may be difficult to predict.7 In general, the bulkiest sub-
stituent on the alkyne tends to end up R to the carbonyl
group. Among sterically similar substituents on the alkyne,
the more strongly electron-withdrawing group tends to end
up at the ꢀ position6d (Scheme 1).
Scheme 2.
Preparation of the Fluorinated Alkynes 1-3a
Scheme 1.
Regioselectivity of the Pauson-Khand Reactiona
a Method A: NaH/R2NH2/THF/-50 °C/1-3 h. Method B: AlMe3/
R2NH2/CH2Cl2/0 °C/2-4 h (ref 11).
a EWG: electron-withdrawing group. EDG: electron-donating group.
able, was prepared from trifluoroacetic anhydride by the highly
convenient Hamper’s procedure.12
Stoichiometric PKRs of the terminal alkyne 1 and of the
internal alkynes 2 and 3 were first studied. The alkynes were
treated with dicobalt octacarbonyl in toluene at room temper-
ature to cleanly form the corresponding hexacarbonyl cobalt
complexes (monitored by TLC). Once the complexes had been
formed, norbornadiene (10 equiv) was added, and the solution
was heated at 70 °C until the starting cobalt complexes
disappeared by TLC. The adducts 7-9 (derived from 1-3,
respectively) were obtained in moderate yields with complete
regioselectivity (7 and 8, as racemates; and 9, as a 1:1 mixture
of diastereoisomers) (Table 1). Most surprisingly, in all cases,
the fluorinated moiety was located at the R-position of the
enone. Contrary to our expectations, the bulky phenyl group
was ꢀ to the carbonyl and the EWG R. The regiochemistry of
adducts 7-9 was unambiguously established by NMR on the
basis of the coupling between the carbon and fluorine atoms.
Furthermore, the calculated chemical shifts of the olefinic
carbons fit particularly well with the recorded values. Lastly,
these results were confirmed by X-ray crystallography of
compound 8 (Figure 2).
Fluorinated substrates are very rarely used in PKRs. Indeed,
only a few examples of intramolecular PKR of fluorinated
enynes have been described.8,9 Moreover, to the best of our
knowledge, there are no reports on intermolecular PKR of
fluorinated substrates. Considering the importance of fluori-
nated compounds,10 we sought to explore intermolecular
PKRs of fluorinated alkynes and investigate how these
strongly electron-withdrawing groups affect regioselectivity.
We chose several terminal or internal alkynes (1-4) contain-
ing fluorine atoms at the propargylic position (Figure 1).
The stoichiometric PKR of ethyl 4,4,4-trifluorobutynoate (4)12
under the standard conditions afforded the cyclopentenone 10
in excellent yield (Table 1). Purification of the intermediate
cobalt hexacarbonyl complex (11) did not improve the yield.
The structure of the major isomer was carefully analyzed by
NMR: again, the trifluoromethyl group was found to be at the
R position of the enone. For the sake of comparison, ethyl
Figure 1. Four R-fluorinated alkynes studied.
The amides 1-3 were easily prepared from the readily
available bromodifluoroacetylenes 5.11 The Grignard derivative
of the corresponding acetylenes were treated in Barbier-type
conditions with ethyl chloroformate to give the esters 6.
Amination using sodium hydride in THF or AlMe3 in CH2Cl2
provided amides 1-3 in good yields (69-85%) (Scheme 2).11
Ethyl 4,4,4-trifluorobutynoate (4), although commercially avail-
(7) De Bruin, T. J. M.; Michel, C.; Vekey, K.; Greene, A. E.; Gimbert,
Y.; Milet, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 691, 4281.
(8) (a) Arimitsu, S.; Bottom, R. L.; Hammond, G. B. J. Fluorine Chem.
2008, 129, 1047. (b) Ferry, A.; Billard, T.; Langlois, B. R. Synlett 2005,
1027. (c) Harthong, S.; Billard, T.; Langlois, B. R. Synthesis 2005, 2253.
(d) Ishizaki, M.; Suzuki, D.; Hoshino, O. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001, 111, 81.
(9) (a) Nadano, R.; Ichikawa, J. Chem. Lett. 2007, 36, 22. (b) Nadano,
R.; Fuchibe, K.; Ikeda, M.; Takahashi, H.; Ichikawa, J. Chem. Asian J.
2010, 5, 1875.
(5) (a) Vazquez-Romero, A.; Cardenas, L.; Blasi, E.; Verdaguer, X.;
Riera, A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3104. (b) Vazquez-Romero, A.; Rodriguez,
J.; Lledo, A.; Verdaguer, X.; Riera, A. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4509. (c) Iqbal,
M.; Duffy, P.; Evans, P.; Cloughley, G.; Allan, B.; Lledo, A.; Verdaguer,
X.; Riera, A. Org. Biomol. Chem 2008, 6, 4649. (d) Iqbal, M.; Evans, P.;
Lledo, A.; Verdaguer, X.; Pericas, M. A.; Riera, A.; Loeffler, C.; Sinha,
(10) Modern fluoroorganic chemistry: synthesis, reactiVity, applications;
Peer, K., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004.
(11) (a) Fustero, S.; Ferna´ndez, B.; Bello, P.; del Pozo, C.; Arimitsu,
S.; Hammond, G. B. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4251. and literature cited therein.
(b) Arimitsu, S.; Ferna´ndez, B.; del Pozo, C.; Fustero, S.; Hammond, G. B.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2656. See also: (c) Fustero, S.; Bello, P.; Ferna´ndez,
B.; del Pozo, C.; Hammond, G. B. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 7690.
(12) (a) Hamper, B. C. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5558. (b) Hamper, B. C.
Org. Synth. 1992, 70, 246.
A. K.; Mueller, M. J. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 276
.
(6) (a) Schore, N. E. Org. React. 1991, 40, 1. (b) Krafft, M. E.; Romero,
R. H.; Scott, I. L. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5277. (c) Arjona, O.; Csa´ky¨,
A. G.; Murcia, M. C.; Plumet, J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7338. (d) Robert,
F.; Millet, A.; Gimbert, Y.; Konya, D.; Greene, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 5396
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 24, 2010
5621