Chemistry Letters 2001
1229
monobromination proceeds quite fast, while dibromination
requires much longer time, and the bromide once formed reacts
gradually with ether to give ethoxy derivatives.16 To suppress
undesired reactions, we changed the solvent from ether to ben-
zene. When n-Hex2SiH2 was treated with 4 equiv of the
CuBr2(CuI) reagent in benzene under reflux for 34 h, n-
Hex2SiBr2 was obtained in 70% isolated yield (run 3).
Mono- and dibrominations of trihydrosilanes are also pos-
sible (runs 6–9). When n-HexSiH3 was treated with 2 equiv of
the CuBr2(CuI) reagent in ether at room temperature for 12 h,
n-HexSiH2Br was obtained in 64% yield as the sole product
after distillation. When n-HexSiH3 was treated with 4 equiv of
the CuBr2(CuI) reagent in benzene at room temperature for 1
week, n-HexSiHBr2 was obtained in 55% isolated yield.
Moreover, the reaction of PhSiH3 with 2 equiv of the reagent in
benzene at room temperature for 6 h afforded PhSiH2Br in 72%
yield, while treatment with 4 equiv of the reagent in benzene at
room temperature for 40 h produced PhSiHBr2 in 67% yield.
References and Notes
1
a) A. Kunai, T. Kawakami, E. Toyoda, and M. Ishikawa,
Organometallics, 11, 2708 (1992). b) M. Ishikawa, E.
Toyoda, M. Ishii, A. Kunai, Y. Yamamoto, and M.
Yamamoto, Organometallics, 13, 808 (1994).
2
3
4
5
6
A. Kunai, T. Sakurai, E. Toyoda, and M. Ishikawa,
Organometallics, 15, 2478 (1996).
J. Ohshita, Y. Toyoshima, A. Iwata, H. Tang, and A.
Kunai, Chem. Lett., 2001, 886.
A. Kunai, T. Sakurai, E. Toyoda, M. Ishikawa, and Y.
Yamamoto, Organometallics, 13, 3233 (1994).
a) H. H. Anderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73, 5804 (1951). b)
M. Kumada, Kogyo Kagaku Zasshi, 55, 373 (1952).
a) P. A. McCusker and E. L. Reilly, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 75,
1583 (1953). b) L. H. Sommer, H. D. Blankman, and P. C.
Millen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73, 3542 (1951).
7
a) J. J. McBride, Jr. and H. C. Beachell, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
74, 5247 (1952). b) B. O. Pray, L. H. Sommer, G. M.
Goldberg, G. T. Kerr, P. A. DiGrogio, and F. C. Whitmore,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 70, 433 (1948).
8
9
M. Kumada, K. Shiina, and M. Yamaguchi, Kogyo Kagaku
Zasshi, 57, 230 (1954).
U. Krüerke, Chem. Ber., 95, 174 (1962).
10 W. H. Nebergall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 72, 4702 (1950).
11 a) W. Steudel and H. Gilman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82, 6129
(1960). b) M. C. Harvey, W. H. Nebergall, and J. S. Peak,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 79, 1437 (1957).
12 H. H. Anderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82, 1323 (1960); 81,
4785 (1959); 80, 5083 (1958).
13 P. B. Gansle, B. C. Gruber, J. T. Jarvis, A. Slaitas, S. D.
Jesus, and K. D. Jesus, Microchem. J., 55, 222 (1997).
14 U. Herzog and G. Roewer, J. Organomet. Chem., 527, 117
(1997).
On the other hand, attempted tribromination with this
reagent did not take place. When PhSiH3 was heated under
reflux in benzene with 6 equiv of the CuBr2(CuI) reagent,
dibromination completed within 3 h,17 much faster than the case
using 4 equiv of the reagent at room temperature. However, the
reaction stopped at this stage, and no tribromide would be
formed even after 1 week. Presumably, accumulation of elec-
tronegative bromine atoms on the same silicon center decreases
the reactivity of the silicon center, as has been observed previ-
ously for the chlorination of fluorohydrosilanes.2
We also performed selective bromination of 1,2-dihydro-
disilanes. Thus, when HEt2SiSiEt2H was treated with 2 equiv
of the reagent in benzene at room temperature for 4 h,
HEt2SiSiEt2Br was obtained in 58% isolated yield, together
with a 10% yield of Et2SiHBr (run 10).
15 A typical procedure is as follows. In a 300-mL flask, was
placed a mixture of MePhSiH2 (6.94 g, 56.7 mmol), CuBr2
(25.66 g, 114.9 mmol), and CuI (0.48 g, 2.5 mmol) in 70
mL of diethyl ether under Ar, and the mixture was stirred
at room temperature for 9 h. The mixture was filtered to
remove Cu salts and concentrated. The residue was dis-
tilled under reduced pressure to give 7.75 g (38.6 mmol,
68%) of MePhSiHBr: b.p. 83–86 °C (16 mmHg); MS m/z
1
200 (M+), 185 (M+–Me), 123 (M+–Ph), 121 (M+–Br); H
NMR (δ in CDCl3) 0.47 (3 H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, Me), 5.31 (1
H, q, J = 3.5 Hz, SiH), 7.42–7.71 (5 H, m, phenyl H); 13C
NMR (δ in CDCl3) 0.36, 127.87, 128.25, 130.94, 133.84;
29Si NMR (δ in CDCl3) –2.98. Anal. Calcd for C7H9BrSi:
C, 48.40; H, 4.51%. Found: C, 48.52; H, 4.60%.
The selectivity of the bromodisilane diminished in this
case, but two products could be readily separated by distillation.
The monosilane may be produced by the cleavage of an Si–Si
bond of disilane with HBr generated during the reaction.
16 Nevertheless, diethyl ether can be used as the solvent for
bromination, unless the reaction requires longer reaction
time. The reaction in ether is faster than in benzene, and
subsequent work up is easy due to the low boiling point.
17 Dibromination of hexylsilane (run 7) may complete also
faster under reflux conditions.
Dedicated to Prof. Hideki Sakurai on the occasion of his
70th birthday.