82
F. Eigenmann et al. / Thermochimica Acta 440 (2006) 81–92
concentrations. Therefore, several expensive gas standards and
an accurate flow control are required to obtain reliable values
of concentrations in the FTIR gas cell. Moreover, due to the
influence of several experimental parameters on the intensity
of FTIR signal (as e.g. change of the baseline), the calibration
has to be frequently repeated. In order to avoid these prob-
lems, pulse calibration techniques were investigated by de la
Guardia and co-workers [15,16]. They developed a direct and
simultaneous application to quantify different fluids, e.g. butyl
acetate, toluene and methyl ethyl ketone based on the use of
vapor phase FTIR measurements. However, these experiments
were only carried out with FTIR spectrometer without cou-
pling it to the thermoanalyzer. First quantification of evolved
gases based on the pulse technique combined with TG systems
was performed by Maciejewski et al. [12,13]. Quantification
of the FTIR signals in the FTIR-TG system was targeted by
posing a known amount of solids with known stoichiometry
of the decomposition process and by injection of liquids into
the TA-FTIR system. The extension to FTIR-TA coupled tech-
nique was achieved by Marsanich et al. [18]. They applied also
the gas-pulse calibration using ammonia, carbon monoxide and
carbon dioxide. They introduced the vaporization technique for
calibration of the FTIR signals by liquids samples using the
vaporization technique. The applied procedure enabled indirect
quantification of evolved gases. The injections (calibrations)
were not carried out in situ that is during the same experimental
run in which the decomposition of the investigated samples was
studied.
The opportunity of injecting a known amount of a particular
gas or liquid into the carrier gas stream provides a quanti-
tative calibration by relating the FTIR signal to the injected
quantity of probe species. A linear relation between spec-
tral absorbance at a given wavenumber and low concentra-
tion of gaseous compounds is postulated by Lambert–Beer’s
law: Aν = c × d × εν, where A is the integral absorbance over
a wavenumber interval ν (cm−1), c the concentration of the
absorbing species (mol l−1), d the optical path length (cm)
and ε the integral molar absorption coefficient (l mol−1 cm−1).
Three different methods of quantifications in coupled TA sys-
by:
liquids and solids. Additionally, the influence of experimental
parameters such as the concentration of the analyzed species,
temperature and flow rate of carrier gas on the FTIR signals
was investigated. Furthermore, the PulseTA® [13] developed
in our group was expanded to new applications, involving liq-
uid components. This new technique, in contrast to the known
vaporization methods, is based on isothermal or non-isothermal
calibration, which allows in situ calibration before the reaction
(decomposition) of the target compound has already started.
2. Experimental
Experiments were carried out on a Netzsch TG 209 and STA
449 analyzer equipped with two pulse devices enabling injection
of a certain amount of one or two different gases or gaseous
mixtures into the carrier gas stream flowing through the system
[13]. The amount of injected gas could be changed from 0.01 to
2.0 ml. Volumes of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 ml were mainly used.
Additionally two heated injection ports were installed before
and after (on the top of) the thermoanalyzer allowing injections
of liquids with a Hamilton syringe CR-700-20. The amount of
injected liquid was usually in the range from 1 to 10 l.
The flow rate was controlled by mass flow controllers,
Brook’s model 5850E, based on a thermal mass flow sensing
technique. A helium (purity 99.999%, PanGas) carrier gas flow
rate of 50 ml min−1 was used. The thermoanalyzer was con-
nected by a heated (ca. 200 ◦C) transfer-line to a Bruker Vector
22 FTIR spectrometer.
The FTIR apparatus is equipped with a MCT detector and
a specifically developed low-volume gas cell (8.7 ml) with a
123 mm path length and ZnSe windows. To avoid condensation
of low volatile compounds the cell was heated to a constant
temperature of 200 ◦C. The whole FTIR compartment was con-
tinuously purged by nitrogen and additionally molecular sieves
were used to minimize the water and carbon dioxide background
in the recorded spectra. The resolution of the collected spectra
was set to 4 cm−1 and co-addition of four scans per spectrum
was applied. As a consequence spectra were recorded with a
temporal resolution of about 6 s, depending on the integration
methods. The IR acquired interferograms constantly during the
time of the test, and the residence time of the injected species in
the gas cell was about 10 s (flow rate: 50 ml min−1). In this way,
the spectra of all gases were averaged, without cutting peaks of
the calibration pulses, which would lower the accuracy of the
quantification of the evolved species.
A) decomposing solids with well-known stoichiometric reac-
tion e.g. calcium carbonate [12,14], calcium oxalate
[12,14,19,20] or sodium bicarbonate [12,19] in TG-MS sys-
tems,
2.1. Pulse calibration
B) injection of a known amount of the calibration compound
alyzer and evolved gas analysis device (MS [12] or FTIR
[17,18]),
C) vaporization of known amounts of liquids in the thermoan-
alyzer itself [18,21].
For the gas injections a home-made device was placed before
the thermoanalyzer. It contains a rotary sample valve enabling a
carrier gas to purge the loop of a given volume, which had been
previously filled with the calibration gas of known composition.
In order to quantify the FTIR signals, pulses of a known volume
were injected before and/or after the decomposition of the inves-
tigated sample. For injections of the liquids another home-made
device consisting of a T-port tube was applied, which allows
quantifying the evolved gases on the same experimental set-up.
In order to extend and validate the opportunities of quantification
ofevolvedgasesinTG-FTIRsystems, wepresenttheresultsofin
situ calibrations applying different techniques and using gases,