Raney Ni–Si Catalyst for Selective Hydrogenation of BYD
Because the Si atoms doped into the lattice of Raney Ni
reduced the activity for hydrogenation of BYD to some
extent. However, the selectivity to BED over Raney Ni
catalyst decreased from 90.0 to 42.1 % with increasing
References
1
2
. Winterbottom JM, Marwan H, Viladevall J, Sharma S, Rayma-
shasay S (1997) Stud Surf Sci Catal 108:59
. Chaudhari RV, Jagernathan R, Kolhe DS, Erning G, Hofman H
(1987) Appl Catal A 29:141
-
1
contact time from 2.9 to 17.4 gcat. h mol . But the
selectivity to BED over Raney Ni–Si catalysts were always
higher than 70 % with increasing contact time, which much
high than that of Raney Ni catalyst. The formation of
nickel silicides on the surface of Raney Ni suppressed the
further hydrogenation of BED.
3. Chaudhari RV, Rode CV, Jaganathan R, Telkar MM, Rane VHEP
2002) Patent EP1207146
. Telkar MM, Rode CV, Rane VH, Jaganathan R, Chaudhari RV
2001) Appl Catal A 216:13
(
4
5
(
. Weissermel K, Arpe HJ (1994) Industrielle Organische Chemie.
VCH Verlagsge-sellschaft, Weinheim
6
7
8
. Harris N, Tuck MW (1990) Hydrocarb Process 69:79
. Zhao FY, Ikushima Y, Arai M (2003) Green Chem 5:656
. Appleyard CJS, Gartshore JFC (1946) BIOS Rep 367:22
Figure 8 presented that product selectivity of the
hydrogenation of BYD versus the contact time at 3 MPa H2
and 90 °C over the Raney 350-NiSi catalyst. At the low
x
9. Bruehwiler A, Semagina N, Grasemann M, Renken A, Kiwi-
Minsker L, Saaler A, Lehmann H, Bonrath W, Roessler F (2008)
Ind Eng Chem Res 47:6862
10. Chaudhari RV, Parande MG, Ramchandran PA, Brahme PH,
Vadgaonkar HG, Jaganathan R (1985) AIChE J 31:1891
1. Bollger G, Boer R, Wache W, Gratze H, Koerning W (1976)
German Patent 2451929
2. Wood J, Bodenes L, Bennett J, Deplanche K, Macaskie LE
contact time (i.e., lower conversions), the BYD hydroge-
nation produced primarily BED. The selectivity to BED is
-
1
ca. 85 % (contact time 2.9 gcat. h mol ). Once the BYD is
completely depleted with increasing the contact time, the
dominant species (BED) is hydrogenated to BDO or
isomerized into 4-hydroxybutanal. Furthermore, the cycli-
zation of 4-hydroxybutanal easily took place to produce
hemiacetal (2-OH-THF). The reaction network of BYD
hydrogenation over Raney Ni–Si is shown in Scheme 1.
Comparing among the Raney Ni–Si catalysts, it is further
demonstrated that the nickel silicides modified Raney Ni
improved the selectivity hydrogenation property of BYD
due to the stronger interaction between Ni and Si atoms.
1
1
1
(
2010) Ind Eng Chem Res 49:980
3. Bautista FM, Campelo JM, Garcia A, Guarde n˜ o R, Luna D,
Marinas JM (1991) Stud Surf Sci Catal 59:269
14. Tanielyan S, Schmidt S, Marin N, Alvez G, Augustine R (2010)
Top Catal 53:1145
5. Rode CV, Tayade PR, Nadgeri JM, Jaganathan R, Chaudhari RV
2006) Org Process Res Dev 10:278
6. Thomas H, Maugh II (1984) Science 225:403
17. Schmitt AL, Higgins JM, Szczech JR, Jin S (2010) J Mater Chem
0:223
1
(
1
2
1
1
2
8. Zhao AQ, Zhang XF, Chen X, Guan JC, Liang CH (2010) J Phys
Chem C 114:3962
9. Chen X, Zhao AQ, Shao ZF, Li C, Williams CT, Liang CH
4
Conclusions
(
2010) J Phys Chem C 114:16525
Raney Ni–Si catalysts have been synthesized by exposing
Raney Ni to volatile silane, in which the Si atoms doped
into the lattice of Raney Ni uniformly. However, Al and Si
relative to Ni with lower sublimation energy were found to
be concentrated at the surface on Raney Ni–Si and form a
passive aluminum oxide and silica film. In the selective
hydrogenation of highly concentrated BYD in a fixed bed
reactor, Raney Ni–Si had slightly lower catalytic activity
for hydrogenation of BYD, but significantly promoted the
selectivity to BED, compared with Raney Ni catalyst. The
presence of Si at Ni-defect sites and the formation of Ni–Si
alloy surfaces block sites for the BED to further hydroge-
nate. Compared with the traditional Lindlar-type catalysts,
such Raney Ni–Si materials can be used extensively in
organic synthesis for selective hydrogenation of alkynes, in
which the doped Si atoms partially tuned metal sites but
without the associated hazards of toxic additives.
0. Chen X, Li M, Guan JC, Wang XK, Williams CT, Liang CH
(2012) Ind Eng Chem Res 51:3604
1. Kang K, Kim SK, Kim CJ, Jo MH (2008) Nano Lett 8:431
2. Liu Z, Zhang H, Wang L, Yang D (2008) Nanotechnology
2
2
1
9:375602
2
2
2
3. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotti RA,
Rouquerol J, Siemieniewska T (1985) Pure Appl Chem 57:603
4. Mikkolaa JP, Vainioa H, Salmia T, Sj o¨ holmb R, Ollonqvistc T,
V a¨ yrynenc J (2000) Appl Catal A 196:143
5. Becker L, Aminpirooz S, Hillert B, Pedio M, Haase J, Adams DL
(
1993) Phys Rev B 47:9710
26. Kovnir K, Armbr u¨ ster M, Teschner D, Venkov TV, Jentoft FC,
Knop-Gericke A, Grin Y, Schl o¨ gl R (2007) Sci Technol Adv
Mater 8:420
2
7. Chen X, Liu X, Wang L, Li M, Williams CT, Liang CH (2013)
RSC Adv 3:1728
28. Song YP, Schmitt AL, Jin S (2007) Nano Lett 7:965
2
9. Chen X, Wang XK, Xiu JH, Williams CT, Liang CH (2012) J
Phys Chem C 116:24968
0. Yu XB, Li HX, Deng JF (2000) Appl Catal A 199:191
1. Lei H, Song Z, Tan DL, Bao XH, Mu XH, Zong BN, Min EZ
3
3
(
2001) Appl Catal A 214:69
Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge the financial support
provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
32. Tschan R, Wandeler R, Schneider MS, Chubert MM, Baiker A
(2001) J Catal 204:219
(
1
(
21373038), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M55
068), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
DUT12YQ03 and DUT14RC(3)007).
33. Bennett JA, Attard GA, Deplanche K, Casadesus M, Huxter SE,
Macaskie LE, Wood J (2012) ACS Catal 2:504
123