264
SLOVETSKII, CHISTOV
films, coke, or soot would be formed on the surfaces of one order of magnitude, as compared with PdRu alloy,
all of the alloys to affect the rate and activation energy or by a factor of more than 2–3, as compared with
of forward reaction (I).
PdNi alloy.
(2) The reaction rate of disproportionation monoꢀ
An analysis of the experimental results and pubꢀ
lished data showed that the reaction rates and activation
energies (Еа) reflect the desorption of CO2 molecules
over the temperature range of CO disproportionation
reaction (573–925 K) on multicomponent (B1–B3)
and twoꢀcomponent membrane Pd–10Ru and
Pd⎯5.5Ni palladium alloys [7]. According to the
above disproportionation mechanism of reactions
(IV)–(XI), these results reflect the temperature distriꢀ
tonically decreased with decreasing temperature on all
of the test multicomponent and twoꢀcomponent
membrane palladium alloys. The change in the activaꢀ
tion energy of the reaction on palladium alloys with
various compositions (Еа = 9–95 kJ/mol) reflects the
shape of the temperature distribution of the concenꢀ
tration of s2 active sites, which depends on the nature
and concentration of alloy elements.
bution of the concentrations of active surface sites (s2
of the strong bridging form of the adsorption of CO
molecules for corresponding alloys [7, 18].
)
(3) The formation of atomic carbon in the reaction
of CO disproportionation on all of the test membrane
palladium alloys other than B3ꢀ2 does not result in the
formation of coke or soot deposits, which can decrease
the rate of reaction at residence times to 200 s and total
exposure times to 12 h, on their surfaces.
(4) On the surface of B3ꢀ2 alloy, atomic carbon
adsorbed as a result of the reaction initiates the formaꢀ
tion of a polymer film, which is weakly bound to the
surface but partially blocks it to cause a monotonic
decrease in the rate of reaction over the residence time
range of 40–200 s by a factor of almost 2. The reaction
rate and activation energy for this alloy were deterꢀ
At gas pressure
p
≥
0.1 MPa, the formation of CO2
resulted from consecutive reactions: dissociative CO
adsorption (VI) with the formation of Оs2 adsorbed
oxygen atoms followed by the oxidation of CO moleꢀ
cules adsorbed at other sites s1 (V) or immediately at
Оs2 atoms (VII). One way or the other, all of these steps
occurred at the active sites of alloy surfaces. At a gas
pressure of 0.1 MPa in the reactor and
flow of CO molecules to the surface of alloy samples
was
1024 molecule cm–2 s–1. Therefore, the adsorpꢀ
Т = 873 K, the
3
×
mined at the CO residence time with the surface
40 s in the absence of a film.
τ
=
tion surface sites s1 and s2 should be completely occuꢀ
pied by CO molecules with the formation of adsorbed
(5) We proposed a reaction mechanism to adeꢀ
quately explain the experimental results.
and
atoms in a time shorter than
'
Сs2
3
10–6 s [23,
×
''
Оs2
24]. From the experimental data, it follows that
''
Оs2
atoms decayed in the reactions of CO2 formation with
a characteristic time of no shorter than 10 s (Fig. 3).
Thus, the oxidation of CO by the interaction with
adsorbed oxygen atoms is the rateꢀlimiting step of the
reaction of CO2 formation. An increase in the reactor
pressure above 0.1 MPa and in the flux of CO moleꢀ
cules to the alloy surfaces cannot affect the rates of CO
oxidation steps and the formation of CO2 molecules
with their desorption into a gas phase because the
REFERENCES
1. Slovetskii, D.I., Drag. Kamni Drag. Met., 2003, no. 1,
p. 119.
2. Knapton, A.G., Platinum Met. Rev., 1977, vol. 21,
p. 44.
3. German Patent 2305595, 1974.
4. Mordkovich, V.Z., Baichtock, Yu.K., and Sosna, M.H.,
Platinum Met. Rev., 1992, vol. 36, p. 90.
purification of sites and the regeneration of s2 active
'
s2
5. Tarasova, V.E. and Pavlova, L.F., in Metally i splavy kak
membrannye katalizatory (Metals and Alloys As Memꢀ
brane Catalysts), Gryaznov, V.M. and Klabunovskii, E.I.,
Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1981, p. 120.
sites occurred only after the formation and desorption
of CO2 and Сn molecules. Consequently, the rate of
CO disproportionation reaction (I) is independent of
gas pressure. The absence of the pressure dependence
of the rate of the reaction was also supported by pubꢀ
lished experimental data [7–9].
6. Roshan, N.R. and Polyakova, V.P., in Metallicheskie
monokristally (Metal Single Crystals), Moscow: Nauka,
1990, p. 235.
7. Gur’yanova, O.S., Serov, Yu.M., Lapidus, A.L., Dmitꢀ
riev, R.G., Gul’yanova, S.G., Gryaznov, V.M., and
Based on the above consideration, we can make the
following conclusions:
Minachev, Kh.M., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim.
,
(1) The specific rate of reaction (wr) of CO disproꢀ
portionation with the formation of CO2 molecules and
1987, no. 11, p. 2428.
8. Gur’yanova, O.S., Serov, Yu.M., Gul’yanova, S.G.,
and Gryaznov, V.M., Kinet. Katal., 1988, vol. 29, no. 4,
p. 850.
adsorbed atomic carbon is independent of the resꢀ
'
Сs2
idence time of CO with the surfaces of all of the test
multicomponent membrane palladium alloys other
9. Gryaznov, V.M., Gul’yanova, S.G., and Serov, Yu.M.,
than B3ꢀ2. At
order B3ꢀ
T = 833–925 K, wr decreases in the
В2 В3ꢀ1 В3ꢀ3 В3ꢀ4
Usp. Khim., 1989, vol. 58, p. 58.
2
10. Koshel’, V.I., Dobradin, A.A., and Chistov, E.M.,
Vestn. Akad. Nauk BSSR, Ser. Fiz. Energ. Nauk, 1983,
no. 2, p. 102.
B1. At the same process parameters, it was lower than
that on twoꢀcomponent membrane alloys: at least by
KINETICS AND CATALYSIS Vol. 51
No. 2
2010