investigate the reactions of the intermediate products leading
to the final product of EB oxidation, that is, benzoic acid.
We also investigated the influence of the intermediates on
the ratio of catalyst species in different oxidation states. As
a result, we obtained the system of differential equations that
correctly describes the process.
The mean relative error of the analysis is (5%.
2. GLC Analysis. Analysis of the reaction mixture was
performed on the gas chromatograph “Tsvet” model 500 with
FID and glass 1 m × 3 mm i.d. column packed with
INERTON super AW-DMCS (d ) 0.16-0.2 mm) with 5%
FFAP. Injector temperature 220 °C, column temperature
100-160 °C (3 min isotherm at 100 °C, temperature
programming 10 °C/min up to 160 °C, 15 min isotherm at
160 °C).
The concentrations were determined with the help of the
internal standard (n-octanol for AP and MPC and p-
nitroacetophenone for BA and phenol). Triphenylphosphin
was added to all samples of reaction mixture. It selectively
converted HPEB to MPC, then internal standards were added.
The mean relative error of the analysis is (5%.
Experimental Section
Kinetic Procedure. All the runs were carried out under
intensive mixing at standard pressure and 120 °C. In the
preliminary experiments it was established that the initial
reaction rate became independent of the stirrer speed at 2000
rpm and of oxygen flow above 0.5 L/min. All the kinetic
experiments were run under these conditions, thus ensuring
the absence of mass-transfer effects. The solvent was
pure ethyl benzene or its mixture with chlorobenzene. To
remove all traces of EBHP, EB prior to the reaction
was passed through the column packed with alumina and
distilled. After the purification, no traces of EBHP were
found. The reactor was a glass cylinder vessel of 80-120
mL volume, equipped with turbine mixer, gas inlet pipe,
sampler, contact thermometer, and Dean-Stark head for the
isolation of water from the gaseous reaction products, which
were condensed in the reflux cooler. The reaction temperature
was kept constant within (0.5 °C due to the system control
thermometer-relay.
After assembling the setup the Dean-Stark head was
filled with ethyl benzene. The reactor was loaded with
reaction components. Then the mixer and heating were turned
on. After the reaction temperature was reached, oxidant gas
was fed into the reactor. This moment was assumed as the
beginning of the reaction. The gas flow was controlled with
the flow meter.
The reaction was monitored by taking samples of the
reaction mixture with time.
The setup for the EB oxidation under anaerobic conditions
was eventually the same as described above only it lacked
the Dean-Stark head. To maintain an inert atmosphere argon
or nitrogen were fed into reactor instead of air.
Analysis Procedure. The concentrations of MPC, AP,
BA, and phenol were determined by GLC. The EBHP
concentration was determined by iodometric titration, and
concentration of Mn(III) by UV-spectroscopy. The EB
concentration was determined as the difference between its
initial concentration and the sum of organic reaction product
concentrations.
1. Iodometric Titration. The 1-mL sample of the reaction
mixture was put into a stoppered flask. To the flask was
added 10 mL of AcOH and 5 mL of 10% KI solution. The
flask was kept in the dark for 25 min. The evolved I2 was
titrated with 0.05 N Na2S2O3 solution. The EBHP concentra-
tion was calculated according to the equation:
3. UV Spectroscopy. To 1 mL of the sample was added
3 mL of freshly distilled acetic acid. The optical density of
the obtained solution was measured on “Specord-M40” UV-
vis spectrophotometer at 460 nm. The concentration of Mn3+
was determined by the calibration curve linking [Mn3+] with
the solution optical density.
The mean relative error of the analysis is (5%.
Results and Discussion
The Effect of the Hydroperoxide Addition. In the
noncatalysed oxidation free radicals are produced by the
thermal destruction of hydroperoxides.2,3 This destruction
which can proceed both by radical and molecular pathways
is also catalysed by metal ions.4,5 If the molecular mechanism
is prevailing, then the hydrocarbon oxidation rate would not
be increased by the addition of hydroperoxide despite the
increase in its decomposition rate as compared with non-
catalysed process. Air oxidation of EB in the presence of
Mn(II) salts in the absence of organic additives at 140 °C
begins after fairly long induction time. During that time
reaction mixture is only slightly coloured, and no reaction
products are accumulated. The oxidation begins after rapid
and complete transfer Mn2+ f Mn3+. Oxidation proceeds
rapidly at first, later slows, and eventually stops. Transforma-
tion of EB to MPC and AP via EBHP starts after induction
time. In all possibilities, inhibition is the result of some kind
of catalyst deactivation. However, when the oxidation is
carried out in the absence of inhibiting products of EBHP
decomposition (i.e., phenol and MPC), the reaction gives
benzoic acid in nearly quantitative yield.
On addition of EBHP to the starting reaction mixture, all
manganese ions were immediately oxidised to Mn3+. The
consumption of EB occurred without an induction time. All
kinetic curves were congruent with those observed in the
runs without added EBHP after the induction time. The same
results were obtained with addition of cumene hydroperoxide
(2) Emanuel, N. M.; Denisov, E. T.; Maizus, Z. K. Tsepnye Reakcii Okisleniya
UgleVodorodoV V Zhidkoi Phaze [Liquid-Phase Chain Hydrocarbon Oxida-
tion]; Nauka: Moscow, 1965.
(3) Emanuel, N. M.; Gal, D. Okislenie Etilbenzola [Ethyl Benzene Oxidation];
Nauka: Moscow, 1984.
VNa S O - V0
2
2 3
c )
NNa S O
2 2 3
2V
where c is EBHP concentration,VNa S O is the volume of
2
2 3
(4) Bal’kov, B. G.; Skibida, I. P.; Maizus, Z. K. IzV. AN SSSR, Ser. Khim.
titrant used, mL, V0 is the volume of titrant is for the titration
of the “blank” sample, mL; V is the sample volume, mL;
NNa S O is the normality of the titrant in mol/L.
1970, 1780-1785.
(5) Skibida, I. P.; Brodskii, M. S.; Gervits, M. Ya.; Goldina. L. A.; Maizus, Z.
K. Kinet. Katal. 1973, 14, 885-890.
2
2 3
Vol. 7, No. 2, 2003 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
149