140
J. Xu et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 423 (2006) 138–142
Fig. 3. (a) Low-magnification TEM image of a LaB6 nanowire. The globule in the graph is a LaB6 nanoparticle. (b) The HRTEM observation suggests
that the growth direction of LaB6 nanowires is parallel to the [111] direction. The inset shows a typical selected-area electron diffraction pattern of the
ꢀ
nanowire from the ½224ꢀ direction.
Fig. 3a it can be seen that globules are also exist in our
product. The diameter of the LaB6 nanowires is around
25 nm and the length extend to a few micrometers. Detailed
structural characterization of the LaB6 nanowires was per-
formed using HRTEM. Fig. 3b shows a typical lattice-
resolved HRTEM image of the LaB6 nanowire shown in
Fig. 3a. It reveals that the LaB6 nanowire is single crystal-
line in nature and free of dislocation and structure defects.
The lattice spacing of 0.240 nm corresponds to the d-spac-
ing of the (111) crystal faces, which indicates that the
growth direction of the nanowires is parallel to the [111]
direction. Also the high-resolution transmission electron
microscopy lattice image indicates that the nanowire was
solid inside. In addition the same structural features are
found in other nanowires by careful HRTEM observation.
In order to identify the crystal lattice of LaB6 nanowire
selected-area electron diffraction patterns were performed,
and the inset of Fig. 3b shows electron diffraction pattern
nearly 30 nm. From the TEM figures we present here it is
hard to conclude that the nanotubes are open in the tips
or not, and this may need to be clarified in the future work.
It is worth noticing that the two nanotubes have the similar
morphology, that is to say the inner wall of the nanotubes
is rough. The selected-area electron diffraction (SAED)
pattern in Fig. 4b shows that the nanotubes are polycrys-
talline structure, which is contrast with that for nanowires
where the single structure is adopted. It is difficult to attri-
bute the polycrystalline structure of the LaB6 nanotubes to
electron beam damage because one of the most excellent
properties of LaB6 is the resistance to electron bombard-
ment [21]. The diffraction pattern of nanotube can be read-
ily indexed as (100), (111), (311) of the primary cubic
structure with lattice constant a agreeing with our X-ray
diffraction measurement result of the products obtained
on the clean Si substrate as well as selected-area electron
diffraction result of nanorods.
One question that need addressing is how the LaB6
nanowires grow. The TEM analysis shows that the nano-
wires may not be dominated by the conventional vapor–
liquid–solid (VLS) mechanism proposed for nanofibers
grown by a catalyst-assisted process, in which a transition
metal particle is capped at the tip of the fiber and serves as
the active catalystic site [22]. In our experiment we did not
observed any metal particles in LaB6 nanowires and nano-
tubes in extensive TEM observations, which give no evi-
dence to support the VLS mechanism. Thus, the growth
procedure may be describe as ‘self-catalytic’ growth [23],
that is to say, in our experiment the melting metal La plays
the role of reactant and catalyst simultaneously. In order to
give a conceptual description of the growth of the LaB6
ꢀ
taken along ½224ꢀ crystal zone axes. The electron diffrac-
tion pattern shows that the LaB6 nanowires adopt single
crystal structure which has a cubic structure and the lattice
constant a agrees well with our X-ray diffraction measure-
ment result.
It is interesting that LaB6 nanotubes were also found at
the same experiment. Fig. 4a shows a representative TEM
image of the LaB6 nanotubes. In Fig. 4a two worm-like
nanotubes were observed and the diameters of them are
not uniform. It can be seen from Fig. 4a that the diameter
of bigger nanotube is ranging 200–400 nm and the length
extending to 1 lm with the wall thickness around 60 nm,
and the smaller one has the diameter of about 200 nm
and the length around 400 nm with the wall thickness