2H), 1.66 (quint, 2H) ppm. 1-Tosyl-4,8,11-trimethylcyclam (2.32 g, 6.00
mmol) and phenol (1.34 g, 14.2 mmol) were combined in 33% HBr/HOAc
(60 ml) and heated to 100 °C for 16 h. The mixture was filtered, the solid
washed with Me2CO and Et2O and then dissolved in aqueous KOH to
liberate the free macrocyclic base. The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2,
and the extracts dried and evaporated to provide 1,4,8-trimethylcyclam, 1,
as a colorless oil (1.10 g, 76%). 1H NMR d 2.66 (t, 2H), 2.61 (t, 2H), 2.44
(t, 2H), 2.39 (m, 6H), 2.35 (t, 2H), 2.14 (s, 3H), 2.12 (s, 3H), 2.11 (s, 3H),
1.68 (quint, 2H), 1.56 (quint, 2H) ppm.
‡ X-ray crystallographic data for 3: C15H33ClN4NiO4S, M = 459.67,
monoclinic, a = 8.3748(15), b = 14.505(3), c = 8.9820(16) Å, b =
113.659(3)°, V = 999.4(3) Å3, T = 173 K, space group P21, Z = 2, m(Mo
Ka) = 1.237 mm21, 11765 reflections collected, 4729 unique (Rint
=
0.0550) which were used in all calculations. The specimen was a non-
merohedral twin with the twin law (by rows) [20.03015, 0.00732, 0.91909/
0.04477, 20.99794, 0.03830/ 1.08327, 0.01048, 0.02948], which corre-
sponds to a 180 degree rotation about direct axis [1.00, 0.01, 0.95].14 The
reflections were integrated for both twin components with SAINT
V6.35A.15 Absorption correction was performed with TWINABS V1.05.16
Redundant reflections were removed with STRIP-REDUNDANT.17 248
reflections were common to both twin components. Least-squares refine-
ments were performed with SHELXL V6.10.18 The final residuals for all
data were R1 = 0.0433 and wR2 = 0.0728. CCDC 220192. See http://
other electronic format.
Fig. 1 Thermal ellipsoid representation (50% probability boundaries) of the
cationic portion of the X-ray crystal structure of 3 with hydrogen atoms
omitted for clarity. Significant interatomic distances (Å) and angles (°)
include: Ni–N1, 2.117(2); Ni–N2, 2.148(3); Ni–N3, 2.129(3); Ni–N4,
2.166(3); Ni–S1, 2.2785(9); N1–Ni–N3, 172.59(10); N1–Ni–N2, 93.46(9);
N3–Ni–N2, 84.91(9); N1–Ni–N4, 84.66(10); N3–Ni–N4, 92.76(9); N2–Ni–
N4, 146.94(10); N1–Ni–S1, 88.48(7); N3–Ni–S1, 98.91(7); N2–Ni–S1,
106.83(7); N4–Ni–S1, 106.11(7).
1 J. Reedijk, in Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry, Vol. 2. G.
Wilkinson, Ed.; Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987; L. F. Lindroy, in The
Chemistry of Macrocyclic Ligand Complexes; Cambridge University
Press: Cambridge, 1989.
2 R. B. Lauffer, Chem. Rev., 1987, 87, 901. For a recent reference, see: G.
J. Bridger, R. T. Skerlj, S. Padmanabhan, S. A. Martellucci, G. W.
Henson, S. Struyf, M. Witvrouw, D. Schols and E. De Clercq, J. Med.
Chem., 1999, 42, 3971.
3 F. Denat, S. Brandès and R. Guilard, Synlett, 2000, 561.
4 I. Meunier, A. K. Mishra, B. Hanquet, P. Cocolios and R. Guilard, Can.
J. Chem., 1995, 73, 685.
5 For three BOC or Ts protecting groups, see: D. D. Dischino, E. J.
Delaney, J. E. Emswiler, G. T. Gaughan, J. S. Prasad, S. K. Srivastava
and M. F. Tweedle, Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 1265; S. Brandès, C. Gros,
F. Denat, P. Pullumbi and R. Guilard, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1996, 133,
65.
6 R. Tripier, J.-M. Lagrange, E. Espinosa, F. Denat and R. Guilard, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 2728; G. Royal, V. Dahaoui-Gindrey, S. Dahaoui, A.
Tabard, R. Guilard, P. Pullumbi and C. Lecomte, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
1998, 1971; C. Bucher, G. Royal, J.-M. Barbe and R. Guilard,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 2315.
7 E. K. Barefield, K. A. Foster, G. M. Freeman and K. B. Hodges, Inorg.
Chem., 1986, 25, 4663.
8 J. S. Bradshaw, K. E. Krakowiak, R. M. Izatt and D. J. Zamecka-
Krakowiak, Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31, 1077.
[(Me4cyclam)Ni(SPh)]PF6 (4) in which a distorted square
pyramidal Ni(II) ion is bound by a tetramethylcyclam ligand and
an axial benzenethiolate donor.13 The Ni–S distance in 4 (2.347
Å) is longer than that found in 3, and the pentacoordinate Ni(II
)
ion in 4 exhibits a smaller trigonal distortion (t = 0.25).11 Both
of these geometric differences are ascribed to the thiolate donor
being covalently tethered to the macrocyclic ligand in 3, a
condition that is absent in 4.
Compounds 1 and 2 are two examples of selectively alkylated
cyclams that can be prepared using the general methodology
described herein. The structural differences between 3 and 4
suggest that pentadentate ligands derived from 1,4,8-trime-
thylcyclam may provide access to metal complex structures or
reactions that are inaccessible without covalent attachment of
the fifth donor to the macrocyclic ring.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
(Grant CHE-0243951), the Camille and Henry Dreyfus Founda-
tion (Henry Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award), the University of
Minnesota/NSF RSEC program (Grant CHE-0113894), and the
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.
9 W. Yang, C. M. Giandomenico, M. Sartori and D. A. Moore,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 2481.
Notes and references
† Synthesis of 1: 1,4,8-tris(trifluoroacetyl)cyclam (2.51 g, 5.23 mmol), p-
toluenesulfonyl chloride (1.25 g, 6.56 mmol) and Et3N (0.80 ml, 5.8 mmol)
were combined in CH2Cl2 (30 ml) and refluxed 18 h. The mixture was
evaporated, the residue partitioned between H2O and CH2Cl2, the organic
phase separated, dried and evaporated to provide 1-tosyl-4,8,11-tris(tri-
fluoroacetyl)-cyclam (3.34 g, 99%). This material and KOH (1.24 g, 22.1
mmol) were combined in CH3OH (30 ml) and refluxed for 1.5 h. The
mixture was evaporated, the residue partitioned between aq. NaOH and
CH2Cl2, the organic phase separated, dried and evaporated to provide
1-tosylcyclam (1.72 g, 96%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.60 (d, 2H),
7.24 (d, 2H), 3.16 (t, 2H) 3.11 (t, 2H), 2.78 (t, 2H), 2.69 (m, 10H), 2.36 (s,
3H), 1.72 (quint, 2H), 1.65 (quint, 2H) ppm. 1-Tosylcyclam (2.35 g, 6.82
mmol), HCO2H (90%, 10 ml) and HCHO (37%, 8 ml) were refluxed for 4
h. The solution was cooled and made basic by addition of KOH. The
mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2, the extracts dried and evaporated to
provide 1-tosyl-4,8,11-trimethylcyclam (2.32 g, 88%). 1H NMR d 7.65 (d,
2H), 7.27 (d, 2H), 3.20 (dt, 4H), 2.70 (m, 6H), 2.60 (t, 2H), 2.49 (t, 2H), 2.41
(m, 2H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 2.31 (s, 3H), 2.17 (s, 3H), 1.84 (quint,
10 D. Tschudin, A. Basak and T. A. Kaden, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1988, 71,
100.
11 A. W. Addison, T. N. Rao, J. Reedjik, J. van Rijn and G. C. Verschoor,
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1984, 1349.
12 C. L. Schmid, M. Neuburger, M. Zehnder, T. A. Kaden, K. Bujno and
R. Bilewicz, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1997, 80, 241.
13 M. S. Ram, C. G. Riordan, R. Ostrander and A. L. Rheingold, Inorg.
Chem., 1995, 34, 5884.
14 GEMINI, Bruker Analytical X-Ray Systems, Madison, WI, (2000).
15 SAINT V6.35A, Bruker Analytical X-Ray Systems, Madison, WI,
(2002).
16 TWINABS V1.05, (a) G. Sheldrick, 2003; (b) R. Blessing, Acta Cryst.,
1995, A51, 33.
17 W. W. Brennessel and V. G. Young, Jr., STRIP-REDUNDANT V1.2, A
program to remove duplicated reflections from HKLF 5 files, un-
published work (2002).
18 SHELXTL V6.10, Bruker Analytical X-Ray Systems, Madison, WI,
(2000).
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2894–2895
2895