D128
Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 149 ͑9͒ D125-D131 ͑2002͒
Reactor setup and heating.—Solid, granular sodium salts were
placed in the alumina crucible and tube. The electrodes were in-
serted into the top of the reactor and lowered above the melt. The
loaded alumina crucible was positioned in the bottom of the reactor,
the lower part of the reactor was raised into place, and the flange
was closed. The ceramic purge port was secured 20-30 cm above the
material in the crucible while the sheathed thermocouple was posi-
tioned 1 cm from the bottom of the melt crucible. The system
was purged with argon ͑0.5-1.2 LSTP /min for the outer system,
0
.05-0.15 LSTP /min for the tube͒ for 3 h before heating. The elec-
Ϫ1
trochemical cell was heated at approximately 100°C h to the op-
erating temperature (Ϯ5°C).
Electrolysis experiments.—During the electrolysis experiments
the following quantities were measured: time (Ϯ60 s), temperature
of the molten salt at a distance approximately 3 cm away from the
electrodes, the current and voltage applied to the cell, and the rel-
evant volume percentages of product gas. The number of coulombs
transferred during the experiment was determined by integrating the
current data (Ϯ0.003 A) with time. The IR-compensation of the
voltage was determined by current interrupt.
Figure 5. Gas evolution data as a function of time for an electrolysis experi-
ment of sodium carbonate, sodium sulfide, and sodium sulfate in a divided
melt and common atmosphere at 820°C.
tation, but suffered from sulfide oxidation by oxygen to produce
sulfate ͑Eq. 17͒ and less than 10% current efficiencies for oxide
production ͑Eq. 19͒. Cyclic voltammetry confirmed that the cathodic
products were oxidized at the anode. In the experiments described
below, deviations from stoichiometric current for the desired reac-
tions ͑Eq. 9 through 12͒ are explained by the participation of sulfide
and polysulfide in a current shuttle between the electrodes ͑Eq. 14
through 16͒, while oxidation of oxide resulted in oxygen gas ͑Eq.
Gas analysis.—Purging the electrochemical cell, either as a
whole or by compartment, assisted the removal of gases produced
during electrolysis. Both the inlet and the outlet flow rates were
measured; deviations between the two were significant due system
resistance. The outlet flow rate closest to the gas analyzers was used
to calculate the rate of gas being produced by the electrolysis.
Carbon monoxide (Ϯ0.005%) and carbon dioxide (Ϯ0.01%)
were measured in percent volume by an infrared analyzer ͑IR-702
gas analyzer, Infrared Industries Inc., Santa Barbara, CA͒. Oxygen
13͒ whose fate was to leave the system or oxidize sulfide to sulfate
͑Eq. 17͒. The IR-corrected cell potentials for the experiments were
(
Ϯ0.01%) was measured in percent volume by an electrochemical
typically 2.5 to 3 V.
cell analyzer ͑model 8000, Illinois Instruments, Johnsburg, IL͒. The
Sulfur species were not detected in the atmosphere by either gas
chromatography analysis of the vapor phase or ICP analysis of hy-
drogen peroxide solutions through which the effluent was bubbled.
This supports the proposition that sulfate oxidation ͑Eq. 18͒ was not
an electrochemical reaction occurring at the anodic potential limit.
Electrolysis of molten paper pulping chemicals ͑850-900°C͒ was
performed in melts where (i) the anolyte and catholyte molten salts
were separated but their atmospheres were not and (ii) both the melt
and the atmospheres were separated. Sodium carbonate, sodium sul-
fide, and sodium sulfate comprised the initial mixture for the system
without the divided atmosphere ͑Fig. 4A͒. To verify sulfate reduc-
tion to sulfide and oxide, the second experimental configuration was
utilized to divide the melt and the atmosphere while the cell was
loaded with carbonate and sulfate of sodium ͑Fig. 4B͒.
oxygen analyzer was prone to deviations at flow rates below 0.5 L
min . The analyzers were calibrated with gases of known concen-
Ϫ1
trations ͑Holox, Atlanta, GA͒ of the range being measured. The
outlet flow rate was measured with a bubble flow meter (Ϯ1 mL)
and a stopwatch (Ϯ0.01 s).
The stoichiometric rate of carbon dioxide and oxygen evolution
at any current was calculated according to Eq. 5 and Faraday’s law.
Both actual and stoichiometric rates of gas evolution are presented
on the same graph ͑Fig. 3 and 5͒, allowing a comparison of the
actual gas evolution to the theoretical rates based upon coulometry.
Postelectrolysis chemical analysis.—After the electrolysis ex-
periments the reactor was cooled and the inorganic chemicals were
dissolved in a known mass of deionized water. Standard analytical
techniques used in the pulp and paper industry were applied to de-
termine the chemical composition. Analysis was performed as soon
as possible to minimize atmospheric oxidizing and carbonating of
Divided melt and undivided atmosphere.—Figure 5 shows the
time variation of the measured carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide,
and oxygen for the duration of an electrolysis experiment at 820
Ϯ 10°C of a mixture containing sodium carbonate, sodium sulfide,
and sodium sulfate ͑1:0.25:0.25 mol ratio, column 1, Table I͒. A
total of 26,766 Ϯ 918 C were transferred, equating to a 15.4
Ϯ 0.5% ͑extent of conversion͒ conversion of carbonate loaded into
the cell based upon carbonate oxidation.
the solutions. A three-step acid titration based upon the standard
TAPPI method T-5869 ͑ABC titration,1 Mettler DL70ES titrator,
Schwerzenbach, Switzerland͒ determined the concentrations of so-
dium hydroxide, sodium sulfide, and sodium sulfate. Sodium hy-
droxide was formed from the reaction of sodium oxide with water
͑
Eq. 1͒; this assumption was used when reporting sodium oxide
In Fig. 5, gas evolution increased proportionally to the applied
current, which is also calculated as the expected rate of production
through the stoichiometry of Eq. 5. The gas production dropped off
after 23000 s. when the current was turned off. It began to rise again
at 25000 s. after the current was turned back on. This verifies that
gas production is due to the applied current. Although neither the
carbon dioxide nor oxygen reached the stoichiometric amount for
carbonate oxidation, the oxygen approaches stoichiometry closer
than carbon dioxide. This is interpreted as additional oxygen gen-
eration from oxidation of oxide. Although oxide was not initially
loaded into the melt, it appears in the anode chamber by thermal
decomposition of sodium carbonate
values from aqueous analysis. Capillary ion electrophoresis ͑CIE,
Waters capillary ion analyzer, Milford, MA͒10 determined the con-
centration of carbonate and sulfate in solution. Inductively coupled
plasma analysis ͑ICP, Perkin Elmer Optima 3000DV, Wellesley,
MA͒ determined the metal contents of the solution and provided
verification for the sulfur balance in the melt, as well as a check on
the ABC titration ͑ABC͒ and CIE. The analysis is reported in moles
for comparison to the initial moles loaded into the cell. All analyses
have an uncertainty of р10%.
1
0
Results and Discussion
Cell arrangement and design is important in the electrolysis ex-
periments. Initial investigations operated in an undivided cell orien-
Ϫ8
Na CO ↔ Na O ϩ CO K900°C ϭ 7.23 • 10
͓21͔
2
3
2
2