G Model
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2
F.C. Calaza et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
leading to ketone have been of intense interest and are still a matter
of debate [10–12]. Clarification of acetate and its role as spectator,
intermediate or deactivator can be aided by model studies aimed
at identifying the temperature evolution of adsorbed acetic acid.
Identification of surface intermediates by IR methods during C2
reactions requires better identification of possible reaction inter-
mediates by their spectroscopic signature. First principles density
functional theory (DFT) calculations now make it possible to exam-
ine bonding configurations of surface intermediates in detail when
combined with surface science techniques. Comparisons of vibra-
tional spectra simulated using DFT calculations with experimental
FTIR spectra obtained for formate, carbonates and acetaldehyde
have clarified the interpretation of the experimental spectra, which
enables more reliable detection of the surface species [7,13,14].
To obtain a better understanding of the interactions between
acetic acid and cerium oxide catalysts, we have now combined UHV
based measurements on a model CeO2(1 1 1) surface with DFT com-
putations. Surface science measurements, performed as a function
of temperature on a surface with known structure, provide infor-
mation about the evolution of the acetic acid on the surface and
provide signatures of bonding configurations. DFT is used to pre-
dict models for the surface bonding configurations and to simulate
vibrational spectra that can be compared directly with experimen-
tal RAIRS spectra. From this we have identified the stages of acetic
acid deprotonation and decomposition. Measurements are per-
formed upon both oxidized and reduced surfaces to identify the
important role of oxygen vacancies upon the reaction products.
From these studies, we find that bridge bonded acetate coexists
with another type of acetate that is bonded by its interaction with
oxygen vacancies.
(m/z = 45 and 43), CO (m/z = 28) and CO2 (m/z = 44). In the TPD spec-
tra shown and in their peak integration, interferences from overlap-
ping co-products were subtracted. Various other possible products
were monitored but were not definitively detected, including
methane, formaldehyde, dimethyl ether and diethyl ether, vinyl
acetate, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, and various alcohols.
RAIRS was performed as described previously [7]. Spectra were
collected using grazing angle (∼86◦) p-polarized light from the IR
beam of a Mattson Infinity infrared spectrometer, and the reflected
IR beam was detected with a liquid-nitrogen cooled MCT detec-
tor. All spectra shown are differences between the IR absorption
spectrum at a certain condition and a reference spectrum recorded
for the clean ceria surface. All spectra were collected at an instru-
mental resolution of 4 cm−1 and the signal averaged for 1024
scans.
Soft X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (sXPS) was conducted
using synchrotron radiation on beamline U12a at the National Syn-
chrotron Light Source (NSLS). The XPS data were collected using
a VSW 125 hemispherical analyzer with the sample oriented such
that the photon incident angle was 35◦ and electron emission angle
was 30◦ relative to the surface normal. C 1s and O 1s spectra were
recorded using photon energies of 400 and 600 eV, respectively.
The instrumental resolution was ca. 0.5 eV. The Ce 4d photoemi-
ssion was used for binding energy calibration using the 122.3 eV
satellite feature. The Ce oxidation state was determined using XPS
of the Ce 4d regions at Beamline U12a.
NEXAFS was performed at the C k-edge. The energy resolution
was less than 0.5 eV and the photon energy was calibrated using
the dip in the photon flux at 284.7 eV [18]. The X-ray absorption
was recorded using a partial yield electron detector. The high-pass
retarding grid was set at −230 V. Higher order X-ray excitation cre-
ated apparent absorption features from the ceria substrate due to
the O k-edge and the Ce MIV and MV edges. The absorption due to
only higher order radiation was determined by recording spectra
with a retarding grid voltage of −307 V, i.e. greater than the first-
order photon energy. The background resulting from the higher
order excitation was subtracted from the NEXAFS spectra.
2. Experimental and computational methods
Experiments were performed in three separate ultra-high
vacuum chambers described previously, one used for reflection
absorption infra-red spectroscopy (RAIRS) [7], one based at the
National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) for soft X-ray photo-
electron spectroscopy (sXPS) and near edge X-ray absorption fine
grammed desorption (TPD). In each of the UHV systems the model
CeO2 catalyst were prepared as thin films deposited on Ru(0 0 0 1)
single crystals, leading to a flat CeO2 surface with (1 1 1) orienta-
tion [15]. Briefly, cerium metal is evaporated from a metal doser
onto the Ru crystal held at 700 K while under a controlled pressure
of oxygen gas, typically around 10−7 torr. By varying the oxygen
pressure, a range of catalyst with different ratios of Ce3+/Ce4+
could be obtained, as quantified from the XPS spectra (Supplemen-
tal information, Fig. S1). Reduced surfaces could also be obtained
by exposure to methanol at ∼700 K [16]. Glacial acetic acid was
degassed by several freeze–pump–thaw cycles and dosed onto the
surface through either a directed, effusive gas doser or a leak valve.
Temperature programmed desorption (TPD) experiments were
performed using a temperature ramp rate of 2 K/s while biasing the
sample at −70 V to prevent electrons generated by the mass spec-
trometer ionizer from stimulating reactions at the surface. For the
TPD spectra, the prepared surfaces were exposed to acetic acid from
a directed doser at 175–185 K, chosen to be slightly higher than the
multilayer desorption temperature. Following dosing, the sample
HAL/3F 301) and the QMS signal at multiple masses was monitored
during the temperature ramp. The intensities of the observed prod-
ucts were scaled according to the method described by Ko et al.
[17]. The masses used and the product that they most represent
are H2 (m/z = 2), water (m/z = 18), acetylene (m/z = 26), acetaldehyde
(m/z = 29), ketene (m/z = 42), acetone (m/z = 43 and 58), acetic acid
using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) [20–22]. DFT
at the GGA level fails to properly describe the localization of the Ce
4f electrons that occurs with the reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+ due to
self-interaction errors [23]. To compensate for this deficiency, the
ad hoc method that directly modifies the on-site Coulomb interac-
tion, which has been shown to satisfactorily reproduce localized f
states in bulk Ce2O3 and in oxygen vacancies in CeO2, although no
all properties of bulk CeO2 and Ce2O3 [25,26]. A U-value of 2 was
used in this study based on our previous results in modeling the
adsorption of formate and acetaldehyde on CeO2(1 1 1) [7,14].
The core electrons were described by the projector-augmented
wave method (PAW) [27], and the Kohn–Sham valence states
(including Ce(4f5d6s), O(2s2p), C(2s2p), H(1s)) were expanded in
a plane wave basis up to a kinetic energy of 400 eV. The CeO2(1 1 1)
surface was represented by a slab consisting of three O Ce O tri-
layers with a (2 × 2) surface unit cells, which corresponds to ¼
monolayer (ML) of coverage for each adsorbate per unit cell.
The periodic slabs were separated in the z direction by ca.
˚
12 A of vacuum. The top trilayer and all adsorbates were fully
relaxed and the remaining two trilayers were held fixed at the
bulk positions. Adsorption was allowed on one side of the slab
only, with dipole decoupling [28] in the z direction. The surface
Brillouin zone was sampled with a 2 × 2 × 1 Monkhorst–Pack k-
point grid [29]. Geometry optimization was converged to below
0.01 eV/Å in each degree of freedom for all relaxed atoms. Different
Please cite this article in press as: F.C. Calaza, et al., Reactivity and reaction intermediates for acetic acid adsorbed on CeO2(1 1 1), Catal.