Paper
RSC Advances
there were no obviously difference in CH
4
oxidation activity.
8 J.-Y. Luo, M. Meng, J.-S. Yao, X.-G. Li, Y.-Q. Zha, X. Wang and
T.-Y. Zhang, Appl. Catal., B, 2009, 87, 92–103.
9 T. Tabakova, L. Ilieva, I. Ivanov, R. Zanella, J. W. Sobczak,
W. Lisowski, Z. Kaszkur and D. Andreeva, Appl. Catal., B,
2013, 136–137, 70–80.
However, aer higher temperature calcinations at 600 and
ꢁ
7
00 C, the activity was dramatically suppressed, with a
ꢁ
complete CH conversion of 50% at 570 and 750 C, respec-
4
4
tively. The activity variation order for CO and CH oxidation are
different as calcination temperature increases from 400 to 700 10 Z. Zhao, X. Lin, R. Jin, G. Wang and T. Muhammad, Appl.
ꢁ
C, which are caused by the dinstinct active species in CO and
Catal., B, 2012, 115–116, 53–62.
CH
4
oxidation reactions. In a word, sample at x ¼ 0.1 aer 11 S. Vivekanandhan, M. Venkateswarlu, D. Carnahan,
ꢁ
calcination at 500 C can act as an excellent catalyst for CO
oxidation, but also for CH catalytic oxidation.
M. Misra, A. K. Mohanty and N. Satyanarayana, Ceram.
Int., 2013, 39, 4105–4111.
4
1
2 Z. Zhao, X. Lin, Y. Zeng, T. Bao, R. Jin and T. Muhammad,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 1873–1882.
3 M. Zhang, D. Jiang and H. Jiang, Mater. Res. Bull., 2012, 47,
4006–4012.
Conclusions
1
A series of samples (1 ꢀ x)CeO
2
$xNiO were prepared by a
hydrothermal method combined with a subsequent high- 14 W. Yu, J. Zhu, L. Qi, C. Sun, F. Gao, L. Dong and Y. Chen,
temperature calcination. Calcination of the sample at x ¼ 0.1 in
J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2011, 364, 435–442.
a temperature range from 400 to 700 C is applied to tune the 15 B. Solsona, P. Concepci ´o n, S. Hern ´a ndez, B. Demicol and
ꢁ
2
+
distribution of Ni ions in internal lattice and surface segre-
J. M. L. Nieto, Catal. Today, 2012, 180, 51–58.
2
+
gation. Depending on the distributions of Ni , the calcined 16 D. Li, S. Sakai, Y. Nakagawa and K. Tomishige, Phys. Chem.
samples showed the different catalytic activities towards CO
Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 9204–9213.
17 Z. Gu, K. Li, H. Wang, Y. Wei, D. Yan and T. Qiao, Kinet.
Catal., 2013, 54, 326–333.
oxidation. The sample aer calcination of x ¼ 0.1 at 500 ꢁ
C
yielded the optimum catalytic activities towards CO oxidation
and CH
ration of more Ni in CeO
oxygen vacancies, and the associated adsorption/desorption 19 A. Kitla, O. V. Safonova and K. Fottinger, Catal. Lett., 2013,
abilities of surface oxygen species. High temperature calcina-
143, 517–530.
4
oxidation, which is the consequence of the incorpo- 18 G. Zhou, H. Lan, X. Yang, Q. Du, H. Xie and M. Fu, Ceram.
2
+
2
lattice, high concentration of
Int., 2013, 39, 3677–3683.
tion may damage the solid solution structure, by showing 20 W. Shan, M. Luo and C. Li, Appl. Catal., A, 2003, 246, 1–9.
aggregation of surface NiO nanoparticles and the decreased 21 H. Zhou, P. Hu, Z. Huang, F. Qin, W. Shen and H. Xu, Ind.
adsorption/desorption abilities of surface oxygen species. The
Eng. Chem. Res., 2013, 52, 4504–4509.
ndings reported in this work are fundamentally important, 22 W. Fang, C. Pirez, M. Capron, S. Paul, T. Raja, P. L. Dhepe,
which may help to nd more advanced catalytic materials for
technological applications.
F. Dumeignil and L. Jalowiecki-Duhamel, RSC Adv., 2012,
2, 9626.
2
2
3 N. M. Deraz, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2012, 95, 56–60.
4 C. Xian, S. Wang, C. Sun, H. Li, S. Chan and L. Chen, Chin. J.
Catal., 2013, 34, 305–312.
Acknowledgements
This work was nancially supported by NSFC (21025104 and 25 J. Xu, B. Xue, Y.-M. Liu, Y.-X. Li, Y. Cao and K. N. Fan, Appl.
2
2
1271171), and NBRP of China (no. 2011CBA00501 and
013CB632405).
Catal., A, 2011, 405, 142–148.
26 V. Gonzalezdelacruz, J. Holgado, R. Pereniguez and
A. Caballero, J. Catal., 2008, 257, 307–314.
2
7 S.-C. Baek, J.-W. Bae, J. Y. Cheon, K.-W. Jun and K.-Y. Lee,
Catal. Lett., 2010, 141, 224–234.
Notes and references
1
2
3
4
J.-H. Park, J. H. Cho, K. H. Cho, T. W. Lee, H. S. Han and 28 X. Zhang, A. Gu, G. Wang, B. Fang, Q. Yan, J. Zhu, T. Sun,
C.-H. Shin, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2012, 29, 1151–1157.
J. Ma and H. H. Hng, Cryst. Eng., 2011, 13, 188.
S. Pongstabodee, S. Monyanon and A. Luengnaruemitchai, 29 G. Wrobel, M. P. Sohier, A. Dhuysser, J. P. Bonnelle and
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 4749–4761. J. P. Marcq, Appl. Catal., A, 1993, 101, 73–93.
V. M. Shinde and G. Madras, Appl. Catal., B, 2013, 138–139, 30 M. Zhao, G. Li, J. Zheng, L. Li, H. Wang and L. Yang, Cryst.
1–61. Eng., 2011, 13, 6251.
H. Noei, L. Jin, H. Qiu, M. Xu, Y. Gao, J. Zhao, M. Kauer, 31 J.-G. Li, T. Ikegami, Y. Wang and T. Mori, J. Solid State Chem.,
5
C. W ¨o ll, M. Muhler and Y. Wang, Phys. Status Solidi B,
013, 250, 1204–1221.
2002, 168, 52–59.
32 X. D. Zhou and W. Huebner, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2001, 79, 3512.
2
5
G. Jiaxiu, S. Zhonghua, W. Dongdong, Y. Huaqiang, 33 A. Thurber, K. Reddy, V. Shutthanandan, M. Engelhard,
G. Maochu and C. Yaoqiang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2013, 273,
27–535.
C. Wang, J. Hays and A. Punnoose, Phys. Rev. B: Condens.
Matter Mater. Phys., 2007, 76, 165206.
5
6
7
S. Mahammadunnisa, P. Manoj Kumar Reddy, N. Lingaiah 34 M. Zhao, G. Li, L. Li, L. Yang and J. Zheng, Cryst. Growth Des.,
and C. Subrahmanyam, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3, 730. 2012, 12, 3983–3991.
L.-J. Chen, Y. Tang, L. Cui, C. Ouyang and S. Shi, J. Power 35 J.-G Li, T. Ikegami and J.-H. Lee, Acta Mater., 2001, 49, 419–
Sources, 2013, 234, 69–81. 426.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 6397–6406 | 6405