Communication
ChemComm
ERAAP activity in cells and in a plate reader format. We
anticipate numerous applications for Ep given the great interest
in understanding the biology of ERAAP and in developing new
ERAAP inhibitors.
Support from NIH grants R37060040 and RO1AI130210 is
acknowledged.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
1 T. Serwold, F. Gonzalez, J. Kim, R. Jacob and N. Shastri, Nature,
2002, 419, 480–483.
2 T. Saric, S.-C. Chang, A. Hattori, I. A. York, S. Markant, K. L. Rock,
M. Tsujimoto and A. L. Goldberg, Nat. Immunol., 2002, 3, 1169.
3 I. A. York, S.-C. Chang, T. Saric, J. A. Keys, J. M. Favreau,
A. L. Goldberg and K. L. Rock, Nat. Immunol., 2002, 3, 1177.
4 A. Strange, F. Capon, C. C. A. Spencer, J. Knight, M. E. Weale,
M. H. Allen, A. Barton, G. Band, C. Bellenguez and J. G. M. Bergboer,
et al., Nat. Genet., 2010, 42, 985–990.
5 E. Reeves, A. Colebatch-Bourn, T. Elliott, C. J. Edwards and E. James,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2014, 111, 17594–17599.
6 Y. Kirino, G. Bertsias, Y. Ishigatsubo, N. Mizuki, I. Tugal-Tutkun,
E. Seyahi, Y. Ozyazgan, F. S. Sacli, B. Erer and H. Inoko, et al., Nat.
Genet., 2013, 45, 202.
7 G. E. Hammer, F. Gonzalez, M. Champsaur, D. Cado and N. Shastri,
Nat. Immunol., 2005, 7, 103.
Fig. 6 Ep based high throughput screen identifies electrophiles that can
inhibit ERAAP activity. (a) Scatter plot describing the results of the 1460-
compound screen for inhibition of ERAAP activity. (b) Validation of the top
8 hits for ERAAP inhibition. Compounds A, B and C showed significantly
higher inhibition efficiency (Z62%) than the other 5 hit compounds.
(c) Dose-dependent inhibition curves of compounds A, B and C. Compound
A had an IC50 of 23 mM, which was the lowest among all three compounds. (d)
Structure of compound A, a promising pharmacophore for developing
irreversible ERAAP inhibitors.
´
8 J. Yan, V. V. Parekh, Y. Mendez-Fernandez, D. Olivares-Villagomez,
S. Dragovic, T. Hill, D. C. Roopenian, S. Joyce and L. Van Kaer, J. Exp.
Med., 2006, 203, 647–659.
9 N. A. Nagarajan, F. Gonzalez and N. Shastri, Nat. Immunol., 2012, 13,
579–586.
10 L. Cifaldi, E. Lo Monaco, M. Forloni, E. Giorda, S. Lorenzi, S. Petrini,
E. Tremante, D. Pende, F. Locatelli and P. Giacomini, et al., Cancer
Res., 2011, 71, 1597.
11 E. James, I. Bailey, G. Sugiyarto and T. Elliott, J. Immunol., 2013,
190, 5839.
12 S. Xu, H.-W. Liu, X.-X. Hu, S.-Y. Huan, J. Zhang, Y.-C. Liu, L. Yuan,
F.-L. Qu, X.-B. Zhang and W. Tan, Anal. Chem., 2017, 89, 7641–7648.
13 I. A. York, M. A. Brehm, S. Zendzian, C. F. Towne and K. L. Rock,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103, 9202.
(see Fig. S5 in the ESI†). Ep was used to screen a 1460- compound
electrophile library (Enamine Ltd). We chose an electrophile
library for screening because these fragments can serve as leads
for the development of irreversible inhibitors.
The results of our HTS are shown in Fig. 6 as an activity
scatter-plot (Fig. 6a). We identified 8 compounds that could
reproducibly inhibit ERAAP activity. Three compounds (A–C)
were chosen for further study because of their low IC50 values in
comparison to the other members of the library (Fig. 6b). Of
these, compound A, (1-(4-bromo-2-fluorophenyl)prop)-2-yn-1-
one, exhibited the lowest IC50 (23 mM), whereas compounds B
and C had IC50 values of 92 mM and 175 mM, respectively
(Fig. 6c). Although this value is still high compared with several
other reported ERAP1 inhibitors, which have sub-micromolar
range IC50s,23,24 we anticipate that the efficiency of A–C can
considerably be improved after further optimization. Steady-
state time dependent inhibition studies with A demonstrated
that it could generate almost 100% of inhibition of ERAAP after
a 4.5 h pre-incubation (see Fig. S6 in the ESI†), suggesting that
it is an irreversible inhibitor. Compound A is a halogen sub-
stituted phenyl ketone alkyne (Fig. 6d), and its small size and
low electrophilicity suggest that it is a suitable pharmacophore
for developing irreversible ERAAP inhibitors.
14 T. Serwold, S. Gaw and N. Shastri, Nat. Immunol., 2001, 2, 644.
15 N. Brouwenstijn, T. Serwold and N. Shastri, Immunity, 2001, 15,
95–104.
16 S. A. Farber, M. Pack, S. Y. Ho, L. D. Johnson, D. S. Wagner,
R. Dosch, M. C. Mullins, H. S. Hendrickson, E. K. Hendrickson
and M. E. Halpern, Science, 2001, 292, 1385–1388.
17 H. S. Hendrickson, E. K. Hendrickson, I. D. Johnson and
S. A. Farber, Anal. Biochem., 1999, 276, 27–35.
18 G. T. Wijewickrama, J. H. Kim, Y. J. Kim, A. Abraham, Y. S. Oh,
B. Ananthanarayanan, M. Kwatia, S. J. Ackerman and W. Cho, J. Biol.
Chem., 2006, 281, 10935–10944.
19 S.-C. Chang, F. Momburg, N. Bhutani and A. L. Goldberg, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2005, 102, 17107–17112.
20 A. Gandhi, D. Lakshminarasimhan, Y. Sun and H.-C. Guo, Sci. Rep.,
2011, 1, 186.
21 G. Kochan, T. Krojer, D. Harvey, R. Fischer, L. Chen, M. Vollmar,
F. von Delft, K. L. Kavanagh, M. A. Brown and P. Bowness, et al.,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2011, 108, 7745–7750.
22 T. T. Nguyen, S.-C. Chang, I. Evnouchidou, I. A. York, C. Zikos,
K. L. Rock, A. L. Goldberg, E. Stratikos and L. J. Stern, Nat. Struct.
Mol. Biol., 2011, 18, 604–613.
23 E. Zervoudi, E. Saridakis, J. R. Birtley, S. S. Seregin, E. Reeves,
P. Kokkala, Y. A. Aldhamen, A. Amalfitano, I. M. Mavridis and
E. James, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2013, 110, 19890.
24 P. Kokkala, A. Mpakali, F.-X. Mauvais, A. Papakyriakou, I. Daskalaki,
I. Petropoulou, S. Kavvalou, M. Papathanasopoulou, S. Agrotis and
T.-M. Fonsou, et al., J. Med. Chem., 2016, 59, 9107–9123.
In conclusion, in this report we present a new peptide based
fluorescent probe for ERAAP, termed Ep, which can image
Chem. Commun.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018