Communications
activity remains the same upon the addition of more than
.8 equiv of a to 1 (even up to 4.5 equiv), indicating that in this
region the catalysis is dominated by self-assembled chelating
ligands. The decrease in activity observed in the presence of
small amounts of a confirms that dabco is ditopically bound
between two porphyrins of different ligands.
The selectivity of the reaction is very sensitive to the a/1
ratio, and only around a/1 = 1.5 does the catalyst assembly
give high selectivity for the linear aldehyde (Figure 2b).
Apparently, the sandwich-type complex must have three
bridging dabco molecules to be highly selective. The selec-
tivity is likely associated with the rigidity of the assembly
formed. If there is a shortage of dabco, the sandwich assembly
has only one or two bridging dabco units, and in the presence
of excess dabco the binding of a fourth dabco will compete
with the third ditopically bound dabco molecule. In both
situations this leads to less rigid chelate assemblies and lower
selectivities.
c) J. L. Atwood, L. J. Barbour, M. J. Hardie, C. L. Raston,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 222, 3; d) G. F. Swiegers, T. J. Malefe-
tse, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 3483; e) M. Albrecht, Chem. Rev.
0
2001, 101, 3457; f) S. Leininger, B. Olenyuk, P. J. Stang, Chem.
Rev. 2000, 100, 853; g) B. J. Holliday, C. A. Mirkin, Angew.
Chem. 2001, 113, 2076; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2022.
4] a) D. N. Reinhoudt, M. Crego-Calama, Science, 2002, 295, 2403;
b) O. Ikkala, G. ten Brinke, Science, 2002, 295, 2407; c) G. R.
Desiraju, Nature, 2001, 412, 397; c) R. F. Service, Science 2001
293, 782.
[5] For reviews see: a) J. K. M. Sanders, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 1378;
b) P. D. Beer, P. A. Gale, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 502; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 486; c) M. C. Feiters, in Compr.
Supramol. Chem., Vol. 10, Elsevier, Oxford 1996, 267; d) R.
Breslow, S. D. Dong, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1997; e) K. Takahashi,
Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2013; f) W. B. Motherwell, M. J. Bingham,
Y. Six, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 4663; g) M. T. Reetz, Top Catal.
1997, 4, 187; h) Y. Murakami, J.-I Kikuchi, Y. Hisaeda, O.
Hayashida, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 721.
[
[6] a) R. Wyler, J. de Mendoza, J. Rebek Jr., Angew. Chem. 1993,
105, 1820; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1699; b) M.
In conclusion, a new supramolecular approach is pre-
sented for the preparation of self-organized transition-metal
catalyst systems. The multicomponent assembly of two
Morgan, J. Rebek Jr., Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1647 – 1668; c) J.
Rebek Jr., Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996, 25, 255 – 264; d) J. Rebek Jr.,
Chem. Commun. 2000, 637 – 643; e) F. Hof, S. L. Craig, C.
Nuckolls, J. Rebek Jr. , Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 1556; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1488; f) A. Jasat, J. C. Sherman, Chem.
Rev. 1999, 99, 931; g) L. R. MacGillivray, J. L. Atwood, Angew.
Chem. 1999, 111, 1080; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1018;
h) C. J. Jones, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27, 289.
(
zinc(ii) porphyrin)phosphite ligands 1 and three ditopic
dabco ligands into the sandwich-type structure 2 leads to a
supramolecular chelating bidentate ligand. This chelate effect
was responsible for the high selectivity for the linear aldehyde
in the rhodium-catalyzed hydroformylation of 1-octene. The
selectivity is very sensitive to the a/1 ratio used, and we
showed that three bridging dabco ligands are required for
high selectivity. This novel supramolecular approach for the
preparation of chelating ligands has proven to be successful,
and the regioselectivity and activity in the hydroformylation
observed for the catalyst assembly ranks it among the best
[
7] a) J. Kang, J. Rebek Jr., Nature, 1997, 385, 50; b) J. Kang, G.
Hilmersson, J. Santamaria, J. Rebek Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 3650; c) J. Kang, J. Santamaria, G. Hilmersson, J. Rebek Jr.,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7389; d) M. Yoshizawa, T.
Kusukawa, M. Fujita, S. Sakamoto, K. Yamaguchi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10454; e) M. Yoshizawa, Y. Takeyama, T.
Okano, M. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3243; f) M.
Yoshizawa, Y. Takeyama, T. Kusukawa, M. Fujita, Angew.
Chem. 2002, 114, 1403; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1347;
g) R. Warmuth, J. L. Kerdelhue, S. S. Carrera, K. J. Langenwal-
ter, N. Brown, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 102; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2002, 41, 96.
[
19]
systems at present.
Experimental Section
For the synthesis of tris(5-(phenyl-2-yl)-10,15,20-tris(phenyl)zinc(ii)
porphyrin)phosphite 1 and further experimental details, see the
Supporting Information.
[
8] a) V. F. Slagt, J. N. H. Reek, P. C. J. Kamer, P. W. N. M. van -
Leeuwen, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 4401; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 4271; b) G. A. Morris, S. T. Nguyen, J. T. Hupp, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 2001, 174, 15; c) M. L. Merlau, M. Del.
Pilar Meija, S. T. Nguyen, J. T. Hupp, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113,
Received: July 31, 2003 [Z52525]
4
369; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4239.
Keywords: homogenous catalysis · hydroformylation ·
porphyrinoids · self-assembly · supramolecular chemistry
.
[9] a) N. Bampos, V. Marvaud, J. K. M. Sanders, Chem. Eur. J. 1998,
4, 335; b) C. C. Mak, N. Bampos, J. K. M. Sanders, Angew. Chem.
1
998, 110, 3169; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3020; c) C. C.
Mak, N. Bampos, S. L. Darling, M. Montalti, L. Prodi, J. K. M.
Sanders, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4476; d) C. A. Hunter, M. N.
Meah, J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5773;
e) C. A. Hunter, M. N. Meah, J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 5780.
[
1] L. J. Prins, D. N. Reinhoudt, P. Timmerman, Angew. Chem. 2001,
13, 2446; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2382.
1
[
2] a) B. Olenyuk, J. A. Whiteford, A. Fechtenkötter, P. J. Stang,
Nature 1999, 398, 796; b) M. Fujita, N. Fujita, K. Ogura, K.
Yamaguchi, Nature 1999, 400, 52; c) L. J. Prins, J. Huskens, F.
de Jong, P. Timmerman, D. N. Reinhoudt, Nature 1999, 398, 498;
d) N. Takeda, K. Umemoto, K. Yamaguchi, M. Fujita, Nature
[
[
10] At these concentrations the formation of larger assemblies is
unlikely, and indeed the spectroscopic data did not indicate
formation of such species.
11] We have analyzed the titration curves with a fitting program
developed by Hunter et al.: A. P. Bisson, C. A. Hunter, J. Carlos,
K. Young, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 845.
1
999, 398, 794; e) K. A. Jolliffe, P. Timmerman, D. N. Reinhoudt,
Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 983; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
33; f) L. R. MacGillivray, J. L. Atwood, Nature 1997, 389, 469;
g) L. J. Prins, F. de Jong, P. Timmerman, D. N. Reinhoudt, Nature
000, 408, 181.
9
[12] This complex was prepared in situ by mixing [Rh(acac)(CO)
with (zinc(ii) porphyrin)phosphite 1 in a 1:2 ratio.
]
2
2
[
3] a) J.-M. Lehn in Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and
Perspectives, VCH, Weinheim, 1995; b) M. Ortega Lorenzo,
C. J. Baddeley, C. Muryn, R. Raval, Nature 2000, 404, 376;
[13] These signals are similar to those found for other phosphite
rhodium complexes: a) G. J. H. Buisman, E. Vos, P. C. J. Kamer,
P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1995, 409;
5
622
ꢀ 2003 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5619 –5623