S. Li, C. Lai, C. Li et al.
Journal of Molecular Liquids xxx (xxxx) xxx
such as responsiveness to visible light, a narrow band gap, favor-
able thermal stability, and cost-efficient and straightforward
preparation [30–34]. However, the photocatalytic activity of pris-
tine g-C3N4 is restricted by its small specific surface area (SSA)
and low separation efficiency of photogenerated electron-hole
pairs. Furthermore, its narrow absorption range in the visible
region results in the inadequate utilization of visible light. Thus,
a variety of methods, such as surface modification, precious metal
doping, and heterojunction construction, have been implemented
to improve the photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4 [35–40]. Meso-
porous graphitic carbon nitride (mpg-C3N4) is often prepared via
templating and acid etching of g-C3N4 to enlarge its SSA [41,42].
The combination of BiOBr and g-C3N4 is considered to be a favor-
able heterojunction as these two materials have a well-matched
band, which promotes charge carrier transfer [43–48].
a muffle furnace for 4 h at a heating rate of 2.2 °C/min. After cool-
ing to room temperature, a yellow powder was obtained, which
was then ground, sieved, and stirred in 4 M NH4HF2 at room tem-
perature for 48 h to remove SiO2. Next, the treated powder was
washed with distilled water followed by ethanol and dried at
70 °C overnight to obtain templated g-C3N4.
A certain amount of templated g-C3N4 was stirred for 30 min in
40 ml of 0.5 M nitric acid. Subsequently, the mixture was kept in a
reaction kettle at 160℃ for 6 h. After cooling to room temperature,
the resulting powder was successively washed with distilled water
and ethanol, and dried at 70 °C overnight to afford the acid-etched
product, mpg-C3N4.
2.3. Magnetization of mpg-C3N4
On the other hand, although nanoparticle photocatalysts are
efficient and prolific, their separation from water is challenging,
limiting their practical application. This drawback can be
addressed by magnetizing the nanoparticles. Magnetic nanoparti-
cles can be separated from water using magnetic separation tech-
nology, and reused [49–53]. This approach enables the use of
nanoparticles for water treatment.
In this study, mpg-C3N4 was prepared and subsequently magne-
tized to generate magnetic mpg-C3N4 (MꢁmpgꢁC3N4), which was
used to generate a composite with BiOBr. To expand the absorption
range of visible light and further improve the photocatalytic activ-
ity, polythiophene (PTh), a conductive polymer exhibiting an excel-
lent capacitance performance, good conductivity, and light
absorption over the full wavelength band [54] was doped into
the MꢁmpgꢁC3N4/BiOBr composite. Thus, the MꢁmpgꢁC3N4/
BiOBr/PTh photocatalyst was prepared, and was then used to
degrade DMP under visible light. In this study, MꢁmpgꢁC3N4/
BiOBr/PTh was characterized, and its photocatalytic performance
for the degradation of DMP was investigated. Additionally, the
photocatalytic degradation mechanism was discussed. This study
provides an effective material and method for the removal of
DMP from water.
mpg-C3N4, (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2ꢀ6H2O and NH4Fe(SO4)2ꢀ12H2O were
prepared in a 2.5:1 mass ratio of mpg-C3N4 to theoretically gener-
ated Fe3O4, and a 1:1.43 molar ratio of Fe2+ to Fe3+. NH4Fe(SO4)2-
ꢀ12H2O was dissolved in 75 ml of distilled water and heated to
60℃ in a constant temperature water bath. Meanwhile, mpg-
C3N4 was dispersed in 125 ml distilled water via ultrasonic treat-
ment for 15 min, followed by heating and stirring. When the
mpg-C3N4 suspension reached 60℃, (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2ꢀ6H2O and the
heated NH4Fe(SO4)2ꢀ12H2O solution were added to the mpg-C3N4
suspension. An alkaline solution comprising Na2CO3 and NaOH in
a molar ratio of 5:3 was slowly dropped into the mpg-C3N4
suspension until the pH was above 11.0 and stirring was continued
at 60 ℃ for 30 min, followed by aging at the same temperature for
30 min. Finally, the product was washed several times with dis-
tilled water to remove the bases, dried at 70 °C for 8 h, and then
ground and sieved to afford magnetic mpg-C3N4 powder, denoted
as MꢁmpgꢁC3N4.
2.4. Preparation of MꢁmpgꢁC3N4/BiOBr/PTh composite material
The MꢁmpgꢁC3N4, Bi(NO3)3ꢀ5H2O, and PTh dispersion was
weighed with a 1:5 mass ratio of MꢁmpgꢁC3N4 to theoretically
produced BiOBr, the PTh dispersion accounted for 0.25% of the total
weight of MꢁmpgꢁC3N4/BiOBr/PTh. The ratio of the MꢁmpgꢁC3-
N4, Bi(NO3)3ꢀ5H2O, and PTh was determinated by single factor
experiments and orthogonal experiment. The Bi(NO3)3ꢀ5H2O was
completely dissolved in 20 ml of ethylene glycol, followed by the
addition of the PTh dispersion and stirring for 15 min. MꢁmpgꢁC3-
N4 was then added, followed by stirring for 15 min and ultrasoni-
cation for another 15 min to obtain solution A. KBr was weighed
according to the stoichiometric relationship between Bi(NO3)3-
ꢀ5H2O and KBr in the reaction, dissolved in 20 ml of distilled water
and slowly dropped into solution A, which was subsequently stir-
red at 400 r/min for 30 min at room temperature, and then kept in
a reaction kettle at 140℃ for 18 h. Finally, the product was washed
successively with distilled water and ethanol, and dried at 70 °C
overnight to obtain the MꢁmpgꢁC3N4/BiOBr/PTh composite.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Materials
Urea (purity ꢂ 99%), tertiary butyl alcohol, and Na2-EDTA were
sourced from Tianjin Fuchen Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. SiO2 sol
(30% solid) was purchased from LUDOX, USA. NH4HF2 and 1, 4-
benzoquinone (purity ꢂ 97%) were provided by MACKLIN, Shang-
hai, China. Bi(NO3)3ꢀ5H2O was sourced from Tianjin Kemiou Chem-
ical Reagent Co., Ltd., KBr was purchased from Tianjin Baishi
Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Dimethyl phthalate (purity ꢂ 99.5%)
was sourced from the Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory.
Ethanol was obtained from Tianjin Fuyu Chemical Co., Ltd.
Polythiophene was purchased from Guangdong Wengjiang
Reagent Co., Ltd. (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2ꢀ6H2O was obtained from Tianjin
Yongda Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., and NH4Fe(SO4)2ꢀ12H2O from
Shanghai Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd. The reagents used in the study
were of analytical grade, except where mentioned above.
2.5. Characterization
Field emission scanning electron microscopy and transmission
electron microscopy (SEM/TEM) measurements were conducted
using an SU8220 field emission scanning electron microscope
(Hitachi, Japan) and a Talos F200S transmission electron micro-
scope (FEI, Czech Republic), respectively. Energy dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy (EDS) was detected using energy dispersive X-ray
spectrometry (Oxford X-Max50, UK). X-ray diffraction (XRD) spec-
troscopy was conducted using a D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer
(Bruker, Germany). X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were col-
lected using an Escalab 250Xi X-ray photoelectron spectrometer
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
2.2. mpg-C3N4 preparation
SiO2 sol was added to urea in a 1:3 mass ratio, followed by the
addition of distilled water until dissolution of urea to obtain a
mixed SiO2 and urea solution. The mixed solution was stirred at
90 °C to remove the water and obtain a white solid, which was sub-
sequently ground into powder, placed in a crucible, completely
wrapped and sealed with aluminum foil, and heated at 550 °C in
2