Communication
pincer-Fe catalyst had excellent activity at 408C in the pres-
ence of trialkylamines with a TON of up to 100000, but the
catalytic conversion was extremely diminished under base-free
[
11d]
conditions.
from formic acid using bifunctional [Cp*Ir] catalysts (Cp*=
,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) at ambient tempera-
Herein, we report concise hydrogen generation
1
ture without base additives.
We initially investigated the catalytic performance of
a newly synthesized amidoiridium complex (1a) derived from
(
S,S)-TfDPEN (Tf=trifluoromethanesulfonyl) in formic acid/tri-
ethylamine azeotrope (1 mL) at 358C. In the presence of aceto-
phenone (2m) with a substrate/catalyst ratio of 200, transfer
hydrogenation proceeded smoothly to give (S)-1-phenyletha-
nol in 95% yield with 93% ee after 24 h in preference to hydro-
gen formation. In contrast, continuous gas evolution was ob-
served when the azeotrope was introduced into a solution of
Figure 2. Bifunctional amido and amine complexes used for hydrogen gen-
eration from formic acid.
Table 1. Comparison of the catalytic activity in the dehydrogenation of
formic acid.
1
a without the hydrogen acceptor, acetophenone, by a syringe
À1
pump at a rate of 0.3 mLmin . Formic acid was degraded to
hydrogen and carbon dioxide without contamination of
carbon monoxide, and the TON was determined as 33 after 1 h
by monitoring the amount of gaseous products with a flowme-
ter. The Ir–TfDPEN catalyst proved effective in the absence of
triethylamine, leading to a TON of up to 255 in 1,2-dimethoxy-
ethane (DME), unlike with most catalytic hydrogen generation
systems, in which amine additives or basic salts are required (A
in Figure 1). Further acceleration was observed by the addition
À1
[f]
Entry
1
Catalyst
TOF5 min [h
]
TON1 h
Yield [%]
1a
4990
0
1910
0
509
144
70
53
0
0
2570
240 (6780)
72
0
19
5
3
2
[a]
2
[
[IrCl(m-Cl)Cp*]
2
1b
1c
1d
3
4
1a
1a
2
a]
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1720
1610
824
616
0
0
4110
48
[a]
0
0
[b,c]
32
[
b,d]
[e]
[e]
0
3 (85)
[
a] HCOONa (265 equiv/Ir) was added. [b] The reaction was conducted
with formic acid (3.0 mL, 79.5 mmol) and catalyst 1a (0.01 mmol) in DME
6 mL) and H O (6 mL). [c] At 358C or [d] at 08C. [e] The highest TON and
(
2
yield after 53 h in parenthesis. [f] The hydrogen yield based on formic
acid.
Cl)Cp*] , the chloroiridium complex (2), as a precursor of 1a,
2
promoted the hydrogen evolution in the presence of sodium
formate (265 equiv/Ir; see the Supporting Information) with
a TON of 509 (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). The positive effects of
the electron-deficient substituents on the sulfonyl group, such
as TfDPEN and p-CF C H SO DPEN, were confirmed in compari-
3
6
4
2
Figure 1. Time vs TON plots for the catalytic hydrogen generation from
formic acid (3.0 mL, 79.5 mmol) using 1a (0.03 mmol) at 358C in DME or in
a 1:1 mixture of DME and H O. The plots are the mean value of three meas-
2
son with the related amido–Ir complexes bearing widely used
MsDPEN (Ms=CH SO ) and TsDPEN (Ts=p-CH C H SO ) ligands
3
2
3
6
4
2
(
entries 1, 4–6). The [Cp*Rh] and [(p-cymeme)Ru] variants (3
urements and are displayed with error bars (~: A; *: B).
and 4) are characterized by a loss of the catalytic function
under the same conditions (entries 7 and 8). The preferable
catalyst 1a was allowed to reduce its loading amount to 1.0
of water, whereas the reaction conducted in only water result-
ed in a lower catalytic performance, possibly due to the limited
solubility of 1a (see Supporting Information). A TON of 1910
À2
10 mmol (i.e., corresponding to a formic acid/Ir ratio of 7950)
and led to a TON of 2570 after 1 h at 358C (entry 9). Notably,
hydrogen was continuously produced even at a lower temper-
ature of 08C, and the highest TON of 6780 was achieved with
a prolonged reaction time of 53 h (entry 10).
À1
after 1 h and a TOF of 4990 h during the initial 5 min were
attained in a 1:1 mixed solvent of DME and water (B in
Figure 1).
Hydrogen generation was performed with a family of Ir, Rh,
In separate NMR experiments, treatment of the amido com-
À2
and Ru complexes (depicted in Figure 2; 3.010 mmol) in
plex 1a with 5.3 equivalents of formic acid in [D ]THF at
8
DME (3 mL) and water (3 mL) at 358C for 1 h with continuous
injection of HCOOH (3 mL, 79.5 mmol) for the initial 10 min.
The results in Table 1 indicate that the DPEN ligand is vital for
hydrogen formation from formic acid, as with the transfer hy-
drogenation. Although no reaction proceeded with [IrCl(m-
À808C resulted in addition across the amido–Ir bond to gener-
ate a formato(amine) complex displaying a formyl signal at d=
[
13]
8.73 ppm. The following decarboxylation took place above
À308C to afford the corresponding hydrido(amine) complex
5a, quantitatively, which is supported by the characteristic hy-
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 13513 – 13517
13514
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim