTs in DMF
was dropped and subsequently dried by IR lamp was used as the
working electrode; platinum wire and saturated calomel elec-
trodes were used as counter and reference electrodes, respec-
tively. The electrolyte was 1 mol/L H2SO4 solution.
Catalytic performance test
Hydrodehalogenation of the aryl halides was carried out in a
glass flask equipped with a reflux condenser under atmospheric
pressure. Typically, at a certain temperature, 50 mg of catalyst,
hydrazine hydrate (85%), solvent, and reaction substrate were
mixed and stirred for different times. The products were quanti-
tatively analyzed by gas chromatography (GC7890II, Shanghai
Tian Mei Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd.) and toluene was used as
internal standard. The products were further confirmed by
GC–MS (Agilent 6890N/5973N).
Results and Discussions
f-CNTs-1, and f-CNTs-2. Negligible difference in C1s spectra is de-
that the structure of CNTs was not seriously destroyed during acid
ence (Fig. 1b). The 531.6 eV and 533.0 eV peaks in the spectra can be
assigned to the O element in –C=O and –C–O functional groups,
respectively19,20 The 534.6 eV peak can be attributed to the O
element in –COO– functional groups.19 It is noted that the surface-
adsorbed H2O in the samples may also contribute to this peak,
since the binding energies for H2O and –COO– are found to over-
lap.20 The number of the surface oxygen-containing functional
groups on CNTs can be qualitatively determined by the relative
intensity of the O1s spectra. The relatively weak peaks for r-CNTs
demonstrate that there were a small amount of oxygen-containing
functional groups on their surfaces, which are likely to be produced
during the chemical vapor deposition process for CNTs prepara-
tion.21 In contrast, the relatively stronger peaks for f-CNTs-1 and
f-CNTs-2 suggest that a large number of –C=O, –OH, and –COO– func-
tional groups were introduced on their surfaces during the acid treat-
ment. Moreover, the number of oxygen-containing functional
groups depends on the acid treatment conditions, with a harsher
condition resulting in a larger number of surface functional groups.
various CNT samples. Consistent with Fig. 1b, the O content in the
samples follows the order f-CNTs-2 > f-CNTs-1 > r-CNTs.
To further confirm the surface functional groups and their den-
acterizations. Figure 2 shows the CV curves of the r-CNTs, f-CNTs-1,
and f-CNTs-2 modified electrodes in 1 mol/L H2SO4. For the modi-
fied CNTs (f-CNTs-1 and f-CNTs-2), the ϳ0.55 V anodic peak and the
ϳ0.49 V cathodic peak in CV curves are related to the redox phe-
nomena of oxygen-containing functional groups. Almost no redox
peaks were observed for r-CNTs, demonstrating that there were
few functional groups on their surfaces. The intensity of the redox
peaks of f-CNTs-2 was greater than that of f-CNTs-1, suggesting
that more oxygen-containing functional groups were introduced
on the former than on the latter. The electrochemical characteriza-
tion results are in good agreement with the XPS measurements.
The properties and content of the surface functional groups on
spectra of r-CNTs, f-CNTs-1, and f-CNTs-2. The peak at 1562 cm−1 is
the characteristic band of aromatic ring.22 Since CNTs is com-
posed of rings of 5 carbon atoms and 6 carbon atoms, similar to
Experimental
Modification of CNTs supports
High quality multi-walled CNTs were synthesized according to a
method described previously.18 Raw CNTs (r-CNTs) were treated by
a mixture of concentrated H2SO4 and HNO3 in ultrasonication
conditions. Briefly, 1.0 g of r-CNTs was added to a 100 mL round-
bottomed flask containing 1:1 (v/v) of the concentrated H2SO4 and
HNO3 mixture. The flask was placed in an ultrasonic bath for ϳ4 h
at room temperature (RT). The modified CNTs were then filtered,
washed with water to neutral, dried at 100 °C overnight, and de-
noted as f-CNTs–1. The r-CNTs were also treated in a harsher con-
dition (3:1 v/v) of the concentrated H2SO4 and HNO3 mixture, and
at an ultrasonic bath temperature of 60 °C). The products obtained
were designated as f-CNTs-2.
Catalyst preparation
Pd/CNTs catalysts were prepared via impregnation with a nom-
inal Pd loading of 2 wt%. Specifically, the CNTs (r-CNTs, f-CNTs-1, or
f-CNTs-2) were first impregnated into a PdCl2 aqueous solution for
30 min. The mixture was then treated in ultrasonic bath at RT
for ϳ4 h, dried at 100 °C for 12 h, and calcined at 300 °C for 3 h.
Finally, the samples were reduced at 250 °C under hydrogen at-
mosphere for 2 h and cooled to RT under the protection of Ar flow.
Catalyst characterization
The surface composition and properties of samples were ana-
lyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, VG ESCALAB
210 type). The base pressure of the main vacuum chamber was
4.5 × 10−11 mbar (1 bar = 100 kPa) and the X-ray source was Mg
K␣ (h = 1253.6 eV). The charge correction was based on C1s bind-
ing energy (BE, 284.4 eV). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of
the catalysts were performed using a PANalytical X'Pert PRO X,
with K␣ radiation ( = 1.542 Å), generated at 50 kV, 60 mA. A
Thermo Nicolet 870 FTIR Fourier transform IR instrument was
used for IR analysis. Samples were ground into powder and
tableted with potassium bromide before test. The transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of the catalysts was carried
out on a JEOL 2010 instrument at an accelerating voltage of
200 kV. The samples were ultrasonically dispersed into an ethanol
solution, dropped on the surface of a Cu grid, and dried at RT.
Published by NRC Research Press