A. Harilal et al.
MMA and IBA. Therefore, the presence of the oxygen
insertion function along with the water co-feed is not
essential, especially in the case where only oxidative
dehydrogenation is desired [40]. This may be the reason
why iron phosphate, which has no oxygen insertion func-
tion, promotes selectively the oxidative dehydrogenation
reactions in the presence of water.
References
1. Nagai K (2001) Appl Catal A 221:367–377
2. Ullmann F, Gerhartz W, Yamamoto YS, Campbell FT, Pfeffer-
korn R, Rounsaville JF (2003) Ullmann’s encyclopedia of
industrial chemistry. Wiley, New York
3. Wittcoff HA, Reuben BG, Plotkin JS (2012) Chemicals and
polymers from ethylene. In: Industrial organic chemicals, Wiley,
New York, pp 139–209
4. Wittcoff HA, Reuben BG, Plotkin JS (2012) Chemicals and
polymers from propylene. In: Industrial organic chemicals,
Wiley, New York, pp 211–271
5. Merger F, Fouquet G (1982) Preparation of methyl methacrylate
by reaction of methyl propionate and methanol. US Patent No.
US4336403
6. Mizuno M, Seo T, Suzuta T (2008) Methyl methacrylate pro-
duction process. European Patent No. EP2003114A1
7. Chou CS, Neglia KD, Szamborski EC (2003) Crosslinked shell-
core polymer with alkyl (meth)acrylate monomers. US Patent No.
US6534592
8. Hitoshi A, Kiyokazu I (1967) Methyl methacrylate syrup com-
position containing poly-alpha-methyl styrene. US Patent No.
US3309424
4 Conclusion
The synthesized iron phosphate catalyst (CAT 1) with a
P/Fe ratio of 1.2 and the commercial grade iron phosphate
(CAT 2) with a P/Fe ratio of 1.0 showed the presence of
both quartz and trydimite like phases. The formation of the
iron pyrophosphate phase (Fe2P2O7), which is obtained by
the reduction of the iron phosphate phase, was observed at
500 °C for both the catalysts which is also evidenced in the
TPR of the catalysts. The TPD-NH3 profiles of both the
catalysts revealed Lewis and Brønsted acidic sites and
CAT 1 has significantly more Brønsted acidic sites when
compared to CAT 2.
9. Gander R (1974) Novel methacrylate monomer. US Patent No.
US3853962
10. Philip GB (1969) Polymeric styrene or alkyl methacrylate
copolymers made by 3-stage granular polymerization process. US
Patent No. US3458603
Oxidative dehydrogenation reactions of MIB in a con-
tinuous flow fixed bed reactor showed that CAT 1 was
effective in the ODH of MIB to the desired product methyl
methacrylate. The conversion of MIB, as well as the yield
of methyl methacrylate was higher over CAT 1 at both
contact times of 0.4 s and 0.8 s which is due to the higher
Brønsted acidity of CAT 1. Better results were obtained at
a contact time of 0.8 s. Co-feeding water showed an
increase in conversion of MIB over both the catalysts.
However, due to the hydrolysis of MMA and IBA with co-
feeding of water, the selectivity towards MMA was lower
than in the case without co-feeding of water over both the
catalysts especially at the temperatures above 400 °C. It
can be observed that MMA is the precursor for MAA by
the hydrolysis of MMA in the presence of water as co-feed.
CAT 1 showed a 36 % maximum initial yield of MMA at a
contact time of 0.8 s, whereas CAT 2 gave a 23 % maxi-
mum initial yield of MMA, both at a temperature of
400 °C. The mechanisms of formation of the products from
´
11. Joo F (2002) Biphasic catalysis: homogeneous. In: Encyclopedia
of catalysis, Wiley, New York
12. Schulze J, Homann M (1989) C4-hydrocarbons and derivatives:
resources production marketing. Springer, New York
13. Wittcoff HA, Reuben BG, Plotkin JS (2012) Chemicals from
alkanes. In: Industrial organic chemicals, Wiley, New York,
pp 463–474
14. Casa-Resino I, Perez-Lopez M, Soler-Rodrıguez F (2014) Methyl
Methacrylate. In: Wexler P (ed) Encyclopedia of toxicology, 3rd
edn. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 314–317
15. Nagaki A, Miyazaki A, Tomida Y, J-i Yoshida (2011) Chem Eng
J 167:548–555
´
16. Millet J-M, Vedrine J (2001) Top Catal 15:139–144
17. Aboukaıs A, Ghoussoub D, Blouet-Crusson E, Rigole M, Guelton
´
´
´
¨
M (1994) Appl Catal A 111:109–118
18. Reid EE (1949) Ind Eng Chem Res 41:1863–1867
19. Haynes A, Maitlis PM, Morris GE, Sunley GJ, Adams H, Badger
PW, Bowers CM, Cook DB, Elliott PIP, Ghaffar T, Green H,
Griffin TR, Payne M, Pearson JM, Taylor MJ, Vickers PW, Watt
RJ (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:2847–2861
20. Tian J-S, Miao C-X, Wang J-Q, Cai F, Du Y, Zhao Y, He L-N
(2007) Green Chem 9:566–571
21. Millet J-MM (1998) Catal. Rev Sci Eng 40:1–38
22. Grasselli R (2002) Top Catal 21:79–88
MIB over the iron phosphate catalysts involves the Fe2?
/
23. Campanati M, Fornasari G, Vaccari A (2003) Catal Today
77:299–314
Fe3? redox couple and the mechanism follows a similar
pathway to the Mars and van Krevelen mechanism. Over-
all, CAT 1 showed high yield of MMA (21 %) when
compared to CAT2 (11 %), due to the higher acidic nature
of the catalyst.
24. Spivey JJ, Anderson JA, Dooley KM, Castaldi MJ (2009)
Catalysis. Royal Society of Chemistry, London
25. Suib SL (2013) New and future developments in catalysis:
catalysis for remediation and environmental concerns. Elsevier,
Amsterdam
26. Bullock RM (2011) Catalysis without precious metals. Wiley,
New York
27. Sheldon RA, van Bekkum H (2008) Fine chemicals through
heterogeneous catalysis. Wiley, New York
Acknowledgments We would like to thank SASOL, NRF and
THRIP (Grant No: TP1208035643) for financial support. Thanks are
also extended to the University of KwaZulu-Natal for the financial
support and facilities. V. D. B. C. D thanks UKZN for a post-doctoral
fellowship.
¨
¨
28. Ertl G, Knozinger H, Schuth F, Weitkamp J (2008) Handbook of
heterogeneous catalysis, vol 8. Wiley, New York
123