ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Li et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 305 (2006) 448–451
451
surface (highlighted by five small arrows). The lines A and
˚
in CoCr O NCs can be attributed not only to the nanosize
2 4
effect mentioned above, but also to the crystal defects and
lattice distortion.
¯
B are along ½2 2 0ꢃ direction (atomic spacing of 2.96 A) and
˚
1 1 1] direction (atomic spacing of 4.84 A), respectively. It
[
is evident that the atoms of the NCs deviate from their
normal sites, especially for the atoms near the surface. The
broadening of the lattice spacing can also be verified by
direct measurement from the image. In addition, some
atomic steps exist at surface partially pointed by letter C
and two big arrows.
4
. Conclusion
CoCr O nanoceramic was synthesized under a mild
2
4
condition. Large lattice distortion and large numbers of
surface defects are present in the CoCr O nanocrystallites.
Besides the nano-size effect on the magnetic properties, the
co-existence of a large coercivity and an exchange bias in
CoCr O nanocrystallites mainly results from the lattice
2
4
The XRD and HRTEM results reveal that strong lattice
distortion and a large amount of surface defects are
presented in the CoCr O NCs. The anomalous magnetic
2
4
2
4
properties deviated from the bulk materials should be
attributed to these special microstructures in CoCr O
distortion and surface defects.
2
4
NCs.
Ferrimagnetic bulk CoCr O has a normal spinel
Acknowledgments
2
4
structure, and the magnetic coupling is carried out through
the super-exchange interaction between the metal ions via
oxygen ions, which is sensitive to the local atomic
environment, such as the length and angle of chemical
bonds etc. For NCs, the broken symmetry at the surface,
broken bonds, some degree of structural disorder result in
the super-exchange interaction fluctuates in both strength
and sign, and thus the magnetic structure, especially at
surface, deviates from the perfect crystal [16,17]. Therefore,
the nanosize effect dramatically influences the magnetic
properties in nanoscaled oxide systems. Much recently, a
special surface spin structure has been reported in some
nanoscaled ferrimagnetic oxide systems, such as NiFe O ,
This work was financially supported by National Key
Project for Basic Research (G1999064508), National
Science Foundation of China (10504010, 2005J023) and
the Nanotechnology Laboratory of Jiangsu Province.
References
[
1] J. Nogue
Munoz, M.D. Baro
[2] V.F. Puntes, K.M. Krishnan, A.P. alivisatos, Science 291 (2001) 2115.
´
s, J. Sort, V. Langlais, V. Skumryev, S. Surin
ˇ
ach, J.S.
ˇ
´
, Phys. Rep. 422 (2005) 65.
[
3] M.M. Ibrahim, S. Darwish, M.S. Seehra, Phys. Rev. B 51 (1995)
995.
2
2
4
[
[
4] H.L. Huang, J.J. Lu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 (1999) 710.
5] A.E. Berkowitz, J.A. Lahut, I.S. Jacobs, L.M. Levinson, D.W.
Forester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) 594.
CoFe O and a-Fe O , and even in antiferromagnetic
2
4
2
3
metallic oxide NCs, such as NiO and MnO, etc. [7,17–23].
A surface layer with noncollinear spins in oxide NCs has
¨
been demonstrated by means of Mossbauer spectra and
polarized neutron diffraction, etc. [18,20,24,25]. A clear
separation of core and shell magnetic properties has been
reported. In this picture, the NC is described as a magnetic
bilayer with different anisotropies, interactions and mag-
netic structure. The surface anisotropy has also been
invoked as the origination of the anomalous magnetic
properties of NCs at low temperature.
[6] D. Lin, A.C. Nunes, C.F. Majkrzak, A.E. Berkowitz, J. Magn.
Magn. Mater. 145 (1995) 343.
[7] R.H. Kodama, A.E. Berkowitz, E.J. McNiff Jr., S. Foner, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 77 (1996) 394.
[
[
8] G. Hu, Y. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 276601.
9] S.D. Li, H. Bi, Z.J. Tian, F. Xu, B.X. Gu, M. Lu, Y.W. Du, J. Magn.
Magn. Mater. 281 (2004) 11.
[
[
[
[
10] W.H. Meiklejohn, C.P. Bean, Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1413.
11] J. Nogues, I.K. Schuller, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192 (1999) 203.
´
12] A.E. Berkowitz, J.H. Greiner, J. Appl. Phys. 36 (1965) 3330.
13] W.H. Meiklejohn, J. Appl. Phys. 33 (1962) 1328.
In our system, the microstructure of the CoCr O NCs is
2
4
[14] T.C. Schulthess, W.H. Butler, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 198–199 (1999)
321.
far different from the bulk material. Even in CoCr O
2
4
[
[
15] X.D. Zhou, W. Huebner, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 (2001) 3512.
16] A.E. Berkowitz, F.E. Spada, F.T. Parker, in: G.C. Hadjipanayis,
R.W. Siegel (Eds.), Nanophase Materials, Academic Press,
New York, 1994, p. 587.
NCs, the microstructure near surface is distinct from that
in inner atoms. These facts indicate that the spin
configuration of the atoms near the surface deviates from
normal ferrimagnetic coupling of CoCr O bulk materials.
4
2
[17] A.H. Morrish, K. Haneda, J. Appl. Phys. 52 (1981) 2496.
[18] A.E. Berkowitz, IEEE Trans. Magn. 22 (1986) 466.
In comparison with the oxides particle system mentioned
above [7,16–23], the crystal defects and lattice distortion in
CoCr O NCs further extend the difference of magnetic
[
[
[
[
[
[
19] R.H. Kodama, A.E. Berkowitz, E.J. McNiff Jr., S. Foner, J. Appl.
Phys. 81 (1997) 5552.
2
4
20] D. Lin, A.C. Nunes, C.F. Majkrzak, A.E. Bokerwitz, J. Magn.
Magn. Mater. 145 (1995) 343.
structure between surface atoms and inner ones, and
increase the surface magnetic anisotropy, leading to an
exchange bias and an increase of coercivity. As compar-
ison, a CoCr O sample with a large crystallite size
21] S.A. Makhlouf, F.T. Parker, F.E. Spada, A.E. Berkowitz, J. Appl.
Phys. 81 (1997) 5561.
22] G.H. Lee, S.H. Huh, J.W. Jeong, B.J. Choi, S.H. Kim, H.C. Ri,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 12094.
23] H. Bi, S.D. Li, Y.C. Zhang, Y.W. Du, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 277
2
4
(
and Cr O at 1673 K for 40 h. In this case, the coercivity is
41 mm) was prepared by calcining the mixture of Co O
3
4
2
3
(
2004) 363.
24] R. Pynn, J.B. Hayter, S.W. Charles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 710.
only 89.2 kA/m at 2 K and the exchange bias was not
observed. Consequently, the anomalous magnetic properties
[25] A.H. Morrish, K. Haneda, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 35 (1983) 105.