C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 5. Revised Mechanism for R-Oxygenation of Aldehydes
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammetry measurements in DMF.
Evidence for a TEMPO complexation/enamine addition pathway
was further substantiated by consideration of the oxidation potentials
of the reagents and intermediates involved (Figure 1). It is well-
established that DMF solvation of FeCl
3
induces disproportionation
14a
to [Fe(dmf)
3
Cl
2
][FeCl
4
], a salt which is less oxidizing than FeCl
3
1
4b
by ∼0.5 V. We measured the irreversible oxidation potential of
enamine 2 (derived from catalyst 1) and found that it is well-
matched for oxidation with [FeCp
2 6
][PF ], while oxidation by
[
Fe(dmf) Cl ][FeCl
3
2
4
] is endergonic by ∼0.5 V.
Acknowledgment. Financial support was provided by NIH
NIGMS (R01 01 GM093213-01) and gifts from Merck and Amgen.
J.F.V.H. thanks the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council (NSERC) for a predoctoral fellowship (PGS D).
Table 1. Other Systems for Catalytic Aldehyde R-Oxyamination
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
kinetic investigations, and spectral data for all new compounds. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
a
entry
oxygen source
metal catalyst
% yield
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TEMPO
none
none
Sc(OTf)
Zn(NTf
[Fe(dmf)
Co(salen)
CuCl
11
19
17
12
72
75
82
b
oxoammonium
References
TEMPO
3
TEMPO
2
)
2
(1) (a) Beeson, T. D.; Mastracchio, A.; Hong, J.; Ashton, K.; MacMillan, D. W. C.
Science 2007, 316, 582. (b) Sibi, M. P.; Hasegawa, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 4124. (c) For a stoichiometric, noncatalytic example, see: Narasaka, K.;
Okauchi, T.; Tanaka, K.; Murakami, M. Chem. Lett. 1992, 2099.
TEMPO
3 2 4
Cl ][FeCl ]
TEMPO
TEMPO
2
(
2) (a) Jang, H.-Y.; Hong, J.-B.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
7004. (b) Kim, H.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 398.
a
Yield determined by 1H NMR analysis relative to an internal
standard. Added as a solution in DMF over 1 h using syringe pump.
(
c) Wilson, J. E.; Casarez, A. D.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
b
1
31, 11332. (d) Conrad, J. C.; Kong, J.; Laforteza, B. N.; MacMillan, D. W. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11640. (e) Graham, T. H.; Jones, C. M.; Jui,
N. T.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16494. (f) Rendler,
S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.
Because our mechanistic picture of enamine addition was
founded upon previous studies of TEMPO-metal coordination,
a number of further predictions could be made. First, metal
7-10
(
3) Wang, N.; Liu, R.; Chen, J.; Liang, X. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5322.
(4) (a) Braslau, R.; Burrill, L. C., II; Siano, M.; Naik, N.; Howden, R. K.;
Mahal, L. K. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 6445. (b) Ullrich, J. J. Org. Chem.
complexes known to bind TEMPO in a manner similar to
1
998, 63, 7130.
+
[
Fe(dmf)
3
Cl
2
]
(including CuCl
2
) should effect the desired trans-
(5) Koike, T.; Akita, M. Chem. Lett. 2009, 166.
6) (a) Bui, N.-N.; Ho, X.-H.; Mho, S.-I.; Jang, H.-Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
309. (b) Sch a¨ mann, M.; Sch a¨ fer, H. J. Electrochim. Acta 2005, 50, 4956.
(7) (a) Semmelhack, M. F.; Schmid, C. R.; Cortes, D. A. Tetrahedron Lett.
986, 27, 1119. (b) Vogler, T.; Studer, A. Synthesis 2008, 1979.
8) (a) Laugier, J.; Latour, J.; Caneschi, A.; Rey, P. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30,
(
formation. Second, Lewis acids that do not have an empty d orbital
and thus cannot participate in TEMPO binding should not be
effective. As shown in Table 1, these predictions were compre-
hensively confirmed. Most notably, the use of TEMPO or oxo-
5
1
(
(
4
474. (b) Pervukhina, N. V.; Romanenko, G. V.; Podberezskaya, N. V. J.
1
5
ammonium without metal additives gave results similar to those
for the Sc(OTf) and Zn(NTf cases.
Struct. Chem. 1994, 35, 367.
9) Michel, C.; Belanzoni, P.; Gamez, P.; Reedjik, J.; Baerends, E. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2009, 48, 11909.
3
2 2
)
Finally, kinetic measurements revealed that the initial rate of reaction
depends exclusively on the amine catalyst and aldehyde concentrations,
indicating that enamine formation is rate-determining (Scheme 5).
(10) Dijksman, A.; Arends, I. W. C. E.; Sheldon, R. A. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2
003, 1, 3232.
(
11) Newcomb, M. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 1151.
(12) Cyclopropyl radical ring opening/reclosure prior to productive bond
formation has been observed previously. See: (a) Benkovics, T.; Du, J.;
Guzie, I. A.; Yoon, T. P. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5545. (b) Spence, E. L.;
Langley, J.; Bugg, T. D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8343.
Moreover, while FeCl
3
is essential, identical levels of conversion were
and O [the oxidant for the Sibi protocol is likely
to be TEMPO, which is known to reoxidize Cu(I) to Cu(II) in related
obtained without NaNO
2
2
16
(13) Prins, R.; Korswagen, A. R.; Kortbeek, A. G. T. G. J. Organomet. Chem.
1
972, 39, 335.
17
alcohol oxidations ]. The sum of our results indicate that a significant
revision of the proposed mechanism for the FeCl -catalyzed R-oxyami-
(
14) (a) Tobinaga, S.; Kotani, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 309. (b) Safavi,
A.; Fotouhi, L. Microchem. J. 1998, 60, 224.
3
(
15) A background reaction with aldehyde and oxoammonium (which can also
be formed in situ from TEMPO) was also observed.
nation of aldehydes is required. The mechanistic picture that best fits
literature precedent and the results contained herein is shown in Scheme
(16) Use of 2 equiv of TEMPO allowed it to act as both the oxygen atom source
and the stoichiometric reoxidant for iron (see ref 1b).
18
3 2 2
5. While the results of our investigations suggest that FeCl /NaNO /O
(
17) Sheldon, R. A.; Arends, I. W. C. E. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1051.
will not find application in SOMO catalysis, we expect that activation of
TEMPO by metal complexation will lead to several new and efficient
oxygenation protocols.
(18) Enamine/metal-TEMPO electron transfer followed by solvent-cage radical
combination cannot be excluded on the basis of the studies herein.
JA1043006
1
0014 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 132, NO. 29, 2010