328
MOTA ET AL.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The main objective of this study was to develop a vana-
dium phosphorus oxide catalyst able to work under fuel-
rich conditions for nC4 mild oxidation. This study has
demonstrated that doping with Co or Mo leads to such
a promoting effect. We have observed that the nature of
the doping element is more important than its way of in-
troduction in the V–P–O catalyst. Co as dopant has more
oxidizing power on the V–P–O system than Mo: it favors a
higher V5+/V4+ ratio under fuel-rich oxidation conditions,
limits the C deposition, and makes possible the production
of maleic anhydride on this modified V–P–O system.
This study opens a new route for the development of
a new type of reactor based on a ceramic porous tubu-
lar membrane for which the chemical composition of the
V–P–O catalyst will be adjusted to be adapted to reducing
nC4/O2 catalytic conditions at the inlet of the membrane
reactor. Indeed, besides the choice of a proper membrane,
membrane reactors may also need a specifically designed
catalyst adapted to their catalysis conditions (22). Studies
are underway for optimization of these systems and espe-
cially to define the best method for dopant introduction.
FIG. 9. Correlation between MA intrinsic activity and XPS results.
is observed for doping at the higher level Mo/V = 2.56%
as compared to Co/V = 0.77% . The catalysts are, however,
much less active. The differences observed can be explained
by the different methods of preparation. As a matter of
fact, Co dopant has been dispersed in the V–P–O matrix
at the stage of the preparation of the corresponding pre-
cursor in organic medium. The different method of dop-
ing of the VOHPO4, 0.5H2O precursor by impregnation by
the Mo heptamolybdate solution should explain the dif-
ference observed between the Mo- and Co-doped VPD
catalysts.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was conducted in the framework of the Contract Brite
BRPR-CT955-0046. The authors are indebted to the support of the Eu-
ropean Community. We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Khadija Aı¨t Lachgar
for her help in the preparation of one V–P–O precursor, Dr. P. Deliche`re
31
and M. Brun for XPS analysis, M.C. Durupty for P NMR, and V. Martin
for SEM and EDX examination of the catalysts.
In a previous publication (21), we established a corre-
lation for a series of doped and undoped V–P–O catalysts
between the MA intrinsic activity and the contribution of
the V4+–V5+ dimers (measured by 31P NMR by spin echo
mapping in the 200–1500 ppm range) for n-butane oxida-
tion under fuel-lean conditions (nC4/O2/He = 1.5/18.5/80,
T = 430 C, GSHV = 1000 h 1). It was observed by 31P NMR
(compare Figs. 7 and 8) that most of the V5+ species (bulk
as identified by this technique) are consumed under n-
butane fuel-rich oxidation conditions, but that a slight con-
tribution of these species was still present. XPS was used
to detect these species and to make correlations with the
catalytic results. A correlation is observed, Fig. 9, for the
catalysts of the two series and VPD between the maleic
anhydride intrinsic activity, IAMA (see Table 2) and the
surface V5+ species (measured by % V5+ VXPS). It should
thus be concluded that for nC4 oxidation under fuel-rich
conditions, the MA production depends on the superficial
REFERENCES
1. Hodnett, B. K., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 27, 373 (1985).
2. Centi, G., Trifiro, F., Ebner, J. B., and Franchetti, V. M., Chem. Rev.
88, 55 (1988).
3. Cavani, F., and Trifiro, F., Catalysis 11, 246 (1994).
4. Duvauchelle, N., and Bordes, E., Catal. Lett. 57, 81 (1999).
5. Ellison, I. J., Hutchings, G. J., Sanane´s, M. T., and Volta, J. C., J. Chem.
Soc. Chem. Commun., 1093 (1994).
6. Abon, M., Be´re´, K. E., Tuel, A., and Deliche`re, P., J. Catal. 156, 28
(1995).
7. A¨ıt Lachgar, K., Abon, M., and Volta, J. C., J. Catal. 171, 383 (1997).
8. A¨ıt Lachgar, K., Tuel, A., Brun, M., Herrmann, J. C., Kraft, J. M.,
Martin, J. R., Volta, J. C., and Abon, M., J. Catal. 177, 224 (1998).
9. Volta, J. C., Be´re´, K. E., Zhang, Y. J., and Olier, R., in “ACS Symposium
Series, 523” (S. T. Oyama and J. W. Hightower, Eds.), p. 217. Am.
Chem. Soc., Washington, DC, 1993.
10. Contractor, R. M., Bergna, H. E., Chowdry, U., and Sleight, A. W., in
“Fluidization VI” (J. R. Grace, L. W. Shemilf, and M. A. Bergougnou,
Eds.), p. 589. Engineering Foundation, New York, 1989.
density of V5+ sites which should be restricted to the sur- 11. Contractor, R. M., Garnett, D. I., Horowitz, H. S., Bergna, H. E.,
face. It appears clearly that the higher the V5+/V4+ XPS
Patience, G. S., Schwartz, J. T., and Sisler, G. M., in “New Develop-
ments in Selective Oxidation II” (V. Corte´s Corberan and S. Bellon,
Eds.), p. 233, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994.
ratio, the lower the carbon deposition. For the unpromoted
VPD, the V5+ species are reduced, leading to dehydrogena-
12. Centi, G., Fornasari, G., and Trifiro, F., J. Catal. 89, 44 (1984).
tion reaction, originating the formation of carbonaceous
species.
13. Centi, G., Fornasari, G., and Trifiro, F., Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res.
Dev. 24, 32 (1985).