66
I. Mucha / Thermochimica Acta 538 (2012) 63–66
experimental points corresponding to eutectic at 84.8 mol% Bi2Se3
melting at 913.9 K. The points reach as far as to 97.00 mol% Bi2Se3
(Table 1, No. 59) which corroborates the solid solution existence
above this alloy composition.
The melting points of compounds containing 50.0 mol%
Bi2X3 increase in the direction of higher stability of respec-
tive thallium chalcogenobismuthates (793.2 K TlBiTe2 → 895.0 K
Tl2Bi2TeSe3 → 951.1 K TlBiSe2), resulted from more ionic character
of chemical bonding in Bi2Se3 than in Bi2Te3.The same tendency
can be observed for the compounds formed above 50.0 mol%
Bi2X3 (817.9 K Tl0.83Bi1.06Te2 → 946.7 K Tl6Bi14Te3Se21 → 992.4 K
In case of compounds formed at 10.0 mol% Bi2X3, an opposite
effect may be observed. The melting point of Tl9BiTe6 contain-
ing as much as 90.0 mol% Tl2Te is by 19.4 K higher than that of
Tl18Bi2Te9Se3 and 28 K higher than that of Tl9BiSe6. This is undoubt-
edly effect of quite substantial ionic contribution to the chemical
bonding in Tl2Te. The stability of thallium telluride is higher than
that of thallium selenide which results in higher melting point of
the first.
5. Conclusions
The results of the present study differ considerably from those of
[6] in some details. The authors of [6] considered the Tl2Te–Bi2Se3
system to be non-quasibinary while it appeared a quasi-binary
one. They reported the presence of ␣, ␣ꢀ,  and ␥ phases together
with two- and three-phase regions. It should especially be noted
that according to the phase diagram published in [6] (Fig. 1.) no
quaternary compounds were formed, however we observed two
maximums on the liquidus line at 10.0 mol% Bi2Se3 and at 50.0 mol%
Bi2Se3.
There are two possible reasons for these discrepancies. The first
is the limitations of the differential thermal analysis employed by
the former authors. In the DTA method the samples are not stirred
and therefore the phase transformations occur under nonequilib-
rium conditions. Unlike DTA, the TA method used in this study
enabled the solid and liquid phases to be in equilibrium on cool-
ing due to efficient stirring, which resulted in precise temperature
measurements of the phase transitions in the examined alloys.
ment impossible. The glass formation appears very easily when the
alloy is not stirred.
The phase diagram for the system Tl2Te–Bi2Se3 resembled that
for the Tl2Se–Bi2Se3 [1] and Tl2Te–Bi2Te3 [2] systems. The similar-
ity of the phase diagrams might be expected because the systems
are analogous. In all of them at least three compounds are formed,
in the system Tl2Te–Bi2Te3 one additional (fourth) compound
TlBi7Se11 is formed.
References
[1] Z. Sztuba, I. Mucha, W. Gaweł, Phase equilibria in the quasi-binary thallium(I)
selenide–bismuth(III) selenide system, Pol. J. Chem. 78 (2004) 789–794.
[2] W. Gaweł, E. Zaleska, J. Terpiłowski, Phase diagram for the thallium
telluride–bismuth telluride system, J. Therm. Anal. 35 (1989) 59–68.
[3] Y.L. Chen, Z.K. Liu, J.G. Analytis, J.-H. Chu1, H.J. Zhang, B.H. Yan, S.-K. Mo,
R.G. Moore, D.H. Lu, I.R. Fisher, S.C. Zhang, Z. Hussain, Z.-X. Shen, Single Dirac
cone topological surface state and unusual thermoelectric property of com-
pounds from a new topological insulator family, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010),
266401/1–266401/4.
[4] T. Sato, K. Segawa, H. Guo, K. Sugawara, S. Souma, T. Takahashi, Y. Ando, Direct
evidence for the Dirac-cone topological surface states in the ternary chalco-
genide TlBiSe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010), 136802/1–136802/4.
[5] S. Yamanaka, A. Kosuga, K. Kurosaki, Thermoelectric properties of Tl9BiTe6, J.
Alloys Compd. 351 (2003) 14–17.
[6] S.M. Veisova, Z.A. Guseinov, Yu A. Yusibov, M.B. Babanly, Reciprocal system
3Tl2Se + Bi2Te3 ↔ 3Tl2Te + Bi2Se3, Zh. Neorg. Khim. 48 (2003) 1562–1568.
´
[7] W. Gaweł, in: K. Swia˛tkowski (Ed.), Metallurgy on the Turn of the 20th Century,
Committee of Metallurgy of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Publishing House
AKAPIT, Kraków, 2002, pp. 413–436.