Paper
RSC Advances
and form larger sizes, while MoSe2 retains its nanometric size
distribution in the MoSe2@Cu2Se composite. Aer etching
processes, the XRD pattern of Cu2Se disappeared, showing only
the pattern corresponding to MoSe2 (Fig. 2A-(iv)). From the XRD
result, it can be concluded that the Cu2Se was successfully
eliminated.
Results and discussion
Structure and morphology of porous MoSe2
The crystallographic structures and phase purity of as-prepared
materials were determined by XRD. Fig. 2A-(i), shows the
diffraction peaks in the two-theta range of 10–80ꢂ which implies
the crystalline nature of the obtained materials. The
asymmetric-shaped and broadening diffraction peaks, which
are the typical features of 2D nanosheets, demonstrate that the
MoSe2 rose-like structure is completely comprised of layered
akes.12 All of these diffraction peaks are in good agreement
with the characteristic planes i.e., (002), (100), (103) and (110) of
the hexagonal MoSe2 phase (JCPDS 29-0914), revealing the high
purity of the as-synthesized product. In the case of copper
selenide synthesis, Fig. 2A-(ii), the XRD patterns exhibit well-
dened peaks which were indicated with the standard pattern
of Cu2Se (JCPDS no. 01-088-2043). Fig. 2A-(iii) shows the XRD
pattern of the composite Mo@Cu selenide. It can be seen that
all diffraction peaks in the MoSe2@Cu2Se composite the X-ray
diffraction patterns can be separated from the compounds
either MoSe2 or Cu2Se, demonstrating a phase purity of the
synthesized product. In addition, the peaks compatible with
those indicated by the virgin MoSe2 are enlarged. These char-
acteristics show that the Cu2Se compound tends to aggregate
Fig. 2B-(i) presents the morphology of pure MoSe2 produced
by the solvothermal process involving (NH4)6Mo7O24$4H2O as the
Mo source and SeO2 as the Se source. The morphology of pristine
MoSe2 can be described as the rose-like microsphere that
consists of a large number of petals. While Cu2Se has an irregular
morphology in the form of dense nanoplates and/or nano-
crystals, Fig. 2B-(ii). Even though pure MoSe2 and composite
MoSe2@Cu2Se have rose-like microsphere morphology, the
petals of pure MoSe2 are thinner than that from MoSe2@Cu2Se
composite. Also, compared spaces between the petals of the
material composite are denser than MoSe2. Fig. 2B-(iv) shows
SEM images indicate that aer etching the composite of the rose-
like structures remains intact with more porous and opened
structure. Such enormous nanosheets could provide a large
number of active sites accompanied with a large specic surface
area. The dispersion homogeneity of the different components is
supported by the selected element mapping of Mo, Cu and Se
(ESI Fig. S1†). The mapping of MoSe2@Cu2Se composite sample
demonstrates clearly the existence of each element, in addition to
being well distributed over the composite material. Aer the
etching process, no copper element was detected. This mapping
conrms that the etching process has been done successfully.
The low-resolution TEM images in Fig. 3A and B indicate the
rose-like structure formation of porous MoSe2. High-resolution
transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of the
MoSe2 reveal the microscopic phase information as well as the
thickness of the MoSe2. It can be seen that each section of the
nanoowers presenting a shape of a petal is actually an indi-
vidual stack of 2D MoSe2 thin layers. A large amount of active
sites can be attributed to widely distributed petals, which would
offer much more active sites for HER. The spacing between two
adjacent monolayers is 0.277 nm, which is consistent with the
value of MoSe2 interlayer spacing of the (100) plane (Fig. 3C).
The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) results also reect
the (002) planes of 2H-MoSe2 clearly in the inset Fig. 3C. Fig. 3D
shows the other plane of MoSe2 obtained from the average
values for ve layers is 0.72 nm, in good accordance with the
thickness of the atomic layer of Se–Mo–Se unit where the c-axis
orients normal to the (002) lattice plane. Therefore, we conclude
that the MoSe2 porous microspheres are composed of MoSe2
monolayer akes in an incompact way. Furthermore, the
comparison between TEM images of pure MoSe2 (ESI Fig. S2A†)
and MoSe2 aer etching process (ESI Fig. S2B†), the pure MoSe2
looks denser than those MoSe2 aer etching. On the other word,
aer took Cu2Se out from composite material, MoSe2 becomes
hollow. To prove that the specic area increased indeed, Bru-
nauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method was used to measure the
surface area of the pure and etched MoSe2. ESI Fig. S3A† shows
nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms for the porous
MoSe2 sample. It showed a hysteresis loop curve, which is the
characteristic of a mesoporous material. BET specic surface
Fig. 2 (A) The XRD pattern and (B) the SEM morphology of the as-
prepared materials grown by solvothermal method (i) MoSe2, (ii)
Cu2Se, (iii) MoSe2@Cu2Se and (iv) porous MoSe2 after etching the
Cu2Se.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 52345–52351 | 52347