even after prolonged reaction time (48 h). This may be due to
the fact that the alkali metals are much more electropositive than
other metals. Magnesium oxide on the surface of magnesium
metal may also obstruct the reaction.
Chlorobenzene and iodobenzene can also catalyse the
reductive coupling, but their efficiency is slightly worse than
that of bromobenzene. For example, for the coupling of
PhCOCH the yields associated with chlorobenzene, iodo-
3
benzene, and bromobenzene are 76%, 74%, and 87%, re-
spectively. Another catalyst we found for the reductive coupling
coupling products as discussed before.16 Bromobenzene makes
the reaction more efficient because the electron transfer rate is
higher between the alkali metal and bromobenzene than
between the alkali metal and carbonyl compound.
In summary, we found a novel bromobenzene-catalysed
reductive coupling reaction of carbonyl compounds. The
reaction can be conducted under very mild conditions. The
yields are usually good. The diastereoselectivity is mostly high.
A single electron transfer mechanism is proposed for the
coupling.
is naphthalene. However, for the coupling of PhCOCH
3
using
We thank NSFC for the financial support.
naphthalene as the catalyst can only give a yield of 24%.
Addition of p-dinitrobenzene completely inhibits the cou-
pling, as it can capture the electron and turn into a radical anion
as indicated by the electron paramagnetic resonance (ESR)
spectrum (Fig. 1).15 Interestingly, this ESR signal does not
appear if either bromobenzene or the metal is not added to the
reaction mixture. We could not observe the ESR spectrum of
bromobenzene radical anion in the reaction, possibly because
this radical anion is too reactive. However, as long as both metal
and bromobenzene are added, the ESR signal appears in the
absence of the carbonyl compound. All these observations
indicate that p-nitrobenzene inhibits the reaction because it
captures the electron carried by the bromobenzene radical
anion.16 (Scheme 2).
Notes and references
1
T. Wirth, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 61; A. Gansauer,
Chem. Commun., 1997, 5, 457.
2 J. E. McMurry, Chem. Rev., 1989, 89, 1513; B. E. Kahn and R. D. Rieke,
Chem. Rev., 1988, 88, 733; F. R. Askham and K. M. Carroll, J. Org.
Chem., 1993, 58, 7328; D. S. Hays and G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1
1
995, 117, 7283; M. C. Barden and J. Schwartz, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
996, 118, 5484; R. Nomura, T. Matsuno and T. Endo, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1996, 118, 11666; C. J. Li and W. C. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
998, 120, 9102; H. J. Lim, G. Keum, S. B. Kang, B. Y. Chung and Y.
1
Kim, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 4367; R. S. Miller, J. M. Sealy, M.
Shabangi, M. L. Kuhlman, J. R. Fuchs and R. A. Flower, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2000, 122, 7718; A. Gansauer and H. Bluhm, Chem. Rev., 2000,
1
00, 2771; S. Talukdar and J. M. Fang, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 330; X.-
S. Fan and Y.-M. Zhang, Chin. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 22, 1.
B. Kammermeier, G. Beck, D. Jacobi and H. Jendralla, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 685.
I. Shiina, T. Nishimura, N. Ohkawa, H. Sakoh, K. Nishimura, K. Saitoh
and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 1997, 419; K. C. Nicolaou, Z. Yang, J.
J. Liu, H. Ueno, P. G. Nantermet, R. K. Guy, C. F. Claiborne, J. Renaud,
E. A. Couladouros, K. Paulvannan and E. J. Sorensen, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1995, 117, 634.
3
4
5
6
R. Fittig, Liebigs Ann., 1859, 110, 23; S. K. Pradhan and K. R. Thakker,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 1813.
A. S. Raw and S. F. Pedersen, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 830; T. Y. Li,
Fig. 1 EPR spectrum of p-dinitrobenzene radical anion.
W. Cui, J. G. Liu, J. Z. Zhao and Z. M. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2000,
2
, 139; T. Mukaiyama, N. Yoshimura, K. Igarashi and A. Kagayama,
Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 2499.
7
T. H. Chan and E. Vinokur, Tetrahedron Lett., 1972, 1, 75; A. Furstner,
R. G. Dushin, C. Rohrer and H. Weidmann, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1
1
3
, 1988, 1729; W. C. Zhang and C. J. Li, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
, 1998, 19, 3131; W. C. Zhang and C. J. Li, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64,
230; M. Mecarova and S. Toma, Green Chem., 1999, 1, 257.
8
9
C. J. Li, Y. Meng, X. H. Yi, J. H. Ma and T. H. Chan, J. Org. Chem.,
1
998, 63, 7498; A. Bensari and J. L. Renaud, Org. Lett., 2001, 3,
Scheme 2
3
863.
A. Furstner and B. Bogdanovic, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35,
2442; Y. Yamamoto, R. Hattori and K. Itoh, Chem. Commun., 1999,
825.
On the basis of the above observations, we propose a
mechanism for the catalytic reductive coupling (Scheme 3).
According to this mechanism, bromobenzene obtains one
electron from the alkali metal and becomes a radical anion.
Then bromobenzene radical anion transfers an electron to the
carbonyl compound, which is consequently turned into the
10 J. M. Khurana and A. Sehgal, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994,
71; S. Bhar and C. Panja, Green Chem., 1999, 1, 253; L. H. Li and T.
5
H. Chan, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 1129; Bian, S. M. Liu, J. T. Li and T. S.
Li, Synth. Commun., 2002, 32, 1169.
1
1
1 U. Groth and M. Jeske, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 2000, 39, 574.
2 Y. Hashimoto, U. Mizuno, H. Matsuoka, T. Miyahara, M. Takakura, M.
Yoshimoto, K. Oshima, K. Utimoto and S. Matsubara, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2001, 123, 1503.
13 J. E. McMurry and J. G. Rico, Tetrahedron Lett., 1989, 30, 1169.
14 A. Clerici and O. Porta, J. Org. Chem., 1982, 47, 2852.
15 We observed a symmetric spin distribution for p-dinitrobenzene radical
anion possibly because of the fast counterion exchange between the two
p-nitro groups which averages completely the hyperfine splitting (hfs)
pattern. See: L. Grossi and S. Strazzari, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1
999, 2141.
1
6 F. M. Roberson, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed. B. M. Trost,
Scheme 3
Pergamon, New York 1991, vol., ch. 2.6.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 506–507
507