Page 7 of 9
CP al et aa lsy es i ds oS c ni eo nt c ae d &j uTs et c mh na or gl oi ng sy
Journal Name
ARTICLE
4
mM PLP, 1 mM DTNB, 1% EtOH, and 5 μL of cell lysate from the TA
library. The coupled assay was implemented using 20 mM L-Ala, 10
mM HPT, 2 mM acceptor, 0.05 mM PLP, 1 mM DTNB, 1 % EtOH, 20
mU/well A9CV07 (6,7 μg), and 5 μL of cell lysate from the TA library.
Lysates from 32 independent cultures of E.coli cells bearing an
empty plasmid were used in the same conditions as negative
control for all type of assays. These control experiments allowed to
A. Nobili, L. Skalden, T. van den Bergh, H.-J. Joosten, P.
DOI: 10.1039/D0CY02070B
Berglund, et al., Biotechnology Advances, 2015, 33, 566.
N. V. Grishin, M. A. Phillips and E. J. Goldsmith, Protein
Science, 1995, 4, 1291.
M. Höhne, S. Schätzle, H. Jochens, K. Robins and U. T.
Bornscheuer, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2010, 6, 807.
P. Tufvesson, J. Lima-Ramos, J. S. Jensen, N. Al-Haque, W.
Neto and J. M. Woodley, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2011, 108,
5
6
7
calculate means (μ
C
), standard deviations (σ
C
) and hit threshold (HT
) for each set of
1
479.
=
μ
C
+ 3*σ or HT = 1,75*μ
C
9
C
if σ < 0.25*μ
C
C
8
9
R. J. Meier, M. T. Gundersen, J. M. Woodley and M.
Schürmann, ChemCatChem, 2015, 7, 2594.
2
substrates. Another control experiment was performed for both
direct and coupled assays and for each enzyme of the library in the
C. K. Savile, J. M. Janey, E. C. Mundorff, J. C. Moore, S. Tam,
W. R. Jarvis, J. C. Colbeck, A. Krebber, F. J. Fleitz, J. Brands, et
al., Science, 2010, 329, 305.
same conditions but without any acceptor substrate (A
were stirred 90 s before absorbance variations were recorded at
12 nm over 30 min. TA activities were calculated using ε = 14150
0
). Plates
1
0 E.-S. Park, J.-Y. Dong and J.-S. Shin, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013,
4
1
1, 6929.
-1
-1
M .cm for the thiolate anion formed from DTNB. TA with activities 11 G. Matcham, M. Bhatia, W. Lang, C. Lewis, R. Nelson, A.
Wang and W. Wu, CHIMIA, 1999, 53, 584.
0
above both HT and 4*A were considered as hits.
1
1
2 F. G. Mutti, C. S. Fuchs, D. Pressnitz, J. H. Sattler and W.
Kroutil, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2011, 353, 3227.
3 M. D. Truppo and N. J. Turner, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8,
Conclusions
1
280.
We have developed two new continuous colorimetric assays 14 S. Schätzle, F. Steffen-Munsberg, A. Thontowi, M. Höhne, K.
suitable for screening amine-TA collections. Both assays,
implemented on crude cell lysates, displayed high sensitivity and
broad dynamic range. The direct assay allowed the identification of
a series of highly active HPT-TA, among which an enzyme with a
narrow substrate spectrum proved suitable for use as the auxiliary
Robins and U. T. Bornscheuer, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2011, 353,
439.
5 H.-H. Lo, S.-K. Hsu, W.-D. Lin, N.-L. Chan and W.-H. Hsu,
Biotechnol. Progress, 2005, 21, 411.
6 T. Li, A. B. Kootstra and I. G. Fotheringham, Org. Process Res.
Dev., 2002, 6, 533.
2
1
1
enzyme in the coupled assay. The latter was proven useful for the 17 A. P. Green, N. J. Turner and E. O’Reilly, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2014, 53, 10714.
reliable TA activity measurement with L-Ala as standard amine
1
1
8 L. Martínez‐Montero, V. Gotor, V. Gotor‐Fernández and I.
Lavandera, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2016, 358, 1618.
9 A. Gomm, W. Lewis, A. P. Green and E. O’Reilly, Chem. Eur. J.,
2016, 22, 12692.
donor and various carbonyl acceptors. Moreover, the coupled assay
can obviously be implemented in a stereoselective fashion by using
L- or D-Ala as amine donor in order to distinguish (S)- or (R)-amine-
TA. Finally the transamination reaction in both assays is the 20 I. Slabu, J. L. Galman, N. J. Weise, R. C. Lloyd and N. J. Turner,
ChemCatChem, 2016, 8, 1038.
conversion of interest in asymmetric synthesis, i.e. the
2
2
2
1 R. C. Simon, F. Zepeck and W. Kroutil, Chem. Eur. J., 2013, 19,
enantioselective formation of a chiral amine from a prochiral
ketone, thus giving a reliable prediction of the TA applicability in
biocatalytic processes.
2
859.
2 E. Heuson, F. Charmantray, J.-L. Petit, V. de Berardinis and T.
Gefflaut, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2019, 361, 778.
3 N. W. Fadnavis, S.-H. Seo, J.-H. Seo and B.-G. Kim,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2006, 17, 2199.
4 J. D. Rozzell, US4518692 (A), May 21, 1985.
5 T. Gefflaut, Z. Assaf and M. Sancelme, Methods Mol. Biol.,
(Clifton, N.J.) 2012, 794, 55.
6 T. H. V. Huynh, M. N. Erichsen, A. S. Tora, C. Goudet, E.
Sagot, Z. Assaf, C. Thomsen, R. Brodbeck, T. B. Stensbøl, W.
E. Bjørn-Yoshimoto, et al., J. Med. Chem., 2016, 59, 914.
7 R. E. Humphrey, M. H. Ward and W. Hinze, Anal. Chem.,
1970, 42, 698.
2
2
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
2
Acknowledgements
We thank the French National Center for Scientific Research
2
2
2
8 G. L. Ellman, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1959, 82, 70.
9 E. Heuson, J.-L. Petit, A. Debard, A. Job, F. Charmantray, V.
de Berardinis and T. Gefflaut, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,
(CNRS) and University of Clermont-Auvergne for financial
support. We also thank Ms Martine Sancelme for enzyme
production and Ms Virginie Pellouin for technical assistance.
2
016, 100, 397.
3
0 S. Schätzle, M. Höhne, E. Redestad, K. Robins and U. T.
Bornscheuer, Anal. Chem., 2009, 81, 8244.
Notes and references
31 T. Scheidt, H. Land, M. Anderson, Y. Chen, P. Berglund, D. Yi
and W.-D. Fessner, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2015, 357, 1721.
3
3
3
3
2 D. Baud, N. Ladkau, T. S. Moody, J. M. Ward and H. C. Hailes,
Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 17225.
3 M. D. Truppo, J. D. Rozzell, J. C. Moore and N. J. Turner, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 395.
4 J. Hopwood, M. D. Truppo, N. J. Turner and R. C. Lloyd,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 773.
5 L. Pollegioni, P. Motta and G. Molla, Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol., 2013, 97, 9323.
1
2
3
E. E. Ferrandi and D. Monti, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,
017, 34, 13.
A. Gomm and E. O’Reilly, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2018, 43,
06.
M. D. Patil, G. Grogan, A. Bommarius and H. Yun, Catalysts,
018, 8, 254.
2
1
2
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 7
Please do not adjust margins