C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
When the reaction depicted in eq 8 was run employing 6-fluoro-
,1-diphenyl-1-hexene as an alkyl fluoride, diene 9 was obtained
reagents to generate divinylnickel complex 11, which readily forms
nickel-butadiene complex 12 via reductive coupling. Then, 12
8
1
as the sole coupling product in 71% yield, without formation of
any cyclopentane derivatives, which may arise from ring-closing
of the 6,6-diphenyl-5-hexenyl radical if generated. This result
reacts again with the vinyl Grignard reagent to give 14 via nickelate
complex 13. Subsequent transmetalation of 14 with vinyl Grignard
9
6
reagent regenerates 11 along with allylic Grignard reagent 10 or
15, which reacts with alkyl fluorides, giving rise to 1. Alternatively,
direct reaction of 13 with alkyl fluorides leading to 16 followed
by transmetalation with vinyl Grignard reagent also affords 1. In
this system, cationic magnesium would activate the C-F bond by
the eminent Mg-F interaction.3
would rule out a radical mechanism.
a
When PhCHdCHMgBr is used, the reaction follows a similar
pathway via metallacyclopentene intermediates 10′ and/or 13′,
which react with 2 equiv of alkyl halides at both benzylic positions
(eq 11).
It is known that alkyl iodides, bromides, or chlorides react with
(
2-butene-1,4-diyl)magnesium 10 at a γ-vinylic carbon to give
7
2
-alkyl-3-butenyl Grignard reagents 1. So we carried out the direct
reaction of n-octyl fluoride with 1.5 equiv of 10 in the presence
and absence of a catalytic amount of NiCl (PPh . The time course
2
3 2
)
of the formation of 2 was plotted in Figure 1 together with the
result of the catalytic reaction depicted in eq 10. At any stage of
the reaction, 2 was formed more efficiently in the catalytic system
than in the direct reactions. These results would suggest that a more
reactive intermediate in comparison to 10 might be formed in the
present catalytic system.
In conclusion, a novel dimerization coupling reaction of vinyl
Grignard reagents with alkyl fluorides has been developed with
the aid of Ni catalysts. The present study provides the first example
of a catalytic reaction that demonstrates the superiority of alkyl
fluorides as alkylating reagents over the corresponding bromides
and iodides as well as chlorides,2 which may undergo oxidative
addition toward Ni(0) such as 12 or electron transfer from 13 leading
to the formation of reduction or cross-coupling products. On the
other hand, alkyl fluorides are inert for such reactions, and this is
key to accomplishing this clean reaction.
,3a
Acknowledgment. This research was supported financially in
part by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology of Japan and by JSPS COE program.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
compound characterization data (PDF). This material is available free
of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
(
1) For recent reviews on activation and functionalization of C-F bonds,
see: (a) Richmond, T. G. In Topics in Organometallic Chemistry; Murai,
S., Ed.; Springer: New York, 1999; Vol. 3; pp 243-269. (b) Hiyama, T.
In Organofluorine Compounds Chemistry and Applications; Springer:
New York, 2000.
Figure 1. Time course of the formation of 2 in eqs 9 and 10.
(2) The C-C bond formation has been achieved by use of tertiary alkyl and
allyl fluorides in the presence of R Al or BF as the catalyst: (a) Ooi, T.;
Uraguchi, D.; Kagoshima, N.; Maruoka, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
679. (b) Hirano, K.; Fujita, K.; Yorimitsu, H.; Shinokubo, H.; Oshima,
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2555. In these reactions, C-F bond
3
3
Although the detailed mechanism of this coupling reaction has
not been clarified yet, plausible reaction pathways are shown in
Scheme 1. Nickel dichlorides react with 2 equiv of vinyl Grignard
5
N
cleavage proceeds in S 1 fashion and primary and secondary alkyl
fluorides and corresponding chlorides showed lower reactivity. For
3
substitution of F on sp -carbons with heteroatom nucleophiles, see: (c)
Hirano, K.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4873. (d)
Namavari, M.; Satyamurthy, N.; Barrio, J. R. J. Fluorine Chem. 1995,
Scheme 1. Plausible Reaction Pathways
7
2, 89. (e) Olah, G. A.; Narang, S. C.; Field, L. D. J. Org. Chem. 1981,
4
6, 6, 3727.
(
3) (a) Terao, J.; Ikumi, A.; Kuniyasu, H.; Kambe, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2
003, 125, 5646. (b) Terao, J.; Todo, H.; Watanabe, H.; Ikumi, A.; Kambe,
N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6180.
(
4) Terao, J.; Watanabe, H.; Ikumi, A.; Kuniyasu, H.; Kambe, N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 4222.
(
(
(
5) Farady, L.; Bencze, L.; Marko, L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1969, 17, 107.
6) Newcomb, M.; Choi, S.-Y.; Horner, J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1225.
7) (a) Fujita, K.; Ohnuma, Y.; Yasuda, H.; Tani, H. J. Organomet. Chem.
1
976, 113, 201. (b) Xiong, H.; Rieke, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
3249. (c) Rieke, R. D.; Xiong, H. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 3109.
(
8) (a) Whitesides, G. M.; Casey, C. P.; Krieger, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1
971, 93, 1379. (b) Semmelhack, M. F.; Helquist, P.; Jones, L. D.; Keller,
L.; Mendelson, L.; Ryono, L. S.; Smith, J. G.; Stauffer, R. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6460.
(
9) For magnesium nickelate complexes, see: Kaschube, W.; P o¨ rschke, K.
R.; Angermund, K.; Kr u¨ ger, C.; Wilke, G. Chem. Ber. 1988, 121, 1921.
JA042565R
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 127, NO. 11, 2005 3657