Chemistry Letters 2002
747
Table 4. Catalytic and stereoselective ‘‘armed-disarmed’’ glycosyla-
tion
controlled by the nature of solvent under kinetic condition.
Next, catalytic and chemoselective glycosylation between the
‘‘armed’’ glycosyl donor 1 and the ‘‘disarmed’’ glycosyl acceptor 48
was examined in the presence of various additives (Table 3). As a
result, the ‘‘armed-disarmed’’ chemoselective glycosylation pro-
ceeded smoothly and afforded the desired disaccharide 5 in high
yield in the coexistence of 5–10 mol% of TfOH and MS 4A in
CH2Cl2 at ꢁ78 ꢂC without giving any damage to a reducing end of
an acceptor (entries 7,8). The reason why the yields of the desired
disaccharide 5 shown in entries 2and 4 were low is ascribed to the
hydrolysis that took place in usual work-upprocedure of the initially
formed 5 whose reactive leaving group still remained in.
Table 3. Catalytic ‘‘armed-disarmed’’ glycosylation
phenyl formimidates was effectively performed in the presence of
t
a catalytic amount of TfOH and MS 4A at ꢁ78 ꢂC in BuOMe or
EtCN, respectively. It is expected that these glycosylations using
‘‘armed’’ and ‘‘disarmed’’ glycosyl p-trifluoromethylbenzylthio-p-
trifluoromethylphenyl formimidates in appropriate solvents would
be applicable to the efficient one-pot glycosylation.
The present research is partially supported by Grant-in-Aids for
Scientific Research from Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture.
References and Notes
1
Reviews: K. Toshima and K. Tatsuta, Chem. Rev., 93, 1503 (1993);
K. Suzuki and T. Nagasawa, J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn., 50, 378
(1992).
Finally, the above glycosylation was tried in EtCN at ꢁ78 ꢂC
and the glycoside was formed in good yield with high 1,2-trans
stereoselectivity, as expected (Table 4, entry 3). It is surprising to
note that the glycoside was also formed in good yield with
2B. Fraser-Reid, Acc. Chem. Res., 29, 57 (1996).
3
4
5
6
D. R. Mootoo, P. Konradsson, U. Udodong, and B. Fraser-Reid, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 5583 (1988); B. Fraser-Reid, Z. Wu, U. E.
Udodong, and H. Ottosson, J. Org. Chem., 55, 6068 (1990).
R. W. Friesen and S. J. Danishefsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111, 6656
(1989); K. Suzuki, G. A. Sulikowski, R. W. Friesen, and S. J.
Danishefsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 8895 (1990).
t
extremely high 1,2-cis stereoselectivity at ꢁ78 ꢂC when BuOMe
was used as solvent (entry 6). It is explained by considering the
bulkiness of acceptor 4 which is making it more difficult to approach
oxocarbonium ion of the donor from ꢁ-side than acceptor 2.
The typical experimental procedure is as follows: to a stirred
suspension of MS 4A (88 mg), 1 (29.1 mg, 0.032 mmol) and 4
G. H. Veeneman and J. H. van Boom, Tetrahedron Lett., 31, 2 75
(1990); G. H. Veeneman, S. H. van Leeuwen, and J. H. van Boom,
Tetrahedron Lett., 31, 1331 (1990).
t
(25.0 mg, 0.029 mmol) in BuOMe (2.0 mL) was added a toluene
a
´
M . I. Barrena, R. Echarri, and S. Castillon, Synlett, 1996, 675; L.
solution (ca. 0.1 mL) of TfOH (0.48 mg, 3.2 ꢂmmol) at ꢁ78 ꢂC.
The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at the same temperature and
was quenched by adding saturated aqueous NaHCO3. The mixture
was filtered through the pad of celite, and aqueous layer was
extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was washed
with brine, and dried over Na2SO4. After filtration and evaporation,
the resulted residue was purified by preparative TLC (hexane/
EtOAc 4 : 1) to give the desired product 5 (37.4 mg, 93%,
ꢀ=ꢁ ¼ 95 : 5).
Green, B. Hinzen, S. J. Ince, P. Langer, S. V. Ley, and S. L.
Warriner, Synlett, 1998, 440; D. K. Baeschlin, L. G. Green, M. G.
Hahn, B. Hinzen, S. J. Ince, and S. V. Ley, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 11, 173 (2000); T. Mukaiyama, K. Takeuchi, H. Jona,
H. Maeshima, and T. Saitoh, Helv. Chim. Acta, 83, 1901 (2000); H.
Jona, H. Mandai, W. Chavasiri, K. Takeuchi, and T. Mukaiyama,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 75, 291 (2002).
T. Mukaiyama, H. Chiba, and S. Funasaka, Chem. Lett., 2002, 392.
‘‘Disarmed’’ glycosyl acceptor 4 was synthesized by 4 steps
procedure from ethyl 2,3,4-tri-O-benzoyl-1-thio-ꢁ-D-glucopyrano-
side as follows; 1) TBDPSCl, imidazole/DMF, 2) 70% TfOH aq., n-
Bu4NIO4/MeCN, 0 ꢂC, 3) KHMDS, p-CF3PhNCS/THF, ꢁ78 ꢂC,
then p-CF3BnBr, 0 ꢂC, 4) TBAF, AcOH/THF.
7
8
Thus, catalytic, highly 1,2-cis or 1,2-trans stereoselective and
chemoselective glycosylation between novel ‘‘armed’’ and ‘‘dis-
armed’’ glycosyl p-trifluoromethylbenzylthio-p-trifluoromethyl-