2556
M. T. Martin et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 2555–2557
to triethylsilane.4 It was discovered that addition of only
1 wt % PMHS (0.06 equiv based on 60 g/mol hydride)
was sufficient to fully progress the reaction to comple-
tion even when run fully exposed to the air.
Table 1. Open air cyanation of aryl bromides in the presence of PMHS
Starting materiala
Time
(h)
Temperature
Isolated
yield
(°C)
1.5
1.5
3
80
80
61b
94
91
97
89
63
CF3
O
Br
This finding was confirmed on kilogram scale when the
reaction was conducted without the use of nitrogen or
solvent degassing. To further reduce the cost of this
chemical stage on scale, we investigated the use of less
expensive Pd(OAc)2 as an alternative to the Pd2(dba)3
catalyst. With only 0.9 mol % Pd(OAc)2 and
0.12 mol % DPPF, we found that the reaction reliably
proceeded to completion in the presence of catalytic
PMHS. By eliminating the need for subsequent charges
of catalyst and ligand and utilizing the less expensive
Pd(OAc)2 system, we were able to significantly lower
the cost of this reaction on pilot plant scale.
Br
O
80
Br
MeO
O
1
120
120
120
N
Br
H
3
With these results in mind, we set out to test this proto-
col on a variety of representative aryl bromides to deter-
mine the scope of this process. Table 1 lists the aryl
bromides that were subjected to cyanation reactions
using this protocol. In all cases the reactions were run
completely open to the atmosphere and without degas-
sing the solvent. The reactions generally went to comple-
tion in 1–3 h. Some of the less reactive substrates
(electron rich aryl halides for instance) required elevated
temperatures to achieve complete conversion. The
PMHS does not appear to accelerate the reaction or
increase the reactivity of the catalyst system as com-
pared to the non-PMHS reaction conditions. As with
most palladium catalyzed processes, the catalyst/ligand
combination has a finite lifetime under the reaction con-
ditions and indeed this cyanation reaction can be viewed
as a competition between catalyst lifetime and reaction
progression. Given that these reactions were run open
to the atmosphere, it is impressive to see that they were
able to fully progress before the catalyst was sufficiently
compromised to stall the reaction. Note that for these
MeO
Br
Br
3
MeO
O
Br
2
3
80
80
78
95
Br
N
a All reactions were carried out on 1-g scale in round bottom flasks
fully open to air. The reactions were followed by HPLC and products
characterized by 1H NMR and 13C NMR.
b Product is volatile.
0.3
Addition of catalyst and ligand
representative cases
a higher loading of PMHS
(10 wt %) was utilized in order to insure that both acti-
vated and deactivated substrates would progress to com-
pletion. A loading of 1 wt % is sufficient to allow open
air reactions to go to completion in many cases and
therefore should be completely effective against spurious
air contamination in a typical reaction run under an
inert atmosphere.
0.25
57% by HPLC
0.2
0.15
0.1
89% by HPLC
94% by HPLC
In order to more fully demonstrate the effectiveness of
PMHS in this process, we utilized ReactIR5 to monitor
the cyanation of bromobenzotrifluoride run under both
inert conditions and fully exposed to air. We chose
Pd2(dba)3 as the catalyst source for these comparisons
as it is already in the correct oxidation state to initiate
the catalytic cycle. Figure 1 shows that the reaction per-
formed under inert conditions was complete within 1 h
whereas, the reaction exposed to air stalled after only
30 min. When the same reaction was performed exposed
to air but in the presence of 10 wt % PMHS, the reaction
progressed at essentially the same rate as the inert atmo-
sphere reaction. Note that the absorption of the PMHS
at 1073 cmÀ1 overlaps that of the aryl C–Br bond stretch
and therefore the relative concentration curves for the
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
time (min)
Open to Air w/PMHS
open to air w/out PMHS
inerted w/out PMHS
Figure 1.
innerted reaction and PMHS treated reactions do not
overlay precisely.
The extent of reaction completion was verified by
HPLC. A possible explanation could involve a silyl
hydride reduction of the oxidized palladium back to
palladium(0). However, in reactions that were purpo-