368
D. Menche et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 365–369
product, which was obtained in preparatively useful
yields. This demonstrates the general functional group
tolerance of our method, which together with the mild
conditions adds to the overall efficiency of our
procedure.
C. O. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 35, 1043; de Vries, J. G.
Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 1086; Newman, D. J.; Cragg, G.
M.; Snader, K. M. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1022.
. For reviews, see: (a) Martens, J. In Houben-Weyl, 4th ed.;
Thieme: Stuttgart, 1995; Vol. E21d, p 4199; (b) Baxter, E.
W.; Reitz, A. B. In Organic Reactions; Wiley: New York,
3
2
002; Vol. 59, p 1; (c) Gomez, S.; Peters, J. A.; Masch-
With this method in hand, we then proceeded to further
study and expand the applicability also for the synthesis
meyer, T. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 1037; (d) Tararov,
V. I.; Kadyrov, R.; Riermeier, T. H.; Fischer, C.; B o¨ rner,
A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 561; (e) Ohkuma, T.;
Noyori, R. In Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis; Jac-
obsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer:
New York, 2004.
0
00
of trisubstituted amines of the general type NRR R by
1
1
the reaction of a secondary amine (8) with an addi-
tional aldehyde component under similar reductive con-
ditions as developed above (Table 2). To obtain full
conversion on a reasonable time scale, using 1.2 equiv
of the aldehyde and 1.5 equiv of the reducing agent
proved beneficial. In all cases, the desired trisubstituted
amines (9) were obtained in good (entries 1–8) to useful
4
. For selected more recent examples, see: (a) Gross, T.;
Seayad, A. M.; Ahmad, M.; Beller, M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
2
055; (b) Miriyala, B.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Williamson, J. S.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 1463; (c) Itoh, T.; Nagata, K.;
Miyazaki, M.; Ishikawa, H.; Kurihara, A.; Ohsawa, A.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6649.
1
2
(
entry 9) yields. Both aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes
and amines are accepted as substrates (e.g., entries 1–3)
and variations in the electronic and steric properties are
tolerated (entries 4–8). The order of attaching the alde-
hyde component appears to have no influence on the
isolated yield (entries 7 and 8). Notably, also alpha-
branched amines such as 8g (entry 9), which may be
readily obtained by the reductive amination of the
5
. (a) Menche, D.; Arikan, F. Synlett 2006, 6, 841; (b)
Menche, D.; Hassfeld, J.; Li, J.; Menche, G.; Ritter, A.;
Rudolph, S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 741.
6. For recent work on the use of the Hantzsch ester for
reductive aminations in the presence of chiral phosphoric
acids, see: (a) Hoffmann, S.; Seayad, A.; List, B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7424; (b) Storer, R. I.; Carrera,
D. E.; Ni, Y.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
5
b
respective ketones as previously described,
are
2
006, 128, 84; (c) Hoffmann, S.; Nicoletti, M.; List, B. J.
alkylated under these conditions to give the desired
products (9h). This demonstrates the usefulness of our
method also to particularly sterically demanding tertiary
amines.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13368.
7
. General procedure: A solution of the amine (3a–b,
1
.00 mmol) and the carbonyl component (4a–d,
2.20 mmol) in toluene (5 mL) was treated with the
Hantzsch ester (3, 760 mg, 2.40 mmol), thiourea (4,
˚
In conclusion, we have developed an efficient procedure
for the synthesis of structurally diverse tertiary amines
7.6 mg, 0.100 mmol) and MS 5 A (1.0 g) and the mixture
was stirred under nitrogen at 60 °C until complete
conversion (24–72 h). After filtration over Celite, the
solvent is evaporated and the residue purified by flash
chromatography on silica gel using mixtures of petroleum
ether and ethyl acetate as eluants to give the product
amines (7a–f) in a pure form.
. The use of only 2 equiv of the carbonyl component leads
to a decrease in the isolated yields, in particular when
volatile aldehydes are used.
9. The second amination step is much slower due to steric
reasons, which allows a selective amination for the
synthesis of secondary amines, as previously reported:
see Ref. 5. For optimum conversion also in the second
amination step, thiourea is crucial.
0
0
00
of the general formulas NR(R ) and NRR R , includ-
2
ing aromatic and sterically demanding amines. The
operationally simple procedure uses the Hantzsch ester
for transfer hydrogenation and proceeds in the presence
of molecular sieves and thiourea. The mild conditions
and chemoselectivity of this protocol should enable
applications also to complex and/or acid-sensitive sub-
strates. It is expected, that this method opens the venue
for further exploring sterically hindered tertiary amines
as synthons for preparative and medicinal chemistry.
8
1
0. All new compounds had spectroscopic data in support of
Acknowledgments
1
the assigned structures. Examplary data: 7a: H NMR d
(
300 MHz, CDCl ): 7.28 (m, 10H), 6.76 (d, J = 9.2 Hz,
3
We thank the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (‘Liebig-
Stipendium’ to D.M.) and the Deutsche Forschungs-
gemeinschaft (Grant: ME 2765/2-1) for financial
support. Furthermore, this work was supported by the
HZI. We thank Antje Ritter and Tatjana Arnold for
technical support and Fatih Arikan for fruitful discus-
sion. Thanks is also due to C. Kakoschke and B. Jas-
chok-Kentner for recording NMR spectra.
2
H), 6.69 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 4.55 (s, 4H), 3.72 (s, 3H);
1
3
C NMR d (75 MHz, CDCl ): 151.9, 143.9, 139.1,
3
128.6, 127.0, 126.9, 114.8, 114.7, 55.8, 55.2; HRMS
(ESI): m/z: calcd for C21
3
7
J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 4,61 (s, 4H), 2.22 (s, 3H); C NMR
d (75 MHz, CDCl ): 147.2, 139.0, 129.8, 128.6, 126.8,
1
C H21N [M] : 287.1674. Found: 287.1674. Compound
9
1H), 6.82 (m, 2H), 6.75 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 6.54 (d,
J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 4.50 (s, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 3.71 (s, 3H),
3.15 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 2.10 (dt, J = 7.0, 8.0 Hz, 1H),
+
H
21NO [M] : 303.1623. Found:
1
03.1626. Compound 7c: H NMR d (300 MHz, CDCl
3
):
.26 (m, 10H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.66 (d,
13
3
26.1, 112.9, 54.5, 20.2; HRMS (ESI): m/z: calcd for
+
21
1
e: H NMR d (300 MHz, CDCl ): 7.16 (m, 1H), 7.0 (m,
3
References and notes
1
. (a) Hawkins, J. M.; Lewis, T. A. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
49; (b) Ooi, T.; Uematsu, Y.; Maruoka, K. J. Am Chem.
1
3
6
0.96 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H); C NMR d (75 MHz, CDCl ):
3
Soc. 2006, 128, 2548.
157.3, 150.9, 143.8, 127.6, 127.4, 126.7, 120.3, 114.8,
2
. (a) Wolfson, J. S.; Hooper, D. C. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
113.5, 109.9, 60.4, 55.8, 55.2, 50.9, 27.6, 20.6; HRMS
+
1989, 2, 378; For some further examples, see: (b) Kappe,
(ESI): m/z: calcd for C19
H25NO
2
[M+H] : 300.1964.