N. Zhang, et al.
InorganicaChimicaActa507(2020)119591
(bpy)2(H2O)]2·6H2O (bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine) through coordination in-
(NO3)3·6H2O). Elemental Analysis (%) Calcd for C15H34N6O23Sm2: C,
19.73; H, 2.96; N, 9.20. Found: C, 19.85; H, 2.85; N, 9.32. IR data (KBr,
cm−1): 3452, 2931, 2848, 1619, 1551, 1496, 1434, 1386.
teraction of Cu2+ and H6TTHA [42]. Our research group also reported
two
complexes
[Cd4(μ3-O)(TTHA)(H2O)2]·3H2O
and
[Zn5Na2(TTHA)2(H2O)10], and introduced their photoelectric proper-
ties and potential nitro derivatives sensing [43]. Based on the above
research background, a lot of follow-up research works were also car-
ried out by our research group, a sequence of isomorphic Ln-H6TTHA
MOFs ([Ln2(TTHA)(H2O)4]·7H2O (Ln = Sm(1), Eu(2), Gd(3), Tb(4) and
Dy(5))) were synthesized by the hydrothermal methods. Base on lumi-
nescence properties of Eu3+, Tb3+, complexes 2 and 4 were used firstly
as fluorescent probes for fluorescent sensing of NACs.
[Eu2(TTHA)(H2O)4]·7H2O (2) Yield: 86% (based on Eu
(NO3)3·6H2O). Elemental Analysis (%) Calcd for C15H34N6O23Eu2: C,
18.85; H, 3.50; N, 8.66. Found: C, 18.90; H, 3.59; N, 8.59. IR data (KBr,
cm−1): 3431, 2937, 2848, 1612, 1552, 1496, 1448, 1406.
[Gd2(TTHA)(H2O)4]·7H2O (3) Yield: 87% (based on Gd
(NO3)3·6H2O). Elemental Analysis (%) Calcd for C15H34N6O23Gd2: C,
18.85; H, 3.47; N, 8.56. Found: C, 18.50; H, 3.50; N, 8.65. IR data (KBr,
cm−1): 3431, 2931, 2841, 1606, 1558, 1496, 1441, 1393.
[Tb2(TTHA)(H2O)4]·7H2O (4) Yield: 87% (based on Tb
(NO3)3·6H2O). Elemental Analysis (%) Calcd for C15H34N6O23Tb2: C,
20.33; H, 2.60; N, 9.49. Found: C, 20.35; H, 2.75; N, 9.54. IR data
(KBr,cm−1): 3438, 2931, 2848, 1619, 1564, 1503, 1448, 1393.
[Dy2(TTHA)(H2O)4]·7H2O (5) Yield: 76% (based on Dy
(NO3)3·6H2O). Elemental Analysis (%) Calcd for C15H34N6O23Dy2: C,
18.15; H, 3.43; N, 8.47. Found: C, 18.16; H, 3.46; N, 8.42. IR data
(KBr,cm−1): 3433, 294, 2848, 1619, 1558, 1489, 1448, 1400.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Materials and methods
All the chemicals purchased were of reagent grade or better and
were used without further purification. Ligand H6TTHA was success-
fully synthesized by referencing to the methods described in the lit-
erature (see Supporting information). IR spectra were performed on a
Bruker AXS TENSOR-27 FT-IR spectrometer to compress KBr pellets in
the range of 400–4000 cm−1. The elemental analyses of C, H, and N
were analyzed by a Perkin-Elmer 240C automatic analyzer. Thermo-
gravimetric analyses (TG) were performed under the condition of N2
atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 ℃ min−1 using a Perkin Elmer
Diamond TG/DTA. The photoluminescent spectra of the complexes
were measured on a HORIBA Fluoromax-4-TCSPC spectrofluorometer
equipped with Spectra LED Pulsed with LED source at room tempera-
ture (200–1000 nm) with 3.2-in Integrating Sphere that can be installed
in seconds replacing standard cuvette holder. UV–vis spectra were re-
corded with JASCO V-570 spectrophotometer with Φ = 60 mm In-
tegrating Sphere that can be installed in standard cuvette holder
(200–2500 nm, in the form of solid sample) and Lambda 35 UV–vis
Spectrometer (200–800 nm). PXRD patterns were obtained with a
Bruker Advance-D8 equipped with Cu-Kα radiation, in the range of
5° < 2θ < 60°, with a step size of 0.02° (2θ) and a count time of 2 s
per step.
2.3. X-ray crystal structure determination
Complex 1 was selected for testing single crystals of suitable di-
mensions for complex 1 was mounted on glass fibers for the X-ray
structure determinations. Reflection data were collected at room tem-
perature on a Bruker AXS SMART APEX II CCD diffractometer with
graphite monochromatized Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). A
semiempirical absorption correction was applied by the program
SADABS [46]. The program suite SHELXTL-97 was used for space-group
determination (XPREP), direct method structure solution (XS), and
least-squares refinement (XL) [47,48]. All non-hydrogen atoms were
refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. The positions of the
hydrogen atoms around the carbon atoms were included using a riding
model. Hydrogen atoms of coordination water molecules and lattice
water molecules were found in the difference Fourier map. Crystal data
and structure refinement parameters are given in Table S1.
3. Results and discussion
2.2. Preparation
3.1. Synthesis
2.2.1. Preparation of the H6TTHA
Ligand H6TTHA was synthesized on the basis of the method in re-
lated literature [44,45], see the Supplementary materials for specific
synthesis methods. The synthetic route is as follows (Scheme 1):
Complexes 1–5 as crystal or precipitates were obtained at the hy-
drothermal condition by heating to 160 °C for 72 h, pH was adjusted to
4, and molar ratio of metal salt to ligand H6TTHA of 2:1. First, in the
synthesis process, the products of the complexes 1–5 were first obtained
at 100 ℃, but there were many impurities in the crystals, and it was
difficult to eliminated impurities by washing so that we cannot obtain
pure crystals for X-ray diffraction. Furthermore, through the constant
exploration and improvement of the experimental environment, it was
found finally that crystals were obtained at both 80 °C and 120 °C, but it
is worth noting that when the reaction temperature was 160 °C, the
crystal of complex 1 obtained were the most transparent, and the yield
was higher with almost no impurities. Second, when the initial pH of
the reaction system was alkaline, only precipitation can be obtained.
Under neutral conditions, the crystallites began to appear. When we
adjusted the reaction system to an excessively acidic state, only clear
solution can be obtained. After many adjustments, we finally found that
when the pH of the system was 4, the crystals of the complex obtained
were the most perfect. Last, for the mol ratio of H6TTHA and rare earth
metal nitrates, considering that the rare earth metals generally adopt a
high coordination mode, we first selected a high ratio of metal to ligand
for experiments. However, as a ligand with six carboxyl groups si-
multaneously, H6TTHA itself can also be coordinated with a plurality of
metals. After a number of experimental trials, we finally found optimal
molar amount of the metal and ligand is 2:1.
2.2.2. Preparation of the complexes
0.0432 g of Sm(NO3)3·6H2O (0.1 mmol) and 0.0237 g of H6TTHA
(0.05 mmol) were dissolved in 3 mL of deionized water respectively.
After stirring at room temperature for 5 min, the obtained clarified
solution was mixed and stirred again for 0.5 h to make the solution fully
mixing, the pH of the mixture was adjusted to 4. Then, the mixture
solution was put into Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated
at 160 °C for 3 days, then cooled to room temperature, transparent
block crystals were obtained. The synthesis method of complexes 2–5 is
similar to that of complex 1, except that the rare earth nitrates used are
different. Detailed elemental analysis and infrared data are as follows:
[Sm2(TTHA)(H2O)4]·7H2O (1) Yield: 90% (based on Sm
Scheme 1. The synthetic route of the ligand H6TTHA.
2