3
26
MATYSHAK et al.
explained by the scheme given below. The scheme
takes into account that an acetate complex is obtained
from an ethoxy group. In turn, the acetate complex
can be decomposed with the release of methane and
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The work was supported by the Russian Founda-
tion for Basic Research, grant no. 18-03-00627А.
CO , and it can also be converted into formiate and its
2
coproduct ethylene:
REFERENCES
1
2
3
4
. Tret’yakov, V.F., Tret’yakov, K.V., Nhu, C.T.Q.,
Sil’chenkova, O.N., and Matyshak, V.A., Rus. J. Phys.
Chem. A, 2013, vol. 87, no. 6, p. 941.
. Chistyakov, A.V., Zharova, P.A., Tsodikov, M.V.,
Nikolaev, S.A., Krotova, I.N., and Ezzhelenko, D.I.,
Kinet. Catal., 2016, vol. 57, no. 6, p. 803.
. De Lima, S.M., da Cruz, I.O., Jacobs, G., Davis, B.H.,
Mattos, L.V., and Noronha, F.B., J. Catal., 2008,
vol. 257, p. 356.
. Navarro, R.M., Alvarez-Galvan, M.C., Sanchez-San-
chez, M.C., Rosa, F., and Fierro, J.L.G., Appl. Catal.,
B, 2005, vol. 55, p. 229.
CH −CH −OZ + ZO + Z → CH −COOZ + 2ZH,(6)
3
2
3
CH −COOZ + ZH → CH +CO + 2Z,
(7)
(8)
3
4
2
CH −COOZ + Z → HCOOZ + CH Z,
3
2
2
CH Z → C H + 2Z,
(9)
2
2
4
HCOОZ + ZO→ ZCO + ZH,
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
3
HCOOZ → CO2(g) + ZH,
ZCO → CO + ZO,
3
2(g)
H O + 2Z → ZOH + ZH,
2
(g)
5. Salge, J.R., Deluga, G.A., and Schmidt, L.D., J.
ZH + ZO → ZOH + Z,
ZH + ZH → H2(g) + 2Z.
Catal., 2005, vol. 235, p. 69.
6. Scott, M., Goeffroy, M., Chiu, W., and Blackford, M.A.,
Top. Catal., 2008, vol. 51, p. 13.
The scheme takes into account two possible routes
of the consumption of the formiates. The first is asso-
ciated with the formation of carbonate complexes on
the surface (stage 10). It is obvious that as the tempera-
ture increases the carbonates decompose releasing
7. Mattos, L.V. and Nornha, F.B., J. Catal., 2005,
vol. 233, p. 453.
8. Mattos, L.V. and Nornha, F.B., J. Power Sources, 2005,
vol. 145, p. 10.
9. Roh, H., Wang, Y., King, D.L., Platon, A., and Chin,
CO (stage 12).
Y., Catal. Lett., 2006, vol. 108, p. 15.
2
1
0. Romero-Sarria, F., Vargas, J.C., Roger, A., and
The second route of the consumption of the formi-
Kiennemann, A., Catal. Today, 2008, vol. 133 P. 149.
ates includes their decomposition with the formation
1
1. Sheng, P.-Y., Yee, F., Bowneker, G.A., and Iddris, H.,
of CO and hydrogen in the gas phase (stage 6). This is
2
J. Catal., 2002, vol. 208, p. 393.
confirmed by the fact that the simultaneous appear-
1
2. Cavallaro, S., Chiodo, V., Freni, S., Mondello, N., and
ance of CO and hydrogen in the gas phase coincides
2
Frusteri, F., Appl. Catal., A, 2003, vol. 249, p. 155.
in terms of the temperature with a decrease in the for-
mate concentration on the surface (Figs. 2a, 2b).
Hydrogen is formed by a recombination of the hydro-
gen atoms, which in turn are formed at the conversion
stages of the surface complexes (stage 10).
1
3. Wanat, E.C., Venkataraman, K., and Schmidt, L.D.,
Appl. Catal., A, 2004, vol. 276, p. 155.
1
4. Haryanto, A., Fernando, S., Murali, N., and Adhikari, S.,
Energy Fuels, 2005, vol. 19, p. 20098.
1
5. Yee, A., Morrison, S.J., and Idriss, H., J. Catal., 1999,
From the view point of the surface compounds, the
main difference between the decomposition reactions
of ethanol and methanol [24] on the same catalyst lies
in the significant concentration of acetate complexes
in the case of ethanol. It appears that their conversion
plays a key role in the formation of products.
vol. 186, p. 279.
1
6. Guil, J.M., Homs, N., Llorca, J., and Ramirez de la
Piscina, P., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, vol. 109, p. 10813.
1
7. Erdohelyi, A., Rasko, J., Kecskes, T, Toth, M.,
Domok, M., and Baan, K., Catal. Today, 2006,
vol. 116, p. 367.
1
8. Sheng, P.-Y., Bowneker, G.A., and Iddris, H., Appl.
Catal., A, 2004, vol. 261, p. 171.
CONCLUSIONS
1
9. Akdim, O., Kai, W., Fierro, V., Provendier, H., van
Using IR spectroscopy in situ, we showed that the
ethoxy groups, acetate and formiate complexes, and
the consolidation products play a key role in the con-
Veen, A., Shen, W., and Mirodatos, C., Top. Catal.,
2008, vol. 51, p. 22.
2
0. De Lima, S.M., Silva, A.M., Graham, U.M., Jacobs, G.,
Davis, B.H., Mattos, L.V., and Noronha, F.B., Appl.
Catal., A, 2009, vol. 352, p. 95.
version of ethanol on the surface of a 5%Cu/CeO cat-
2
alyst. Acetaldehyde is formed due to the interaction of
the ethoxy and hydroxyl surface groups. The forma- 21. Madix, R. J., Adv. Catal., 1982, vol. 29, p. 1.
tion of acetone, croton aldehyde, and butadiene is
associated with the decomposition of the consolida-
tion products. The formation of hydrogen, CO, and
22. Vohs, J. M. and Barteau, M. A., Surf. Sci., 1986,
vol. 176, p. 91.
2
3. Idriss, H., Diagne, C., Hindermann, J.P.,
Kiennemann, A., and Barteau, M.A., J. Catal., 1995,
vol. 155, p. 219.
CO is based on the conversion of a high-temperature
2
formiate surface complex.
KINETICS AND CATALYSIS
Vol. 59
No. 3
2018